The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Lichtenstein Repair of Primary Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Nigerian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-09 DOI:10.4103/njs.NJS_52_19
Sudhir Kumar Jain, Tariq Hameed, Dhruv Jain, Mohak Singh, Adiba Nizam
{"title":"The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Lichtenstein Repair of Primary Inguinal Hernia: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sudhir Kumar Jain,&nbsp;Tariq Hameed,&nbsp;Dhruv Jain,&nbsp;Mohak Singh,&nbsp;Adiba Nizam","doi":"10.4103/njs.NJS_52_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to study the role of antibiotic prophylaxis, if any, in the prevention of wound infection after open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernias.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients coming to outpatient department for open mesh repair of inguinal hernia were randomized into the placebo group and antibiotic group, a total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study. Follow-up was done up to 1 month to look for any evidence of surgical site infection using the criteria of Centers for Disease Control on wound infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients in the antibiotic group and nine patients in the placebo group were found to have evidence of surgical site infection. This difference was found to be insignificant with <i>P</i> = 0.14. Three patients in the placebo group developed deep surgical site infection but on analysis, this difference was also found to be insignificant with <i>P</i> = 0.122.None of these patients required mesh removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The result of the present study suggests that the use of prophylactic antibiotics during mesh repair of primary inguinal hernias does not give any extra protection from infections. Multicenter meta-analysis is required to give definite guidelines regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":30399,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":"5-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/5b/NJS-27-5.PMC8112363.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.NJS_52_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to study the role of antibiotic prophylaxis, if any, in the prevention of wound infection after open mesh repair of primary inguinal hernias.

Materials and methods: Patients coming to outpatient department for open mesh repair of inguinal hernia were randomized into the placebo group and antibiotic group, a total of 150 patients were enrolled in the study. Follow-up was done up to 1 month to look for any evidence of surgical site infection using the criteria of Centers for Disease Control on wound infection.

Results: Twelve patients in the antibiotic group and nine patients in the placebo group were found to have evidence of surgical site infection. This difference was found to be insignificant with P = 0.14. Three patients in the placebo group developed deep surgical site infection but on analysis, this difference was also found to be insignificant with P = 0.122.None of these patients required mesh removal.

Conclusion: The result of the present study suggests that the use of prophylactic antibiotics during mesh repair of primary inguinal hernias does not give any extra protection from infections. Multicenter meta-analysis is required to give definite guidelines regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics.

预防抗生素在原发性腹股沟疝列支敦士登修复中的作用:一项前瞻性双盲随机安慰剂对照试验。
目的:目的是研究抗生素预防在预防腹股沟疝开放性修补术后伤口感染中的作用。材料与方法:将前来门诊接受开放式补片修补腹股沟疝的患者随机分为安慰剂组和抗生素组,共150例患者纳入研究。随访长达1个月,根据疾病控制中心伤口感染标准寻找手术部位感染的证据。结果:抗生素组12例患者和安慰剂组9例患者有手术部位感染的证据。差异不显著,P = 0.14。安慰剂组有3例患者发生深部手术部位感染,但经分析,这种差异也不显著,P = 0.122。这些患者都不需要移除补片。结论:本研究结果表明,在原发性腹股沟疝补片修补术中使用预防性抗生素并不能提供任何额外的感染保护。需要多中心荟萃分析来给出关于预防性抗生素使用的明确指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信