Perioperative risk assessment - focus on functional capacity.

IF 2.1
Ciara Hanley, Duminda N Wijeysundera
{"title":"Perioperative risk assessment - focus on functional capacity.","authors":"Ciara Hanley,&nbsp;Duminda N Wijeysundera","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000000988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines how functional capacity informs preoperative risk stratification, as well as strengths and limitations of options for estimating functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Functional capacity (or cardiopulmonary fitness) overlaps with other important characteristics, including muscular strength, balance, and frailty. Poor functional capacity is associated with postoperative morbidity, especially noncardiovascular complications. Both patient interviews and exercise tests are used to assess functional capacity. The usual approach of an unstructured patient interview does not predict outcomes. Structured interviews that incorporate validated questionnaires (Duke Activity Status Index) or standardized questions about physical activity (ability to climb stairs) do predict moderate-or-severe complications and cardiovascular complications. Among exercise tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has shown the most consistent association with risks of complications. Other tests (6-min walk test, incremental shuttle walk test, stair climbing) might predict complications, but still require further high-quality evaluation.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A straightforward way to better assess functional capacity is a structured interview with validated questionnaires or standardized questions about physical activities. Functional capacity can also be assessed by exercise tests, with the strongest evidence supporting CPET. Although some simpler exercise tests have shown promise, more research remains needed to better define their role in preoperative evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"309-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review examines how functional capacity informs preoperative risk stratification, as well as strengths and limitations of options for estimating functional capacity.

Recent findings: Functional capacity (or cardiopulmonary fitness) overlaps with other important characteristics, including muscular strength, balance, and frailty. Poor functional capacity is associated with postoperative morbidity, especially noncardiovascular complications. Both patient interviews and exercise tests are used to assess functional capacity. The usual approach of an unstructured patient interview does not predict outcomes. Structured interviews that incorporate validated questionnaires (Duke Activity Status Index) or standardized questions about physical activity (ability to climb stairs) do predict moderate-or-severe complications and cardiovascular complications. Among exercise tests, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has shown the most consistent association with risks of complications. Other tests (6-min walk test, incremental shuttle walk test, stair climbing) might predict complications, but still require further high-quality evaluation.

Summary: A straightforward way to better assess functional capacity is a structured interview with validated questionnaires or standardized questions about physical activities. Functional capacity can also be assessed by exercise tests, with the strongest evidence supporting CPET. Although some simpler exercise tests have shown promise, more research remains needed to better define their role in preoperative evaluation.

围手术期风险评估-关注功能能力。
综述目的:本综述探讨了功能容量如何影响术前风险分层,以及评估功能容量的选择的优势和局限性。最近的发现:功能能力(或心肺适能)与其他重要特征重叠,包括肌肉力量、平衡和脆弱。功能差与术后并发症,尤其是非心血管并发症有关。病人访谈和运动测试都被用来评估功能能力。通常的非结构化病人访谈方法并不能预测结果。结构化访谈包括有效的问卷调查(杜克活动状态指数)或关于身体活动(爬楼梯的能力)的标准化问题,可以预测中度或重度并发症和心血管并发症。在运动测试中,心肺运动测试(CPET)显示出与并发症风险最一致的关联。其他测试(6分钟步行测试、增量穿梭行走测试、爬楼梯)可能预测并发症,但仍需要进一步的高质量评估。总结:更好地评估功能能力的一种直接方法是使用有效的问卷或关于体育活动的标准化问题进行结构化访谈。功能能力也可以通过运动测试来评估,最有力的证据支持CPET。尽管一些简单的运动测试显示出了希望,但仍需要更多的研究来更好地确定它们在术前评估中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信