The interrater and intrarater reliability of the flexibility and strength tests included in the Sport Science Lab® screening protocol amongst professional rugby players.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-04-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1504
Candice MacMillan, Benita Olivier, Natalie Benjamin-Damons
{"title":"The interrater and intrarater reliability of the flexibility and strength tests included in the Sport Science Lab<sup>®</sup> screening protocol amongst professional rugby players.","authors":"Candice MacMillan,&nbsp;Benita Olivier,&nbsp;Natalie Benjamin-Damons","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Considering the injury incidence rate (IR) associated with elite-level rugby, measures to reduce players' injury risk are important. Establishing scientifically sound, pre-season musculoskeletal screening protocols forms part of injury prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the flexibility and strength tests included in the Sport Science Lab<sup>®</sup> (SSL) screening protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of 11 flexibility and nine strength tests. Twenty-four injury-free, elite, adult (> 18 years), male rugby players were screened by two raters on two occasions. To establish intrarater and interrater reliability, Gwet's AC<sub>1</sub>, AC<sub>2</sub> and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for the analysis of binary, ordinal and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was set at 95%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Flexibility tests which require lineal measurement had at least substantial interrater (ICC = 0.70-0.96) and intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.89-0.97). Most of the flexibility tests with binary outcomes attained almost perfect interrater and intrarater reliability (Gwet's AC<sub>1</sub> = 0.8-0.97). All strength tests attained at least substantial interrater (Gwet's AC<sub>2</sub> = 0.73-0.96) and intrarater (Gwet's AC<sub>2</sub> = 0.67-0.97) reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The level of interrater and intrarater reliability of most of the flexibility and strength tests investigated supports their use to quantify various aspects of neuromusculoskeletal qualities and possible intrinsic risk factors amongst elite rugby players.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Establishing the reliability of tests, is one step to support the inclusion thereof in official screening protocols. Results of our study, verify the reliability of the simple, clinically friendly strength and flexibility tests included and therefore support their use as preparticipation screening tools for rugby players. Further investigation as to the association thereof to athletes' injury risk and performance is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"77 1","pages":"1504"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8111643/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i1.1504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Considering the injury incidence rate (IR) associated with elite-level rugby, measures to reduce players' injury risk are important. Establishing scientifically sound, pre-season musculoskeletal screening protocols forms part of injury prevention strategies.

Objective: To determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of the flexibility and strength tests included in the Sport Science Lab® (SSL) screening protocol.

Methods: We determine the interrater and intrarater reliability of 11 flexibility and nine strength tests. Twenty-four injury-free, elite, adult (> 18 years), male rugby players were screened by two raters on two occasions. To establish intrarater and interrater reliability, Gwet's AC1, AC2 and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used for the analysis of binary, ordinal and continuous variables, respectively. Statistical significance was set at 95%.

Results: Flexibility tests which require lineal measurement had at least substantial interrater (ICC = 0.70-0.96) and intrarater reliability (ICC = 0.89-0.97). Most of the flexibility tests with binary outcomes attained almost perfect interrater and intrarater reliability (Gwet's AC1 = 0.8-0.97). All strength tests attained at least substantial interrater (Gwet's AC2 = 0.73-0.96) and intrarater (Gwet's AC2 = 0.67-0.97) reliability.

Conclusion: The level of interrater and intrarater reliability of most of the flexibility and strength tests investigated supports their use to quantify various aspects of neuromusculoskeletal qualities and possible intrinsic risk factors amongst elite rugby players.

Clinical implications: Establishing the reliability of tests, is one step to support the inclusion thereof in official screening protocols. Results of our study, verify the reliability of the simple, clinically friendly strength and flexibility tests included and therefore support their use as preparticipation screening tools for rugby players. Further investigation as to the association thereof to athletes' injury risk and performance is warranted.

在职业橄榄球运动员中,体育科学实验室®筛选协议中包括的柔韧性和力量测试的判读者和判读者内部可靠性。
背景:考虑到精英水平橄榄球运动的损伤发生率(IR),降低运动员受伤风险的措施是重要的。建立科学合理的,季前肌肉骨骼筛选协议是伤害预防策略的一部分。目的:确定运动科学实验室(Sport Science Lab®,SSL)筛选方案中柔韧性和力量测试的解释和解释信度。方法:测定11项柔韧性试验和9项强度试验的内部信度和内部信度。24名无损伤的成年精英橄榄球运动员(> 18岁)由两名评分员分两次进行筛选。为了建立组内信度和组间信度,分别采用Gwet的AC1、AC2和组内相关系数(ICC)对二元、有序和连续变量进行分析。统计学显著性为95%。结果:要求线性测量的柔韧性测试至少具有显著的间效度(ICC = 0.70-0.96)和内效度(ICC = 0.89-0.97)。大多数具有二元结果的灵活性测试获得了几乎完美的解释间和解释内信度(Gwet的AC1 = 0.8-0.97)。所有强度试验均达到了至少相当大的层间信度(Gwet的AC2 = 0.73-0.96)和层内信度(Gwet的AC2 = 0.67-0.97)。结论:所调查的大多数柔韧性和力量测试的内部和内部可靠性水平支持它们用于量化精英橄榄球运动员神经肌肉骨骼质量的各个方面和可能的内在风险因素。临床意义:建立检测的可靠性是支持将其纳入官方筛查方案的一步。我们的研究结果验证了简单的、临床友好的力量和柔韧性测试的可靠性,因此支持它们作为橄榄球运动员参与前筛查工具的使用。进一步调查其与运动员受伤风险和表现的关系是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信