Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Safe and Effective Alternative in Nonathletic Patients.

Nigerian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-09 DOI:10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20
Sachin Joshi, Utsav C Shetty, M D Salim, Naveen Meena, R Shiva Kumar, Varush K V Rao
{"title":"Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Safe and Effective Alternative in Nonathletic Patients.","authors":"Sachin Joshi,&nbsp;Utsav C Shetty,&nbsp;M D Salim,&nbsp;Naveen Meena,&nbsp;R Shiva Kumar,&nbsp;Varush K V Rao","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury which has been conventionally managed by various graft reconstruction using bone patellar tendon bone, or quadruple hamstring autograft, to name a few. However, all these grafts are associated with many complications. Lately, peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft has shown promising results in this field, although there is still a dearth of data on its use. We, therefore, aimed at carrying out a study to evaluate the functional outcome and knee stability results of ACL reconstruction using PLT graft.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with a completely torn ACL were included in the study. The PLT was harvested, and graft length, thickness, and harvesting time were noted intraoperatively. Knee stability and functional scores were evaluated clinically and using Lachman test (primarily) and KT-2000 arthrometer and subjectively with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 6, 12, and 24 months (secondary outcome) postoperatively. Ankle scores were also recorded by making use of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)-Hindfoot Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The graft harvest time was 7.4 min (5-9 min). The mean thickness of the graft on doubling was 7.9 mm (7-9 mm). Ninety-six percent of the patients were satisfied with their results of the knee surgery, and 95% of the patients had no complaints of ankle joint. The mean IKDC score postoperatively was 78.16 ± 6.23, and the mean AOFAS score was 98.4 ± 4.1. None of the patients had any neurovascular deficit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACL reconstruction using PLT graft yields a good functional score (IKDC, KT-2000 arthrometer) even at 2-year follow-up. It is a safe and effective autograft option for ACL reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/f0/NJS-27-42.PMC8112358.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_22_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury which has been conventionally managed by various graft reconstruction using bone patellar tendon bone, or quadruple hamstring autograft, to name a few. However, all these grafts are associated with many complications. Lately, peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft has shown promising results in this field, although there is still a dearth of data on its use. We, therefore, aimed at carrying out a study to evaluate the functional outcome and knee stability results of ACL reconstruction using PLT graft.

Patients and methods: Patients with a completely torn ACL were included in the study. The PLT was harvested, and graft length, thickness, and harvesting time were noted intraoperatively. Knee stability and functional scores were evaluated clinically and using Lachman test (primarily) and KT-2000 arthrometer and subjectively with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 6, 12, and 24 months (secondary outcome) postoperatively. Ankle scores were also recorded by making use of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)-Hindfoot Scale.

Results: Forty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. The graft harvest time was 7.4 min (5-9 min). The mean thickness of the graft on doubling was 7.9 mm (7-9 mm). Ninety-six percent of the patients were satisfied with their results of the knee surgery, and 95% of the patients had no complaints of ankle joint. The mean IKDC score postoperatively was 78.16 ± 6.23, and the mean AOFAS score was 98.4 ± 4.1. None of the patients had any neurovascular deficit.

Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using PLT graft yields a good functional score (IKDC, KT-2000 arthrometer) even at 2-year follow-up. It is a safe and effective autograft option for ACL reconstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

腓长肌腱自体移植物用于前交叉韧带重建:一种安全有效的非运动患者替代方法。
前言:前交叉韧带(ACL)是一种常见的损伤,传统的治疗方法是各种骨移植重建,包括骨髌腱骨,或四股腘绳肌腱自体移植,仅举几例。然而,所有这些移植物都伴有许多并发症。近来,自体腓骨长肌腱(PLT)移植在这一领域显示出良好的效果,尽管关于其应用的数据仍然缺乏。因此,我们旨在开展一项研究来评估使用PLT移植重建前交叉韧带的功能结局和膝关节稳定性结果。患者和方法:研究纳入了ACL完全撕裂的患者。采集PLT,术中记录移植物的长度、厚度和采集时间。术后6个月、12个月和24个月(次要结局),采用Lachman试验(主要)和KT-2000关节计对膝关节稳定性和功能评分进行临床评估,主观上采用国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。采用美国骨科足踝评分(AOFAS)-后足量表记录踝关节评分。结果:48例患者符合纳入标准。嫁接收获时间为7.4 min (5-9 min)。翻倍时嫁接体平均厚度为7.9 mm (7 ~ 9 mm)。96%的患者对膝关节手术效果满意,95%的患者无踝关节不适。术后IKDC平均评分为78.16±6.23,AOFAS平均评分为98.4±4.1。所有患者均无神经血管缺损。结论:即使在2年的随访中,使用PLT移植重建ACL也能获得良好的功能评分(IKDC, KT-2000关节计)。它是一种安全有效的ACL重建自体移植物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信