Why do Irish pig farmers use medications? Barriers for effective reduction of antimicrobials in Irish pig production.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Alessia Diana, Sylvia Snijders, Alison Rieple, Laura Ann Boyle
{"title":"Why do Irish pig farmers use medications? Barriers for effective reduction of antimicrobials in Irish pig production.","authors":"Alessia Diana,&nbsp;Sylvia Snijders,&nbsp;Alison Rieple,&nbsp;Laura Ann Boyle","doi":"10.1186/s13620-021-00193-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In addressing the threat of antimicrobial resistance, it is critical to understand the barriers to the uptake of strategies for the reduction of antimicrobial use (AMU) in the pig industry. In several EU countries, factors such as education level, habits and social pressures are recognised as affecting farmers' decision-making process in relation to AMU. However, there is a lack of information on the Irish scenario. The aim of this study was to investigate pig farmers' perspectives and their behaviour towards AMU to identify potential barriers to effectively reduce AMU in Irish pig production. We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 30 pig farmers, 5 pig veterinarians and 4 focus groups of pig farm personnel. We employed qualitative analyses to explore the objective of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analysis revealed six convergent themes as potential barriers: perceptions about the need for AMU on farm, concept of animal welfare and associated management practices, legislation, culture, economics and standards of communication/type of advice-network. Overall, pig farmers believed that there is poor communication between stakeholders (i.e. farmers, vets and advisors) and a lack of reliable people to approach for advice. They considered themselves as operating responsibly in terms of AMU compared to their national and international colleagues and expressed the importance of a so-called 'Irish solution' to the problem of AMU because it was associated with what 'has always been done' and was therefore considered reliable and safe.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barriers and challenges were in line with those identified in other EU countries highlighting similarities in behavioural and attitudinal patterns among pig farmers. Overall, farmers appeared to be more likely to rely on previous experiences or to wait for an imposed change (e.g. legislation) instead of taking personal action. Thus, considerable behavioural and attitudinal changes are needed to adopt a more responsible AMU in Irish pig production and to develop effective intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54916,"journal":{"name":"Irish Veterinary Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13620-021-00193-3","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Veterinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13620-021-00193-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: In addressing the threat of antimicrobial resistance, it is critical to understand the barriers to the uptake of strategies for the reduction of antimicrobial use (AMU) in the pig industry. In several EU countries, factors such as education level, habits and social pressures are recognised as affecting farmers' decision-making process in relation to AMU. However, there is a lack of information on the Irish scenario. The aim of this study was to investigate pig farmers' perspectives and their behaviour towards AMU to identify potential barriers to effectively reduce AMU in Irish pig production. We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with 30 pig farmers, 5 pig veterinarians and 4 focus groups of pig farm personnel. We employed qualitative analyses to explore the objective of the study.

Results: Qualitative analysis revealed six convergent themes as potential barriers: perceptions about the need for AMU on farm, concept of animal welfare and associated management practices, legislation, culture, economics and standards of communication/type of advice-network. Overall, pig farmers believed that there is poor communication between stakeholders (i.e. farmers, vets and advisors) and a lack of reliable people to approach for advice. They considered themselves as operating responsibly in terms of AMU compared to their national and international colleagues and expressed the importance of a so-called 'Irish solution' to the problem of AMU because it was associated with what 'has always been done' and was therefore considered reliable and safe.

Conclusions: Barriers and challenges were in line with those identified in other EU countries highlighting similarities in behavioural and attitudinal patterns among pig farmers. Overall, farmers appeared to be more likely to rely on previous experiences or to wait for an imposed change (e.g. legislation) instead of taking personal action. Thus, considerable behavioural and attitudinal changes are needed to adopt a more responsible AMU in Irish pig production and to develop effective intervention strategies.

Abstract Image

为什么爱尔兰养猪户要用药?爱尔兰养猪生产中有效减少抗菌剂的障碍。
背景:在解决抗菌素耐药性的威胁时,了解在养猪业采取减少抗菌素使用(AMU)战略的障碍是至关重要的。在一些欧盟国家,教育水平、习惯和社会压力等因素被认为是影响农民与AMU相关的决策过程的因素。然而,缺乏关于爱尔兰情况的信息。本研究的目的是调查养猪户的观点和他们对AMU的行为,以确定有效减少爱尔兰养猪生产中AMU的潜在障碍。我们对30名养猪户、5名养猪兽医和4个养猪场人员焦点小组进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。我们采用定性分析来探讨研究的目的。结果:定性分析揭示了六个趋同的主题作为潜在障碍:对农场AMU需求的看法、动物福利概念和相关管理实践、立法、文化、经济和沟通标准/咨询网络类型。总体而言,养猪户认为利益相关者(即养猪户、兽医和顾问)之间的沟通不足,缺乏可靠的人来寻求建议。与国内和国际同行相比,他们认为自己在AMU方面是负责任的,并表达了所谓的“爱尔兰解决方案”对AMU问题的重要性,因为它与“一直在做”的事情有关,因此被认为是可靠和安全的。结论:障碍和挑战与其他欧盟国家所确定的一致,突出了养猪户行为和态度模式的相似性。总体而言,农民似乎更有可能依靠以前的经验或等待强加的变化(例如立法),而不是采取个人行动。因此,要在爱尔兰养猪生产中采用更负责任的AMU,并制定有效的干预策略,需要进行相当大的行为和态度改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Irish Veterinary Journal
Irish Veterinary Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Irish Veterinary Journal is an open access journal with a vision to make a substantial contribution to the dissemination of evidence-based knowledge that will promote optimal health and welfare of both domestic and wild species of animals. Irish Veterinary Journal has a clinical research focus with an emphasis on the effective management of health in both individual and populations of animals. Published studies will be relevant to both the international veterinary profession and veterinary scientists. Papers relating to veterinary education, veterinary ethics, veterinary public health, or relevant studies in the area of social science (participatory research) are also within the scope of Irish Veterinary Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信