Implementation fidelity of the Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC): a process evaluation study.

Hyoungshim Choi, Young-Il Jung, Hongsoo Kim
{"title":"Implementation fidelity of the Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC): a process evaluation study.","authors":"Hyoungshim Choi,&nbsp;Young-Il Jung,&nbsp;Hongsoo Kim","doi":"10.1186/s13012-021-01113-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC), a complex intervention, was conducted to examine its effectiveness as a technology-enhanced, multidisciplinary, and integrated care model for frail older persons among ten nursing homes (NHs) in South Korea where formal long-term care has recently been introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the SPEC intervention and to identify moderating factors that influence the implementation fidelity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a process evaluation based on an evidence-based framework for implementation fidelity using a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data from consultant logbooks, NH documentations, an information and communications technology (ICT) system, and a standardized questionnaire were collected from April 2015 to December 2016 and analyzed by calculating the descriptive statistics. Semi-structured focus group interviews were held with multidisciplinary teams from the participating NHs. Qualitative data from a semi-structured questionnaire and the focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SPEC program demonstrated good implementation fidelity, and adherence to the SPEC program was strong in all aspects, such as content, coverage, frequency, and duration. Of the participating on-site coordinators, 60% reported that the SPEC model positively impacted needs assessment and the reporting system for resident care. The important facilitating factors were tailored facilitating strategies, assurance of the quality of delivery, and recruitment strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effectiveness of the SPEC program was driven by good implementation fidelity. The key factors of good implementation fidelity were tailored delivery of evidence-based interventions over process evaluation work, facilitating strategies, and ICT support. Larger implementation studies with a more user-friendly ICT system are recommended.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11972147 . Registered on 16 March 2015.</p>","PeriodicalId":417097,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science : IS","volume":" ","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13012-021-01113-3","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science : IS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-021-01113-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: The Systems for Person-Centered Elder Care (SPEC), a complex intervention, was conducted to examine its effectiveness as a technology-enhanced, multidisciplinary, and integrated care model for frail older persons among ten nursing homes (NHs) in South Korea where formal long-term care has recently been introduced. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation fidelity of the SPEC intervention and to identify moderating factors that influence the implementation fidelity.

Methods: This study was a process evaluation based on an evidence-based framework for implementation fidelity using a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data from consultant logbooks, NH documentations, an information and communications technology (ICT) system, and a standardized questionnaire were collected from April 2015 to December 2016 and analyzed by calculating the descriptive statistics. Semi-structured focus group interviews were held with multidisciplinary teams from the participating NHs. Qualitative data from a semi-structured questionnaire and the focus group interviews were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: The SPEC program demonstrated good implementation fidelity, and adherence to the SPEC program was strong in all aspects, such as content, coverage, frequency, and duration. Of the participating on-site coordinators, 60% reported that the SPEC model positively impacted needs assessment and the reporting system for resident care. The important facilitating factors were tailored facilitating strategies, assurance of the quality of delivery, and recruitment strategies.

Conclusion: The effectiveness of the SPEC program was driven by good implementation fidelity. The key factors of good implementation fidelity were tailored delivery of evidence-based interventions over process evaluation work, facilitating strategies, and ICT support. Larger implementation studies with a more user-friendly ICT system are recommended.

Trial registration: ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11972147 . Registered on 16 March 2015.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以人为本的长者照护系统之实施保真度:一项过程评估研究。
背景:以人为中心的老年人护理系统(SPEC)是一项复杂的干预措施,旨在研究其作为技术增强、多学科综合护理模式在韩国10家疗养院(NHs)中的有效性,韩国最近引入了正式的长期护理。本研究的目的是评估SPEC干预的实施保真度,并找出影响实施保真度的调节因素。方法:本研究采用混合方法设计,基于基于证据的实施保真度框架进行过程评估。从2015年4月至2016年12月收集咨询师日志、NH文件、信息和通信技术(ICT)系统和标准化问卷的定量数据,并通过计算描述性统计进行分析。与参与NHs的多学科团队进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈。采用内容分析法对半结构化问卷和焦点小组访谈的定性数据进行分析。结果:SPEC方案表现出良好的实施保真度,并且在内容、覆盖范围、频率和持续时间等各方面对SPEC方案的依从性都很强。在参与的现场协调员中,60%的人报告说,SPEC模型对住院护理的需求评估和报告系统产生了积极的影响。重要的促进因素是量身定制的促进策略、保证交付质量和招聘策略。结论:良好的实施保真度驱动了SPEC程序的有效性。实现良好保真度的关键因素是有针对性地提供基于证据的干预措施,而不是过程评估工作、促进战略和ICT支持。建议采用更方便用户使用的信通技术系统进行更大规模的实施研究。试验注册:ISRCTN注册中心,ISRCTN11972147。于2015年3月16日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信