Statin but not aspirin treatment is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes without obstructive coronary artery disease: a cohort study from the Western Denmark Heart Registry.
Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Troels Thim, Reimar W Thomsen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Henrik T Sørensen, Michael Maeng
{"title":"Statin but not aspirin treatment is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk in patients with diabetes without obstructive coronary artery disease: a cohort study from the Western Denmark Heart Registry.","authors":"Kevin Kris Warnakula Olesen, Uffe Heide-Jørgensen, Troels Thim, Reimar W Thomsen, Hans Erik Bøtker, Henrik T Sørensen, Michael Maeng","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Patients with diabetes and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as assessed by coronary angiography (CAG) are frequently treated with aspirin and statins. We examined the effectiveness of aspirin and statin treatment on cardiovascular and bleeding incidence in patients with diabetes and absent obstructive CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study included patients with diabetes and absent obstructive CAD as assessed by CAG from 2003 to 2016 in Western Denmark. We stratified patients by aspirin and statin treatment within 6 months after CAG in two separate analyses. Outcomes were MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and death) and bleeding (aspirin only). To account for confounding, we used propensity score-based weights to estimate the inverse probability of treatment-weighted hazard ratios (HRIPTW). We included 4124 patients with diabetes but without CAD as assessed by CAG, among whom 2474 (60%) received aspirin and 2916 (71%) received statin treatment within 6 months following CAG. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Aspirin did not reduce 10-year MACE [21.3% vs. 21.8%, HRIPTW 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.25], all-cause death (HRIPTW 0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.23), or bleeding (HRIPTW 0.95, 95% CI 0.73-1.23), compared to those not receiving aspirin treatment. Statin treatment reduced MACE (25% vs. 37%, HRIPTW 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70) compared to those not receiving statin treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with diabetes and no obstructive CAD, aspirin neither reduced MACE nor increased bleeding. In contrast, statin treatment was associated with a major reduction in risk of MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11995,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"434-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal — Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Patients with diabetes and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) as assessed by coronary angiography (CAG) are frequently treated with aspirin and statins. We examined the effectiveness of aspirin and statin treatment on cardiovascular and bleeding incidence in patients with diabetes and absent obstructive CAD.
Methods and results: The study included patients with diabetes and absent obstructive CAD as assessed by CAG from 2003 to 2016 in Western Denmark. We stratified patients by aspirin and statin treatment within 6 months after CAG in two separate analyses. Outcomes were MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and death) and bleeding (aspirin only). To account for confounding, we used propensity score-based weights to estimate the inverse probability of treatment-weighted hazard ratios (HRIPTW). We included 4124 patients with diabetes but without CAD as assessed by CAG, among whom 2474 (60%) received aspirin and 2916 (71%) received statin treatment within 6 months following CAG. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Aspirin did not reduce 10-year MACE [21.3% vs. 21.8%, HRIPTW 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.25], all-cause death (HRIPTW 0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.23), or bleeding (HRIPTW 0.95, 95% CI 0.73-1.23), compared to those not receiving aspirin treatment. Statin treatment reduced MACE (25% vs. 37%, HRIPTW 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70) compared to those not receiving statin treatment.
Conclusion: Among patients with diabetes and no obstructive CAD, aspirin neither reduced MACE nor increased bleeding. In contrast, statin treatment was associated with a major reduction in risk of MACE.
目的:经冠状动脉造影(CAG)评估无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的糖尿病患者经常使用阿司匹林和他汀类药物治疗。我们检查了阿司匹林和他汀类药物治疗对糖尿病和无阻塞性CAD患者心血管和出血发生率的有效性。方法和结果:本研究纳入2003年至2016年丹麦西部地区CAG评估的糖尿病和无阻塞性CAD患者。在两个单独的分析中,我们对CAG后6个月内的患者进行阿司匹林和他汀类药物治疗的分层。结果是MACE(主要不良心血管事件,心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和死亡的复合)和出血(仅使用阿司匹林)。为了考虑混杂因素,我们使用基于倾向得分的权重来估计治疗加权风险比(HRIPTW)的逆概率。我们纳入了4124例经CAG评估无CAD的糖尿病患者,其中2474例(60%)接受阿司匹林治疗,2916例(71%)在CAG后6个月内接受他汀类药物治疗。中位随访时间为4.9年。与未接受阿司匹林治疗的患者相比,阿司匹林没有降低10年MACE[21.3%对21.8%,HRIPTW 1.01, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.82-1.25]、全因死亡(HRIPTW 0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.23)或出血(HRIPTW 0.95, 95% CI 0.73-1.23)。与未接受他汀类药物治疗的患者相比,他汀类药物治疗降低了MACE (25% vs 37%, HRIPTW 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70)。结论:在无阻塞性CAD的糖尿病患者中,阿司匹林既没有降低MACE,也没有增加出血。相反,他汀类药物治疗与MACE风险的显著降低相关。