Attitudes and practices towards palliative care in chronic heart failure: a survey of cardiovascular nurses and physicians.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-28 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1928522
Gursharan K Singh, Caleb Ferguson, Patricia M Davidson, Phillip J Newton
{"title":"Attitudes and practices towards palliative care in chronic heart failure: a survey of cardiovascular nurses and physicians.","authors":"Gursharan K Singh,&nbsp;Caleb Ferguson,&nbsp;Patricia M Davidson,&nbsp;Phillip J Newton","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1928522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure is a chronic condition with various implications for individuals and families. Although the importance of implementing palliative care is recommended in best practice guidelines, implementation strategies are less clear.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study sought to; (1) determine Australian and New Zealand cardiovascular nurses and physicians' end of life care attitudes and specialist palliative care referral in heart failure and; (2) determine self-reported delivery of supportive care and attitudes towards service names.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was emailed to members of four peak bodies and professional networks. Participants were also recruited through social media. Paper-based versions of the survey were completed by attendees of the 66th Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting, August 2018.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were 113 completed responses included in the analyses. Participants were nurses (<i>n</i> = 75), physicians (<i>n</i> = 32) and allied health professionals (<i>n</i> = 4). Most (67%) reported they were comfortable with providing end of life care; however, fewer respondents agreed they received support for their dying patients and one-third experienced a sense of failure when heart failure progressed. Most (84-100%) participants agreed they would refer a heart failure patient later in the illness trajectory. There was a more favourable attitude towards the service name 'supportive care' than to 'palliative care'.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Comfort with end of life discussions is encouraging as it may lead to a greater likelihood of planning future care and identifying palliative care needs. Peer support and supervision may be useful for addressing feelings of failure. The use of needs-based assessment tools, adopting the service name 'supportive care' and further research focusing on primary palliative team-based approach is required to improve palliative care access.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>Cardiovascular nurses and physicians are comfortable providing end of life care, but referrals to palliative care in the later stages of heart failure persists.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 1-2","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10376178.2021.1928522","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1928522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Heart failure is a chronic condition with various implications for individuals and families. Although the importance of implementing palliative care is recommended in best practice guidelines, implementation strategies are less clear.

Aims: This study sought to; (1) determine Australian and New Zealand cardiovascular nurses and physicians' end of life care attitudes and specialist palliative care referral in heart failure and; (2) determine self-reported delivery of supportive care and attitudes towards service names.

Methods: An electronic survey was emailed to members of four peak bodies and professional networks. Participants were also recruited through social media. Paper-based versions of the survey were completed by attendees of the 66th Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting, August 2018.

Findings: There were 113 completed responses included in the analyses. Participants were nurses (n = 75), physicians (n = 32) and allied health professionals (n = 4). Most (67%) reported they were comfortable with providing end of life care; however, fewer respondents agreed they received support for their dying patients and one-third experienced a sense of failure when heart failure progressed. Most (84-100%) participants agreed they would refer a heart failure patient later in the illness trajectory. There was a more favourable attitude towards the service name 'supportive care' than to 'palliative care'.

Conclusion: Comfort with end of life discussions is encouraging as it may lead to a greater likelihood of planning future care and identifying palliative care needs. Peer support and supervision may be useful for addressing feelings of failure. The use of needs-based assessment tools, adopting the service name 'supportive care' and further research focusing on primary palliative team-based approach is required to improve palliative care access.

Impact statement: Cardiovascular nurses and physicians are comfortable providing end of life care, but referrals to palliative care in the later stages of heart failure persists.

对慢性心力衰竭患者姑息治疗的态度和做法:对心血管护士和医生的调查。
背景:心力衰竭是一种慢性疾病,对个人和家庭有多种影响。尽管最佳实践指南建议实施姑息治疗的重要性,但实施战略却不太明确。目的:本研究旨在;(1)确定澳大利亚和新西兰心血管护士和医生对心力衰竭的临终关怀态度和专科姑息治疗转诊;(2)确定自我报告的支持性护理的提供和对服务名称的态度。方法:通过电子邮件向四个高峰机构和专业网络的成员发送电子调查。参与者也是通过社交媒体招募的。该调查的纸质版本由2018年8月第66届澳大利亚和新西兰心脏学会年度科学会议的与会者完成。结果:有113个完整的回复被纳入分析。参与者是护士(n = 75)、医生(n = 32)和专职卫生专业人员(n = 4)。大多数人(67%)表示,他们对提供临终关怀感到满意;然而,更少的受访者认为他们得到了临终病人的支持,三分之一的人在心力衰竭恶化时感到失败。大多数(84-100%)参与者同意他们会在病情发展的后期转诊心力衰竭患者。与“姑息治疗”相比,“支持性护理”服务名称更受欢迎。结论:临终关怀的讨论是令人鼓舞的,因为它可能导致规划未来护理和确定姑息治疗需求的更大可能性。同伴的支持和监督可能对解决失败感很有用。需要使用基于需求的评估工具,采用“支持性护理”的服务名称,并进一步研究以初级姑息治疗团队为基础的方法,以改善姑息治疗的可及性。影响陈述:心血管病护士和医生乐于提供临终关怀,但在心力衰竭的晚期仍然需要姑息治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信