Accurate prediction of HbA1c by continuous glucose monitoring using a kinetic model with patient-specific parameters for red blood cell lifespan and glucose uptake.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Yongjin Xu, Yushi Hirota, Ramzi A Ajjan, Akane Yamamoto, Atsuko Matsuoka, Wataru Ogawa, Timothy C Dunn
{"title":"Accurate prediction of HbA1c by continuous glucose monitoring using a kinetic model with patient-specific parameters for red blood cell lifespan and glucose uptake.","authors":"Yongjin Xu,&nbsp;Yushi Hirota,&nbsp;Ramzi A Ajjan,&nbsp;Akane Yamamoto,&nbsp;Atsuko Matsuoka,&nbsp;Wataru Ogawa,&nbsp;Timothy C Dunn","doi":"10.1177/14791641211013734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent kinetic model proposed a new individualized glycaemic marker, calculated HbA1c (cHbA1c), based on kinetic parameters and glucose levels that are specific to each person. The aims of the current work were to validate the accuracy of this glucose metric for clinical use and evaluate data requirements for the estimation of personal kinetic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved HbA1c and glucose data from a group of 51 Japanese T1D patients under sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Two patient-specific kinetic parameters were identified by data sections, defined as continuous glucose data between two laboratory HbA1c measurements. The cHbA1c was prospectively validated employing subsequent HbA1c data that were not originally used to determine personal kinetic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to estimated HbA1c (eHbA1c) and glucose management indicator (GMI), cHbA1c showed clinically relevant accuracy improvement, with 20% or more within ±0.5% (±5.5 mmol/mol) of laboratory HbA1c. The mean absolute deviation of the cHbA1c calculation was 0.11% (1.2 mmol/mol), substantially less than for eHbA1c and GMI at 0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol) and 0.47% (5.1 mmol/mol), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows superior performance of cHbA1c compared with eHbA1c and GMI at reflecting laboratory HbA1c, making it a credible glucose metric for routine clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":11092,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","volume":"18 3","pages":"14791641211013734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14791641211013734","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14791641211013734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: A recent kinetic model proposed a new individualized glycaemic marker, calculated HbA1c (cHbA1c), based on kinetic parameters and glucose levels that are specific to each person. The aims of the current work were to validate the accuracy of this glucose metric for clinical use and evaluate data requirements for the estimation of personal kinetic factors.

Methods: We retrieved HbA1c and glucose data from a group of 51 Japanese T1D patients under sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy. Two patient-specific kinetic parameters were identified by data sections, defined as continuous glucose data between two laboratory HbA1c measurements. The cHbA1c was prospectively validated employing subsequent HbA1c data that were not originally used to determine personal kinetic parameters.

Results: Compared to estimated HbA1c (eHbA1c) and glucose management indicator (GMI), cHbA1c showed clinically relevant accuracy improvement, with 20% or more within ±0.5% (±5.5 mmol/mol) of laboratory HbA1c. The mean absolute deviation of the cHbA1c calculation was 0.11% (1.2 mmol/mol), substantially less than for eHbA1c and GMI at 0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol) and 0.47% (5.1 mmol/mol), respectively.

Conclusion: Our study shows superior performance of cHbA1c compared with eHbA1c and GMI at reflecting laboratory HbA1c, making it a credible glucose metric for routine clinical use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用具有患者特异性红细胞寿命和葡萄糖摄取参数的动力学模型,通过持续血糖监测准确预测HbA1c。
背景:最近的一项动力学模型提出了一种新的个体化血糖标志物,计算HbA1c (cHbA1c),基于每个人特定的动力学参数和葡萄糖水平。当前工作的目的是验证临床使用的葡萄糖测量的准确性,并评估估计个人动力学因素的数据需求。方法:我们检索了51名接受传感器增强泵(SAP)治疗的日本T1D患者的HbA1c和葡萄糖数据。通过数据切片确定两个患者特异性动力学参数,定义为两次实验室HbA1c测量之间的连续葡萄糖数据。cHbA1c采用后续HbA1c数据进行前瞻性验证,这些数据最初并未用于确定个人动力学参数。结果:与估计的HbA1c (eHbA1c)和葡萄糖管理指标(GMI)相比,cHbA1c具有临床相关的准确性提高,在实验室HbA1c±0.5%(±5.5 mmol/mol)范围内提高20%或更多。cHbA1c计算的平均绝对偏差为0.11% (1.2 mmol/mol),显著小于eHbA1c和GMI计算的0.54% (5.9 mmol/mol)和0.47% (5.1 mmol/mol)。结论:我们的研究显示cHbA1c在反映实验室HbA1c方面优于eHbA1c和GMI,使其成为临床常规使用的可靠血糖指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research
Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes & Vascular Disease Research is the first international peer-reviewed journal to unite diabetes and vascular disease in a single title. The journal publishes original papers, research letters and reviews. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信