Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of LAG-3 Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.

Elisabeth S Stovgaard, Iben Kümler, Kamille List-Jensen, Anne Roslind, Ib J Christensen, Estrid Høgdall, Dorte Nielsen, Eva Balslev
{"title":"Prognostic and Clinicopathologic Associations of LAG-3 Expression in Triple-negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Elisabeth S Stovgaard,&nbsp;Iben Kümler,&nbsp;Kamille List-Jensen,&nbsp;Anne Roslind,&nbsp;Ib J Christensen,&nbsp;Estrid Høgdall,&nbsp;Dorte Nielsen,&nbsp;Eva Balslev","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000000954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The immune checkpoint molecule lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is currently being investigated as a possible target for immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), frequently as an addition to treatment with programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition. However, expression of LAG-3, the frequency of coexpression with PD-L1, and the prognostic significance of this marker have not been studied extensively in TNBC. For this study, tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical specimens of 514 patients with TNBC. TMAs were stained immunohistochemically for LAG-3 and PD-L1 expression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated on full glass slides. LAG-3 expression was significantly associated with improved overall survival and relapse-free survival. When adjusted for clinicopathologic factors, each increment of 10 LAG-3-positive intratumoral lymphocytes per TMA core was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio=0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.97, P=0.002), and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.97, P=0.002). PD-L1 expression on immune cells and PD-L1 expression evaluated with the combined positive score and TILs were also associated with improved survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was only associated with improved survival in univariate analysis. LAG-3 expression was associated with both TILs and PD-L1 expression. Coexpression of LAG-3 and PD-L1 did not confer additional survival benefits. In conclusion, LAG-3 expression is associated with improved survival in TNBC. LAG-3 is often coexpressed with PD-L1, confirming that TNBC is likely a suitable candidate for cotreatment with LAG-3 and programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, coexpression does not confer additional survival benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":520562,"journal":{"name":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","volume":" ","pages":"62-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The immune checkpoint molecule lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) is currently being investigated as a possible target for immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), frequently as an addition to treatment with programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition. However, expression of LAG-3, the frequency of coexpression with PD-L1, and the prognostic significance of this marker have not been studied extensively in TNBC. For this study, tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from surgical specimens of 514 patients with TNBC. TMAs were stained immunohistochemically for LAG-3 and PD-L1 expression. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were evaluated on full glass slides. LAG-3 expression was significantly associated with improved overall survival and relapse-free survival. When adjusted for clinicopathologic factors, each increment of 10 LAG-3-positive intratumoral lymphocytes per TMA core was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio=0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-0.97, P=0.002), and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio=0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.85-0.97, P=0.002). PD-L1 expression on immune cells and PD-L1 expression evaluated with the combined positive score and TILs were also associated with improved survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was only associated with improved survival in univariate analysis. LAG-3 expression was associated with both TILs and PD-L1 expression. Coexpression of LAG-3 and PD-L1 did not confer additional survival benefits. In conclusion, LAG-3 expression is associated with improved survival in TNBC. LAG-3 is often coexpressed with PD-L1, confirming that TNBC is likely a suitable candidate for cotreatment with LAG-3 and programmed cell death protein 1/PD-L1 inhibitors. However, coexpression does not confer additional survival benefits.

LAG-3在三阴性乳腺癌中的表达与预后及临床病理关系
免疫检查点分子淋巴细胞激活基因3 (LAG-3)目前正在研究作为三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)免疫治疗的可能靶点,通常作为程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)抑制治疗的补充。然而,LAG-3的表达、与PD-L1共表达的频率以及该标志物在TNBC中的预后意义尚未得到广泛研究。在这项研究中,组织微阵列(tma)从514例TNBC患者的手术标本中构建。免疫组织化学染色tma检测LAG-3和PD-L1的表达。在全玻片上评估肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(til)。LAG-3的表达与总生存率和无复发生存率显著相关。经临床病理因素调整后,每TMA核心每增加10个lag -3阳性瘤内淋巴细胞与总生存率(风险比=0.93,95%可信区间:0.89-0.97,P=0.002)和无复发生存率(风险比=0.91,95%可信区间:0.85-0.97,P=0.002)相关。在单因素和多因素分析中,免疫细胞上的PD-L1表达以及用联合阳性评分和TILs评估的PD-L1表达也与生存率的提高有关。在单因素分析中,肿瘤细胞上PD-L1的表达仅与生存率的提高相关。LAG-3表达与TILs和PD-L1表达均相关。LAG-3和PD-L1的共表达并没有带来额外的生存益处。总之,LAG-3的表达与TNBC患者生存率的提高有关。LAG-3通常与PD-L1共表达,证实TNBC可能是LAG-3和程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/PD-L1抑制剂共治疗的合适候选。然而,共表达并不会带来额外的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信