Well-being and sleep in stressful times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Relations to worrying and different coping strategies.

Christina Saalwirth, Bernhard Leipold
{"title":"Well-being and sleep in stressful times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Relations to worrying and different coping strategies.","authors":"Christina Saalwirth,&nbsp;Bernhard Leipold","doi":"10.1002/smi.3057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined the relationships between emotional well-being (positive and negative affect), sleep-related variables (sleep quality, sleep duration, and change in sleep quality and duration compared to weeks before lockdown), and worrying about coronavirus disease (COVID-19) challenges during the beginning of the outbreak in Europe. In addition, four different coping strategies were investigated. The study was conducted in Germany with data from 665 participants (53.8% female; 18-73 years), who completed an online questionnaire in April 2020. The results revealed that COVID-19 worry was associated with impaired well-being and sleep. Meaning- and problem-focused coping were the most frequently used coping strategies, and showed positive associations with well-being and sleep. Social and avoidance coping were associated with decreased well-being and worse sleep outcomes. Three coping strategies showed moderating effects. People who worried more showed higher levels of positive affect when they used problem-focused coping compared to those who did not. Similarly, highly worried participants showed lower levels of negative affect when they reported using meaning-focused coping more often. In contrast, social coping increased the risk of high negative affect levels in worried participants. In conclusion, problem-focused and meaning-focused coping strategies seemed to be most effective in coping with COVID-19 challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":" ","pages":"973-985"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/smi.3057","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

The present study examined the relationships between emotional well-being (positive and negative affect), sleep-related variables (sleep quality, sleep duration, and change in sleep quality and duration compared to weeks before lockdown), and worrying about coronavirus disease (COVID-19) challenges during the beginning of the outbreak in Europe. In addition, four different coping strategies were investigated. The study was conducted in Germany with data from 665 participants (53.8% female; 18-73 years), who completed an online questionnaire in April 2020. The results revealed that COVID-19 worry was associated with impaired well-being and sleep. Meaning- and problem-focused coping were the most frequently used coping strategies, and showed positive associations with well-being and sleep. Social and avoidance coping were associated with decreased well-being and worse sleep outcomes. Three coping strategies showed moderating effects. People who worried more showed higher levels of positive affect when they used problem-focused coping compared to those who did not. Similarly, highly worried participants showed lower levels of negative affect when they reported using meaning-focused coping more often. In contrast, social coping increased the risk of high negative affect levels in worried participants. In conclusion, problem-focused and meaning-focused coping strategies seemed to be most effective in coping with COVID-19 challenges.

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行压力时期的健康和睡眠:与担忧和不同应对策略的关系
本研究调查了情绪健康(积极和消极影响)、睡眠相关变量(睡眠质量、睡眠持续时间以及与封锁前几周相比睡眠质量和持续时间的变化)之间的关系,以及对冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)挑战的担忧在欧洲爆发之初。此外,还研究了四种不同的应对策略。该研究在德国进行,数据来自665名参与者(53.8%为女性;18-73岁),他们于2020年4月完成了一份在线问卷。结果显示,对COVID-19的担忧与幸福感和睡眠受损有关。以意义和问题为中心的应对是最常用的应对策略,与幸福感和睡眠呈正相关。社交和回避应对与幸福感下降和睡眠结果恶化有关。三种应对策略均有调节作用。忧虑的人在使用以问题为中心的应对方法时,比不使用这种方法的人表现出更高水平的积极影响。同样,当高度焦虑的参与者报告说他们更频繁地使用以意义为中心的应对方式时,他们表现出的负面影响水平较低。相反,社会应对增加了焦虑参与者产生高负面情绪水平的风险。总之,以问题为中心和以意义为中心的应对策略似乎在应对COVID-19挑战方面最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信