Utility of a modified distress thermometer in screening COVID-19 patients for psychological distress: a prospective Egyptian study.

IF 2.3
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2021-04-22 eCollection Date: 2021-01-15 DOI:10.4081/mrm.2021.750
Sherif A A Mohamed, Azza AbdelHafeez, Ehab Kamel, Alaa Rashad
{"title":"Utility of a modified distress thermometer in screening COVID-19 patients for psychological distress: a prospective Egyptian study.","authors":"Sherif A A Mohamed, Azza AbdelHafeez, Ehab Kamel, Alaa Rashad","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2021.750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has adopted the distress thermometer (DT) as one of the best-known distress-screening instruments. We have adopted a modified version of the NCCN distress thermometer. We questioned if this modified DT (m-DT) could be utilized for measuring the prevalence of psychological distress among COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective study included 2 phases; modification of the original DT and its associated problem list (PL), and evaluation of this m-DT in measuring the prevalence of psychological distress among COVID-19 patients. Egyptian adult subjects with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 at 2 University Hospitals were enrolled. Binary logistic regression tests were carried out to explore the association between the m-DT cut-off scores of 4 and the clinical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty-nine (60.4%) patients experienced significant distress (m-DT cut off score ≥4). Logistic regression showed that occupation, presence of special habits, length of quarantine time, worry, cough, shortness of breath, and fever, were independent factors associated with significant distress in COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With the modified distress thermometer (m-DT), 60% of Egyptian COVID-19 patients experienced significant distress. This distress was significantly related to age, marital status, occupation, presence or absence of special habits, and length of the quarantine time. With m-DT, the current study had identified worry, being a health-care worker, shortness of breath, fever, length of quarantine time, presence of special habits, and cough as independent factors associated with significant distress in COVID-19 patients. Further studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49031,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/20/ae/mrm-16-1-750.PMC8082533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2021.750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has adopted the distress thermometer (DT) as one of the best-known distress-screening instruments. We have adopted a modified version of the NCCN distress thermometer. We questioned if this modified DT (m-DT) could be utilized for measuring the prevalence of psychological distress among COVID-19 patients.

Methods: The prospective study included 2 phases; modification of the original DT and its associated problem list (PL), and evaluation of this m-DT in measuring the prevalence of psychological distress among COVID-19 patients. Egyptian adult subjects with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 at 2 University Hospitals were enrolled. Binary logistic regression tests were carried out to explore the association between the m-DT cut-off scores of 4 and the clinical variables.

Results: One hundred sixty-nine (60.4%) patients experienced significant distress (m-DT cut off score ≥4). Logistic regression showed that occupation, presence of special habits, length of quarantine time, worry, cough, shortness of breath, and fever, were independent factors associated with significant distress in COVID-19 patients.

Conclusion: With the modified distress thermometer (m-DT), 60% of Egyptian COVID-19 patients experienced significant distress. This distress was significantly related to age, marital status, occupation, presence or absence of special habits, and length of the quarantine time. With m-DT, the current study had identified worry, being a health-care worker, shortness of breath, fever, length of quarantine time, presence of special habits, and cough as independent factors associated with significant distress in COVID-19 patients. Further studies are warranted.

Abstract Image

改良的痛苦温度计在筛查 COVID-19 患者心理痛苦中的实用性:一项埃及前瞻性研究。
背景:美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)将窘迫温度计(DT)作为最著名的窘迫筛查工具之一。我们采用了 NCCN 痛苦温度计的改良版。我们的问题是,能否利用这种改良版 DT(m-DT)来测量 COVID-19 患者的心理困扰发生率:前瞻性研究包括两个阶段:修改原始 DT 及其相关问题列表 (PL),以及评估该 m-DT 在测量 COVID-19 患者心理压力流行率时的效果。两家大学医院对疑似或确诊 COVID-19 病例的埃及成年受试者进行了登记。通过二元逻辑回归测试探讨了 m-DT 4 分临界值与临床变量之间的关联:结果:169 名(60.4%)患者经历了明显的痛苦(m-DT 临界分数≥4)。逻辑回归显示,职业、是否有特殊习惯、隔离时间长短、担心、咳嗽、呼吸急促和发烧是 COVID-19 患者出现明显不适的独立相关因素:结论:使用改良的窘迫感温度计(m-DT),60% 的埃及 COVID-19 患者出现了明显的窘迫感。这种痛苦与年龄、婚姻状况、职业、是否有特殊习惯以及隔离时间的长短有很大关系。通过 m-DT,目前的研究发现,担心、是医护人员、呼吸急促、发烧、检疫时间长短、有无特殊习惯和咳嗽是与 COVID-19 患者明显痛苦相关的独立因素。有必要开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信