Perceptions and Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Among Floridian Middle and High School Students: Secondary Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Results.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2020-09-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X20953402
Anastasiya Ferrell, Linda Hadddad, Jennifer Harrison Elder, Cyndi Garvan, Christa L Cook, Ramzi Salloum
{"title":"Perceptions and Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Among Floridian Middle and High School Students: Secondary Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Results.","authors":"Anastasiya Ferrell,&nbsp;Linda Hadddad,&nbsp;Jennifer Harrison Elder,&nbsp;Cyndi Garvan,&nbsp;Christa L Cook,&nbsp;Ramzi Salloum","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20953402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid increase in youth use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) led the state and the federal governments to implement minimum-age policies to restrict minors' access to vaping products. Limited success of the age restrictions fueled efforts to increase the distribution age of all tobacco products to 21 (ie, Tobacco 21 or T21 policies). With limited data on the T21 policies, the current study examines the prevalence of ENDS use and the perceptions about ENDS among youth in the pre- and post-policy-implementation periods for one of these bans in the state of Florida.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted secondary analysis on the responses from the 2014 and 2015 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, which collected cross-sectional data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the data from spring of 2014, the minimum-age policy enacted on July 1, 2014 did not lead to a significant decrease in Florida's high school and middle school students' <i>ever</i> ENDS use (14.9% in 2014 vs 25.8% in 2015) and <i>current</i> ENDS use (7.5% in 2014 vs 12.4% in 2015). There was some ambiguity among students regarding the ENDS harm-more students in 2015 thought of ENDS as both equally (11.0% vs 7.7%) and less (32.4% vs 28%) harmful than cigarettes. There was a decrease in the proportion of students who were unsure about their answer to this question (51.5% vs 59.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Policy change alone may not be effective in shifting the trend of ENDS use among middle and high school students. Although students may know about some of the ENDS effects, many of them are still not aware about the harms. Interventions in school and in the community should be aiming to raise this awareness.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20953402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179173X20953402","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20953402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid increase in youth use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) led the state and the federal governments to implement minimum-age policies to restrict minors' access to vaping products. Limited success of the age restrictions fueled efforts to increase the distribution age of all tobacco products to 21 (ie, Tobacco 21 or T21 policies). With limited data on the T21 policies, the current study examines the prevalence of ENDS use and the perceptions about ENDS among youth in the pre- and post-policy-implementation periods for one of these bans in the state of Florida.

Methods: This study conducted secondary analysis on the responses from the 2014 and 2015 Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, which collected cross-sectional data.

Results: Compared to the data from spring of 2014, the minimum-age policy enacted on July 1, 2014 did not lead to a significant decrease in Florida's high school and middle school students' ever ENDS use (14.9% in 2014 vs 25.8% in 2015) and current ENDS use (7.5% in 2014 vs 12.4% in 2015). There was some ambiguity among students regarding the ENDS harm-more students in 2015 thought of ENDS as both equally (11.0% vs 7.7%) and less (32.4% vs 28%) harmful than cigarettes. There was a decrease in the proportion of students who were unsure about their answer to this question (51.5% vs 59.2%).

Conclusions: Policy change alone may not be effective in shifting the trend of ENDS use among middle and high school students. Although students may know about some of the ENDS effects, many of them are still not aware about the harms. Interventions in school and in the community should be aiming to raise this awareness.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

佛罗里达州初高中学生对电子尼古丁传递系统的认知和使用:对横断面调查结果的二次分析。
导读:青少年使用电子尼古丁传输系统(ENDS)的人数迅速增加,导致州和联邦政府实施了限制未成年人接触电子烟产品的最低年龄政策。年龄限制取得的有限成功推动了将所有烟草制品的销售年龄提高到21岁的努力(即21岁烟草政策或T21政策)。在T21政策数据有限的情况下,本研究调查了佛罗里达州一项禁令在政策实施前后青少年中终端使用的流行程度和对终端的看法。方法:本研究对2014年和2015年佛罗里达州青少年烟草调查的反馈进行二次分析,收集横截面数据。结果:与2014年春季的数据相比,2014年7月1日颁布的最低年龄政策并没有导致佛罗里达州高中和中学生的ENDS使用量(2014年为14.9%,2015年为25.8%)和当前的ENDS使用量(2014年为7.5%,2015年为12.4%)显著下降。学生对电子烟危害的看法有些模棱两可——2015年,更多的学生认为电子烟的危害与香烟相当(11.0%对7.7%),但比香烟的危害更小(32.4%对28%)。不确定答案的学生比例有所下降(51.5%对59.2%)。结论:仅靠政策改变可能无法有效改变初高中学生终端使用的趋势。虽然学生们可能知道一些ENDS的影响,但他们中的许多人仍然没有意识到它的危害。学校和社区的干预措施应旨在提高这一认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信