Opinions of key stakeholders regarding the inpatient Individual Care Plan.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-10 DOI:10.1017/ipm.2021.29
A Nikkhah, B Hallahan, C McDonald
{"title":"Opinions of key stakeholders regarding the inpatient Individual Care Plan.","authors":"A Nikkhah, B Hallahan, C McDonald","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In Ireland, regularly reviewed Individual Care Plans (ICPs) for inpatients at all acute psychiatric inpatient units are a requirement of the Mental Health Act . In this study, we comprehensively evaluated and compared opinions of key stakeholders in relation to the ICP as a care delivery tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a descriptive survey design. Questionnaires were distributed to 123 stakeholders (patients and mental health professionals (MHPs)) to evaluate and compare opinions regarding the impact of the ICP in relation to healthcare delivery and health outcomes, and regarding the structure and frequency of use of the ICP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight stakeholders (80%) completed study questionnaires. Stakeholders (patients (58%) and MHPs (85%)) reported that the ICP assisted in healthcare delivery. However, different attitudes between groups were noted in relation to whether the ICP contributed towards healthcare outcomes, with 64% of patients, but only 41% of MHPs reporting that the ICP positively contributed to mental healthcare outcomes. Some free-text comments described patient dissatisfaction with the role of the ICP for healthcare delivery, and MHP dissatisfaction that the ICP was time-consuming and did not significantly enhance standard patient care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Whilst the implementation of the ICP is generally viewed positively by both patients and MHPs, considerable dissatisfaction by MHPs was also noted with certain aspects of how the ICP was delivered in practice. Practical adjustments to the implementation of ICP in order to build more positive stakeholder experiences appear warranted and worthy of further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2021.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In Ireland, regularly reviewed Individual Care Plans (ICPs) for inpatients at all acute psychiatric inpatient units are a requirement of the Mental Health Act . In this study, we comprehensively evaluated and compared opinions of key stakeholders in relation to the ICP as a care delivery tool.

Methods: We employed a descriptive survey design. Questionnaires were distributed to 123 stakeholders (patients and mental health professionals (MHPs)) to evaluate and compare opinions regarding the impact of the ICP in relation to healthcare delivery and health outcomes, and regarding the structure and frequency of use of the ICP.

Results: Ninety-eight stakeholders (80%) completed study questionnaires. Stakeholders (patients (58%) and MHPs (85%)) reported that the ICP assisted in healthcare delivery. However, different attitudes between groups were noted in relation to whether the ICP contributed towards healthcare outcomes, with 64% of patients, but only 41% of MHPs reporting that the ICP positively contributed to mental healthcare outcomes. Some free-text comments described patient dissatisfaction with the role of the ICP for healthcare delivery, and MHP dissatisfaction that the ICP was time-consuming and did not significantly enhance standard patient care.

Conclusion: Whilst the implementation of the ICP is generally viewed positively by both patients and MHPs, considerable dissatisfaction by MHPs was also noted with certain aspects of how the ICP was delivered in practice. Practical adjustments to the implementation of ICP in order to build more positive stakeholder experiences appear warranted and worthy of further research.

主要利益相关者对住院病人个人护理计划的意见。
目的:在爱尔兰,《2001 年精神健康法案》规定,所有急诊精神病住院病房的住院病人都必须定期复查个人护理计划(ICP)。在这项研究中,我们全面评估并比较了主要利益相关者对 ICP 这一护理工具的看法:我们采用了描述性调查设计。我们向 123 名利益相关者(患者和精神卫生专业人员(MHPs))发放了调查问卷,以评估和比较有关 ICP 对医疗服务和健康结果的影响,以及有关 ICP 的结构和使用频率的意见:98 位利益相关者(80%)填写了研究问卷。利益相关者(患者(58%)和医护人员(85%))表示,比较方案有助于提供医疗服务。然而,对于 ICP 是否有助于医疗保健成果,不同群体的态度有所不同,64%的患者表示 ICP 对精神医疗保健成果做出了积极贡献,但只有 41% 的 MHPs 表示 ICP 对精神医疗保健成果做出了积极贡献。一些自由文本评论描述了患者对 ICP 在医疗保健服务中的作用的不满,以及精神卫生保健人员对 ICP 耗时且并未显著提高患者标准护理的不满:虽然患者和医疗保健人员对 ICP 的实施普遍持积极态度,但也注意到医疗保健人员对 ICP 在实践中的某些实施方式相当不满。看来有必要对 ICP 的实施进行实际调整,以便为利益相关者带来更积极的体验,这值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信