{"title":"Use of gestation adjusted projection method for predicting fetal head circumference.","authors":"Michelle N Lende, Ariana G Munger, Craig M Zelig","doi":"10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32-36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HC<sub>BIRTH</sub>) by measures of error and with paired <i>t</i>-tests. McNemar's test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP's performance remained good.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HC<sub>BIRTH</sub> could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520807,"journal":{"name":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","volume":" ","pages":"6836-6840"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1926450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine if the gestation adjusted projection (GAP) method applied to a fetal head circumference (FHC) measured on ultrasound between 32 and 36 weeks and 6 days gestation can predict birth head circumference, specifically ≥ 35 cm, which is a known risk factor for Cesarean.
Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 60 pregnancies from January to December 2019. Eligible patients delivered a singleton term neonate and received two ultrasounds, one at 32-36 weeks and 6 days gestation (period 1) and a second within 7 days of a term birth (period 2). Fetal head circumference was predicted two ways, by applying (1) the GAP method to the period 1 ultrasound and (2) by direct measurement with a period 2 ultrasound. These estimates were compared to the birth head circumference (HCBIRTH) by measures of error and with paired t-tests. McNemar's test compared the ability to predict head circumference (HC) ≥ 35 cm.
Results: None of the measures of error were significantly different between the GAP and the period 2 ultrasound, including the ability to predict HC ≥ 35 cm. In patients who delivered at ≥ 39 weeks, the period 2 ultrasound performed poorly while the GAP's performance remained good.
Conclusion: The GAP method applied to an early third trimester ultrasound predicts HCBIRTH with accuracy similar to an ultrasound performed seven days from delivery and may be superior for deliveries ≥ 39 weeks. The ability to predict HCBIRTH could improve clinical management of affected pregnancies.