Dynamics of Mud Blister Worm Infestation and Shell Repair by Oysters.

IF 2.1 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biological Bulletin Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-08 DOI:10.1086/713145
Kelly M Dorgan, Rachel D Moseley, Ellen Titus, Harrison Watson, Sarah M Cole, William Walton
{"title":"Dynamics of Mud Blister Worm Infestation and Shell Repair by Oysters.","authors":"Kelly M Dorgan,&nbsp;Rachel D Moseley,&nbsp;Ellen Titus,&nbsp;Harrison Watson,&nbsp;Sarah M Cole,&nbsp;William Walton","doi":"10.1086/713145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractMud blister worms bore into oyster shells; and oysters respond to shell penetration by secreting new layers of shell, resulting in mud blisters on inner surfaces of oyster shells. We conducted two experiments in off-bottom oyster farms along Alabama's coast in summer 2017 to explore the dynamics of worm infestation, blister formation, and shell repair. Results support our hypothesis that only a small proportion of worms that bore into oysters cause blisters. Triploid oysters had fewer blisters than diploids, likely because of faster growth and shell repair. We treated oysters to remove mud blister worms, redeployed them at intertidal and subtidal sites for nine weeks, and found that reinfestation by worms occurred only in subtidal oysters. Intertidally deployed oysters showed no visible blister coverage, indicating recovery, whereas blister coverage increased in subtidal oysters. Reinfestation of subtidal oysters was correlated with previous burrow damage, visualized with X-ray images, thus supporting our hypothesis that worms preferentially settle in previously infested shells. Forces required to break blisters, measured with a custom-built shucking knife with an integrated force sensor, were low relative to forces required to shuck oysters, possibly because our experiment was conducted when worm infestation was increasing. Higher forces were required to break smaller, lighter-colored blisters, consistent with blister recovery; but results were highly variable and not consistent across sites and sampling times, suggesting that size and color of blisters alone did not explain shell strength. Our results indicate that oysters repair shells slowly relative to more dynamic patterns of worm infestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":55376,"journal":{"name":"Biological Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713145","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

AbstractMud blister worms bore into oyster shells; and oysters respond to shell penetration by secreting new layers of shell, resulting in mud blisters on inner surfaces of oyster shells. We conducted two experiments in off-bottom oyster farms along Alabama's coast in summer 2017 to explore the dynamics of worm infestation, blister formation, and shell repair. Results support our hypothesis that only a small proportion of worms that bore into oysters cause blisters. Triploid oysters had fewer blisters than diploids, likely because of faster growth and shell repair. We treated oysters to remove mud blister worms, redeployed them at intertidal and subtidal sites for nine weeks, and found that reinfestation by worms occurred only in subtidal oysters. Intertidally deployed oysters showed no visible blister coverage, indicating recovery, whereas blister coverage increased in subtidal oysters. Reinfestation of subtidal oysters was correlated with previous burrow damage, visualized with X-ray images, thus supporting our hypothesis that worms preferentially settle in previously infested shells. Forces required to break blisters, measured with a custom-built shucking knife with an integrated force sensor, were low relative to forces required to shuck oysters, possibly because our experiment was conducted when worm infestation was increasing. Higher forces were required to break smaller, lighter-colored blisters, consistent with blister recovery; but results were highly variable and not consistent across sites and sampling times, suggesting that size and color of blisters alone did not explain shell strength. Our results indicate that oysters repair shells slowly relative to more dynamic patterns of worm infestation.

牡蛎对泥疱虫侵染及壳修复的动态研究。
摘要泥泡虫钻入牡蛎壳;牡蛎通过分泌新的壳层来应对壳的渗透,导致牡蛎壳的内表面出现泥泡。2017年夏天,我们在阿拉巴马州海岸的海底牡蛎养殖场进行了两项实验,以探索蠕虫感染、水泡形成和贝壳修复的动态。结果支持了我们的假设,即只有一小部分蠕虫钻进牡蛎会引起水泡。三倍体牡蛎比二倍体牡蛎有更少的水泡,可能是因为生长和外壳修复更快。我们对牡蛎进行处理,去除泥泡虫,将它们重新放置在潮间带和潮下地点9周,发现蠕虫只发生在潮下牡蛎中。潮间带部署的牡蛎没有明显的水疱覆盖,表明恢复,而潮下牡蛎的水疱覆盖增加。潮水下牡蛎的重新繁殖与之前的洞穴破坏有关,通过x射线图像可见,从而支持了我们的假设,即蠕虫优先定居在以前受感染的贝壳中。用带有集成力传感器的定制剥壳刀测量,破水泡所需的力相对于剥牡蛎所需的力较低,可能是因为我们的实验是在蠕虫侵扰增加的时候进行的。需要更大的力量来打破较小的、颜色较浅的水泡,这与水泡恢复一致;但结果变化很大,不同地点和采样时间的结果并不一致,这表明单凭水泡的大小和颜色并不能解释贝壳的强度。我们的研究结果表明,相对于蠕虫侵袭的动态模式,牡蛎修复壳的速度较慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Bulletin
Biological Bulletin 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Biological Bulletin disseminates novel scientific results in broadly related fields of biology in keeping with more than 100 years of a tradition of excellence. The Bulletin publishes outstanding original research with an overarching goal of explaining how organisms develop, function, and evolve in their natural environments. To that end, the journal publishes papers in the fields of Neurobiology and Behavior, Physiology and Biomechanics, Ecology and Evolution, Development and Reproduction, Cell Biology, Symbiosis and Systematics. The Bulletin emphasizes basic research on marine model systems but includes articles of an interdisciplinary nature when appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信