Le savoir expérientiel : exploration épistémologique d’une expression répandue dans le domaine de la santé.

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Emmanuelle Cartron, Sandrine Lefebvre, Ljiljana Jovic
{"title":"Le savoir expérientiel : exploration épistémologique d’une expression répandue dans le domaine de la santé.","authors":"Emmanuelle Cartron,&nbsp;Sandrine Lefebvre,&nbsp;Ljiljana Jovic","doi":"10.3917/rsi.144.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the different forms of knowledge, experiential knowledge is widely used in certain activities in the field of health. Most often connected to patients, it is also discussed in relation to health professionals, but less frequently. This article offers some points of reference and clarifies what underlies experiential knowledge. These points of reference are based on definitions of experience and knowledge, as well as work on the type of knowledge created by experience. An exploration of the contexts in which &#8220;experiential knowledge&#8221; has emerged and the focus of the disciplines that discuss it finds few epistemological connections between knowledge and experience. In the humanities and social sciences, experiential knowledge is most often connected to patients or adults in educational situations. With regard to nursing knowledge, the analysis of Carper and Lechasseur&#8217;s work on the nature of nursing knowledge reveals how the characteristics of experience are integrated into their typologies, particularly when it comes to artistic and personal knowledge. The explicit absence of experience in these typologies is then questioned with regard to the scientific imperatives that nursing science, at this particular period in its construction, is determined to promote.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":"144 1","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.144.0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Among the different forms of knowledge, experiential knowledge is widely used in certain activities in the field of health. Most often connected to patients, it is also discussed in relation to health professionals, but less frequently. This article offers some points of reference and clarifies what underlies experiential knowledge. These points of reference are based on definitions of experience and knowledge, as well as work on the type of knowledge created by experience. An exploration of the contexts in which “experiential knowledge” has emerged and the focus of the disciplines that discuss it finds few epistemological connections between knowledge and experience. In the humanities and social sciences, experiential knowledge is most often connected to patients or adults in educational situations. With regard to nursing knowledge, the analysis of Carper and Lechasseur’s work on the nature of nursing knowledge reveals how the characteristics of experience are integrated into their typologies, particularly when it comes to artistic and personal knowledge. The explicit absence of experience in these typologies is then questioned with regard to the scientific imperatives that nursing science, at this particular period in its construction, is determined to promote.

经验知识:对健康领域广泛表达的认识论探索。
在不同形式的知识中,经验性知识广泛应用于卫生领域的某些活动。它通常与患者有关,也与卫生专业人员有关,但较少讨论。本文提供了一些参考点,并澄清了经验知识的基础。这些参考点是基于经验和知识的定义,以及对经验所创造的知识类型的研究。探索经验知识”已经出现,讨论它的学科的焦点发现知识和经验之间很少有认识论上的联系。在人文和社会科学中,经验知识通常与患者或教育情境中的成年人联系在一起。关于护理知识,对Carper和lechasseur关于护理知识性质的工作的分析揭示了经验的特征是如何融入他们的类型学的,特别是当涉及到艺术和个人知识时。在这些类型学中明确缺乏经验,然后就护理科学的科学要求提出质疑,在其建设的这个特定时期,决心促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信