Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2021-05-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/5572181
S Pesenti, S Prost, A Muñoz McCausland, K Farah, P Tropiano, S Fuentes, B Blondel
{"title":"Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis.","authors":"S Pesenti,&nbsp;S Prost,&nbsp;A Muñoz McCausland,&nbsp;K Farah,&nbsp;P Tropiano,&nbsp;S Fuentes,&nbsp;B Blondel","doi":"10.1155/2021/5572181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to analyze results according to postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch in the management of adult spine deformity (ASD) patients. Recently, it has been reported that in addition to lumbar lordosis amount, lordosis repartition between its proximal and distal parts was crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 77 consecutive ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and deformity correction between 2015 and 2018. On preoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs, we analyzed different parameters such as L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, L1-L4 proximal lordosis (PLL), L4-S1 distal lordosis (DLL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL mismatch. Comparisons were performed according to postoperative PI-LL mismatch (defined as \"aligned\" when PI-LL was <10°). The relationship between lordosis distribution and postoperative alignment status was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the whole series, average lumbar lordosis, SVA, and PI-LL improved (28.2° vs.43.5°, 82 vs. 51 mm, and 26°vs. 14°, all <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, PT remained unchanged (30° vs. 28°, <i>p</i> > 0.05). 35 patients were classified as \"aligned\" and 42 as \"not aligned.\" Patients from the \"aligned\" group had a significantly lower PI than patients from the \"not aligned\" group (52° vs. 61°, <i>p</i>=0.009). Postoperative PLL was not different between groups (18° vs. 16° <i>p</i> > 0.05), whereas DLL was significantly higher in the \"aligned\" group (31° vs. 22°, <i>p</i>=0.003). PI-LL was significantly correlated to DLL (rho = 0.407, <i>p</i> < 0.001) but not with PLL (rho = 0.110, <i>p</i>=0.342).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results revealed that in ASD patients, postoperative malalignment was associated with a lack of DLL restoration. \"Not aligned\" patients had also a significantly higher pelvic incidence. Specific attention must be paid to restore optimal distal lumbar lordosis in order to set the amount and the distribution of optimal postoperative lumbar lordosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2021 ","pages":"5572181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8121594/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5572181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze results according to postoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch in the management of adult spine deformity (ASD) patients. Recently, it has been reported that in addition to lumbar lordosis amount, lordosis repartition between its proximal and distal parts was crucial.

Methods: We enrolled 77 consecutive ASD patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion and deformity correction between 2015 and 2018. On preoperative and 1-year follow-up radiographs, we analyzed different parameters such as L1-S1 lumbar lordosis, L1-L4 proximal lordosis (PLL), L4-S1 distal lordosis (DLL), pelvic tilt (PT), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and PI-LL mismatch. Comparisons were performed according to postoperative PI-LL mismatch (defined as "aligned" when PI-LL was <10°). The relationship between lordosis distribution and postoperative alignment status was investigated.

Results: On the whole series, average lumbar lordosis, SVA, and PI-LL improved (28.2° vs.43.5°, 82 vs. 51 mm, and 26°vs. 14°, all p < 0.001, respectively). On the other hand, PT remained unchanged (30° vs. 28°, p > 0.05). 35 patients were classified as "aligned" and 42 as "not aligned." Patients from the "aligned" group had a significantly lower PI than patients from the "not aligned" group (52° vs. 61°, p=0.009). Postoperative PLL was not different between groups (18° vs. 16° p > 0.05), whereas DLL was significantly higher in the "aligned" group (31° vs. 22°, p=0.003). PI-LL was significantly correlated to DLL (rho = 0.407, p < 0.001) but not with PLL (rho = 0.110, p=0.342).

Conclusions: Our results revealed that in ASD patients, postoperative malalignment was associated with a lack of DLL restoration. "Not aligned" patients had also a significantly higher pelvic incidence. Specific attention must be paid to restore optimal distal lumbar lordosis in order to set the amount and the distribution of optimal postoperative lumbar lordosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

成人脊柱畸形的最佳矫正需要恢复远端腰椎前凸。
目的:本研究的目的是分析成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者术后骨盆发生率-腰椎前凸(PI-LL)不匹配的治疗结果。最近有报道称,除了腰椎前凸程度外,前凸在近端和远端之间的再分配也是至关重要的。方法:我们在2015年至2018年期间连续招募了77名接受后路脊柱融合术和畸形矫正的ASD患者。在术前和1年随访的x线片上,我们分析了不同的参数,如L1-S1腰椎前凸、L1-L4近端前凸(PLL)、L4-S1远端前凸(DLL)、骨盆倾斜(PT)、矢状垂直轴(SVA)和PI-LL不匹配。结果:在整个系列中,平均腰椎前凸、SVA和PI-LL均得到改善(28.2°vs.43.5°,82°vs. 51 mm, 26°vs. 51 mm)。14°,均p < 0.001)。另一方面,PT保持不变(30°vs 28°,p > 0.05)。35名患者被分类为“对齐”,42名患者被分类为“未对齐”。“对齐”组患者的PI明显低于“未对齐”组患者(52°vs 61°,p=0.009)。术后PLL组间无差异(18°vs. 16°p > 0.05),而“对齐”组的DLL明显更高(31°vs. 22°,p=0.003)。PI-LL与DLL有显著相关性(rho = 0.407, p < 0.001),与PLL无显著相关性(rho = 0.110, p=0.342)。结论:我们的研究结果显示,在ASD患者中,术后不对齐与缺乏DLL修复有关。“未对齐”患者的骨盆发生率也明显较高。必须特别注意恢复最佳远端腰椎前凸,以便确定术后最佳腰椎前凸的量和分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信