{"title":"Molecular allergy diagnosis using pollen marker allergens and pollen panallergens: Five patterns seen in multiple test reactions to pollen extracts.","authors":"Jörg Kleine-Tebbe, Juliane Ackermann-Simon, Gerald Hanf","doi":"10.5414/ALX02238E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polysensitizations to tree, grass, and weed pollen are found in ~ 20% of pollen-allergic individuals. They are often based on broad IgE cross-reactivities to pollen panallergens belonging to highly conserved protein families: 1. profilins, 2. polcalcins (calcium-binding proteins in pollen), 3. cyclophilins. They represent highly conserved cross-reactive minor allergens present in all pollen species, but also in plant foods and other organisms. Despite being rarely clinically relevant they can hamper allergy diagnostic tests with extracts. In this situation, molecular allergy diagnosis is able to distinguish broad cross-reactivity due to allergen-specific IgE to pollen panallergens (i.e. profilins Bet v 2 or Phl p 12; polcalcins Bet v 4 or Phl p 7; and, in the future, cyclophilins Bet v 7 or Ole e 15) from primary IgE sensitizations to so-called marker allergens represented by important pollen major allergens: Bet v 1 for the birch and beech family (<i>Fagales</i>), Ole e 1 for olive and ash (<i>Oleaceae</i>), Phl p 1 for temperate climate grasses (<i>Poaceae</i>), Art v 1 for mugwort (<i>Artemisia</i>), Amb a 1 for Ambrosia species (<i>Ambrosia</i>). Five typical cases (A - E) with positive skin prick test results to tree, grass, and weed pollen extracts demonstrate typical patterns of IgE sensitization with a variable impact of pollen panallergens: A - profilins, B - polcalcins, C - profilins and polcalcins, D - presumably cyclophilins, E - primary polysensitization to tree, grass, and weed pollen without interference from profilins or polcalcins. Differences between pollen extract-based skin prick test diagnosis and molecular allergen-specific IgE testing are explained using the presented concept. This approach allows to reduce the number of allergen extracts - presuming they are also clinically relevant - for allergen immunotherapy (i.e., only tree and/or grass pollen extracts), particularly in pollen-polysensitized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7485,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie Select","volume":"5 ","pages":"180-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8167734/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie Select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02238E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Polysensitizations to tree, grass, and weed pollen are found in ~ 20% of pollen-allergic individuals. They are often based on broad IgE cross-reactivities to pollen panallergens belonging to highly conserved protein families: 1. profilins, 2. polcalcins (calcium-binding proteins in pollen), 3. cyclophilins. They represent highly conserved cross-reactive minor allergens present in all pollen species, but also in plant foods and other organisms. Despite being rarely clinically relevant they can hamper allergy diagnostic tests with extracts. In this situation, molecular allergy diagnosis is able to distinguish broad cross-reactivity due to allergen-specific IgE to pollen panallergens (i.e. profilins Bet v 2 or Phl p 12; polcalcins Bet v 4 or Phl p 7; and, in the future, cyclophilins Bet v 7 or Ole e 15) from primary IgE sensitizations to so-called marker allergens represented by important pollen major allergens: Bet v 1 for the birch and beech family (Fagales), Ole e 1 for olive and ash (Oleaceae), Phl p 1 for temperate climate grasses (Poaceae), Art v 1 for mugwort (Artemisia), Amb a 1 for Ambrosia species (Ambrosia). Five typical cases (A - E) with positive skin prick test results to tree, grass, and weed pollen extracts demonstrate typical patterns of IgE sensitization with a variable impact of pollen panallergens: A - profilins, B - polcalcins, C - profilins and polcalcins, D - presumably cyclophilins, E - primary polysensitization to tree, grass, and weed pollen without interference from profilins or polcalcins. Differences between pollen extract-based skin prick test diagnosis and molecular allergen-specific IgE testing are explained using the presented concept. This approach allows to reduce the number of allergen extracts - presuming they are also clinically relevant - for allergen immunotherapy (i.e., only tree and/or grass pollen extracts), particularly in pollen-polysensitized patients.
大约20%的花粉过敏个体对树、草和杂草花粉多致敏。它们通常基于对花粉泛过敏原的广泛IgE交叉反应,属于高度保守的蛋白质家族。profilins 2。花粉钙结合蛋白(花粉中的钙结合蛋白);还有。它们代表了高度保守的交叉反应性次要过敏原,存在于所有花粉物种中,但也存在于植物性食物和其他生物中。尽管很少与临床相关,但它们会阻碍提取物的过敏诊断测试。在这种情况下,分子过敏诊断能够区分由于过敏原特异性IgE对花粉泛过敏原的广泛交叉反应性(即谱蛋白Bet v2或Phl p12;polcalcins bet4或php7;并且,在未来,亲环蛋白Bet v 7或Ole e 15)从初级IgE致敏到所谓的标记过敏原,这些过敏原由重要的花粉主要过敏原代表:桦树和山毛榉家族(Fagales)的Bet v 1,橄榄和灰(油橄榄科)的Ole e 1,温带气候草(Poaceae)的Phl p 1,艾草(Artemisia)的Art v 1, Amb a 1的Ambrosia物种(Ambrosia)。5例典型病例(A - E)对树、草和杂草花粉提取物的皮肤点刺试验结果呈阳性,表现出典型的IgE致敏模式,受花粉泛过敏原的不同影响:A - profilins、B - polcalcins、C - profilins和polcalcins, D -可能是亲环蛋白,E -对树、草和杂草花粉的初级多致敏,不受profilins或polcalcins的干扰。基于花粉提取物的皮肤点刺试验诊断和分子过敏原特异性IgE检测之间的差异解释使用提出的概念。这种方法可以减少过敏原提取物的数量-假设它们也与临床相关-用于过敏原免疫治疗(即,仅树和/或草花粉提取物),特别是在花粉多致敏的患者中。