Prescribing errors among adult patients in a large tertiary care system in Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2021-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-01 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2021.147
Maryam Ali Alharaibi, Abdullah A Alhifany, Yousif A Asiri, Monira M Alwhaibi, Sheraz Ali, Parameaswari P Jaganathan, Tariq M Alhawassi
{"title":"Prescribing errors among adult patients in a large tertiary care system in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Maryam Ali Alharaibi,&nbsp;Abdullah A Alhifany,&nbsp;Yousif A Asiri,&nbsp;Monira M Alwhaibi,&nbsp;Sheraz Ali,&nbsp;Parameaswari P Jaganathan,&nbsp;Tariq M Alhawassi","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2021.147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple studies have investigated medication errors in hospitals in Saudi Arabia; however, prevalence data on prescribing errors and associated factors remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the prevalence, type, severity, and factors associated with prescribing errors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective database review.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Large tertiary care setting in Riyadh.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We described and analyzed data related to prescribing errors in adults (>14 years of age) from the Medication Error Electronic Report Forms database for the two-year period from January 2017 to December 2018.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>The prevalence of prescribing errors and associated factors among adult patients.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>315 166 prescriptions screened.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total number of inpatient and outpatient prescriptions screened, 4934 prescribing errors were identified for a prevalence of 1.56%. The most prevalent types of prescribing errors were improper dose (n=1516; 30.7%) and frequency (n=987; 20.0%). Two-thirds of prescribing errors did not cause any harm to patients. Most prescribing errors were made by medical residents (n=2577; 52%) followed by specialists (n=1629; 33%). Prescribing errors were associated with a lack of documenting clinical information (adjusted odds ratio: 14.1; 95% CI 7.7-16.8, <i>P</i><.001) and prescribing anti-infective medications (adjusted odds ratio 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-5.7, <i>P</i><.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inadequate documentation in electronic health records and prescribing of anti-infective medications were the most common factors for predicting prescribing errors. Future studies should focus on testing innovative measures to control these factors and their impact on minimizing prescribing errors.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Polypharmacy was not considered; the data are from a single healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":"41 3","pages":"147-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/db/1b/0256-4947.2021.147.PMC8176371.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2021.147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies have investigated medication errors in hospitals in Saudi Arabia; however, prevalence data on prescribing errors and associated factors remains uncertain.

Objective: Assess the prevalence, type, severity, and factors associated with prescribing errors.

Design: Retrospective database review.

Setting: Large tertiary care setting in Riyadh.

Patients and methods: We described and analyzed data related to prescribing errors in adults (>14 years of age) from the Medication Error Electronic Report Forms database for the two-year period from January 2017 to December 2018.

Main outcome measure: The prevalence of prescribing errors and associated factors among adult patients.

Sample size: 315 166 prescriptions screened.

Results: Of the total number of inpatient and outpatient prescriptions screened, 4934 prescribing errors were identified for a prevalence of 1.56%. The most prevalent types of prescribing errors were improper dose (n=1516; 30.7%) and frequency (n=987; 20.0%). Two-thirds of prescribing errors did not cause any harm to patients. Most prescribing errors were made by medical residents (n=2577; 52%) followed by specialists (n=1629; 33%). Prescribing errors were associated with a lack of documenting clinical information (adjusted odds ratio: 14.1; 95% CI 7.7-16.8, P<.001) and prescribing anti-infective medications (adjusted odds ratio 2.9; 95% CI 1.3-5.7, P<.01).

Conclusion: Inadequate documentation in electronic health records and prescribing of anti-infective medications were the most common factors for predicting prescribing errors. Future studies should focus on testing innovative measures to control these factors and their impact on minimizing prescribing errors.

Limitations: Polypharmacy was not considered; the data are from a single healthcare system.

Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在沙特阿拉伯的一个大型三级保健系统成人患者的处方错误。
背景:多项研究调查了沙特阿拉伯医院的用药错误;然而,关于处方错误和相关因素的流行数据仍然不确定。目的:评估处方错误的发生率、类型、严重程度和相关因素。设计:回顾性数据库审查。环境:利雅得大型三级医疗机构。患者和方法:我们描述并分析了2017年1月至2018年12月两年期间药物错误电子报表数据库中成人(>14岁)的处方错误相关数据。主要结局指标:成人患者中处方错误发生率及相关因素。样本量:筛选处方315 166张。结果:在筛选的住院和门诊处方中,发现处方错误4934张,患病率为1.56%。最常见的处方错误类型是剂量不当(n=1516;30.7%)和频率(n=987;20.0%)。三分之二的处方错误没有对患者造成任何伤害。大多数处方错误是由住院医师造成的(n=2577;52%),其次是专科医生(n=1629;33%)。处方错误与缺乏临床资料记录相关(校正优势比:14.1;结论:电子健康记录文件不足和抗感染药物处方是预测处方错误的最常见因素。未来的研究应侧重于测试创新措施,以控制这些因素及其对减少处方错误的影响。局限性:未考虑多药;这些数据来自单一的医疗保健系统。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信