Development and validation of portable, field-deployable Ebola virus point-of-encounter diagnostic assay for wildlife surveillance.

Dania M Figueroa, Eeva Kuisma, M Jeremiah Matson, Alain U Ondzie, Trent Bushmaker, Stephanie N Seifert, Francine Ntoumi, Beatriz Escudero-Pérez, César Muñoz-Fontela, Chris Walzer, Sarah H Olson, Cynthia Goma-Nkoua, Jean-Vivien Mombouli, Robert J Fischer, Vincent J Munster
{"title":"Development and validation of portable, field-deployable Ebola virus point-of-encounter diagnostic assay for wildlife surveillance.","authors":"Dania M Figueroa, Eeva Kuisma, M Jeremiah Matson, Alain U Ondzie, Trent Bushmaker, Stephanie N Seifert, Francine Ntoumi, Beatriz Escudero-Pérez, César Muñoz-Fontela, Chris Walzer, Sarah H Olson, Cynthia Goma-Nkoua, Jean-Vivien Mombouli, Robert J Fischer, Vincent J Munster","doi":"10.1186/s42522-021-00041-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of Ebola virus spillover into wildlife is crucial for rapid response. We developed and validated a portable, cold-chain independent Ebola virus RT-qPCR assay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The field syringe-based RNA extraction method was compared with a conventional laboratory-based spin-column RNA extraction method. Next, the qPCR efficiency and limit of detection of the assay was compared to standard laboratory-based reagents and equipment. The specificity of the assay was confirmed by testing against multiple Zaire Ebolavirus (EBOV) variants and other ebolavirus species. Lastly, swabs from an EBOV-infected non-human primate carcass, stored at environmental conditions mimicking central and west Africa, were analyzed to mimic in field conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The syringe-based RNA extraction method performed comparably to a standard laboratory spin-column-based method. The developed assay was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to standard laboratory-based diagnostic assays. The assay specifically detected EBOV and not any of the other tested ebolavirus species, including Reston ebolavirus, Sudan ebolavirus, Bundibugyo ebolavirus, and Tai Forrest ebolavirus. Notably, the assays limit of detection for EBOV isolates were all below 4 genome copies/μL. The assay was able to detect EBOV in oral, nasal, thoracic cavity, and conjunctiva swabs obtained from an infected non-human primate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We developed a field-based Ebolavirus assay which is comparable in sensitivity and specificity to laboratory-based assays. Currently, the assay is being incorporated into wildlife carcass surveillance in the Republic of the Congo and is being adapted for other infectious disease agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":19490,"journal":{"name":"One Health Outlook","volume":"3 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Health Outlook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-021-00041-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of Ebola virus spillover into wildlife is crucial for rapid response. We developed and validated a portable, cold-chain independent Ebola virus RT-qPCR assay.

Methods: The field syringe-based RNA extraction method was compared with a conventional laboratory-based spin-column RNA extraction method. Next, the qPCR efficiency and limit of detection of the assay was compared to standard laboratory-based reagents and equipment. The specificity of the assay was confirmed by testing against multiple Zaire Ebolavirus (EBOV) variants and other ebolavirus species. Lastly, swabs from an EBOV-infected non-human primate carcass, stored at environmental conditions mimicking central and west Africa, were analyzed to mimic in field conditions.

Results: The syringe-based RNA extraction method performed comparably to a standard laboratory spin-column-based method. The developed assay was comparable in sensitivity and specificity to standard laboratory-based diagnostic assays. The assay specifically detected EBOV and not any of the other tested ebolavirus species, including Reston ebolavirus, Sudan ebolavirus, Bundibugyo ebolavirus, and Tai Forrest ebolavirus. Notably, the assays limit of detection for EBOV isolates were all below 4 genome copies/μL. The assay was able to detect EBOV in oral, nasal, thoracic cavity, and conjunctiva swabs obtained from an infected non-human primate.

Conclusion: We developed a field-based Ebolavirus assay which is comparable in sensitivity and specificity to laboratory-based assays. Currently, the assay is being incorporated into wildlife carcass surveillance in the Republic of the Congo and is being adapted for other infectious disease agents.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

开发和验证用于野生动物监测的便携式、可实地部署的埃博拉病毒现场诊断测定。
早期检测埃博拉病毒是否扩散到野生动物体内对于快速反应至关重要。我们开发并验证了一种独立于冷链的便携式埃博拉病毒 RT-qPCR 检测方法:方法:将基于野外注射器的 RNA 提取方法与基于实验室旋转柱的传统 RNA 提取方法进行了比较。然后,将该检测方法的 qPCR 效率和检测限与实验室标准试剂和设备进行了比较。通过对多种扎伊尔伊波拉病毒(EBOV)变种和其他伊波拉病毒物种进行检测,确认了该检测方法的特异性。最后,在模拟非洲中部和西部的环境条件下,对从感染了 EBOV 的非人灵长类动物尸体上采集的拭子进行了分析:结果:基于注射器的 RNA 提取方法与基于实验室旋转柱的标准方法性能相当。所开发的检测方法在灵敏度和特异性方面与标准实验室诊断方法相当。该检测方法能特异性地检测出EBOV,而不能检测出其他被检测的伊波拉病毒,包括雷斯顿伊波拉病毒、苏丹伊波拉病毒、邦迪布京伊波拉病毒和大福雷斯特伊波拉病毒。值得注意的是,该检测方法对 EBOV 分离物的检测限均低于 4 个基因组拷贝/μL。该检测方法能够检测从受感染的非人灵长类动物口腔、鼻腔、胸腔和结膜拭子中分离出的埃博拉病毒:结论:我们开发了一种基于野外的埃博拉病毒检测方法,其灵敏度和特异性与基于实验室的检测方法相当。目前,该检测方法正被纳入刚果共和国的野生动物尸体监测中,并正被用于其他传染病病原体的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信