Which Aspects of the CanMEDS Competencies are Most Valued in Radiologists? Perspectives of Trainees From Other Specialties.

Stefanie Y Lee, Namita Sharma, Yoan K Kagoma, P Andrea Lum
{"title":"Which Aspects of the CanMEDS Competencies are Most Valued in Radiologists? Perspectives of Trainees From Other Specialties.","authors":"Stefanie Y Lee,&nbsp;Namita Sharma,&nbsp;Yoan K Kagoma,&nbsp;P Andrea Lum","doi":"10.1177/08465371211008649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiologists work primarily in collaboration with other healthcare professionals. As such, these stakeholder perspectives are of value to the development and assessment of educational outcomes during the transition to competency-based medical education. Our aim in this study was to determine which aspects of the Royal College CanMEDS competencies for diagnostic radiology are considered most important by future referring physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional ethics approval was obtained. After pilot testing, an anonymous online survey was sent to all residents and clinical fellows at our university. Open-ended questions asked respondents to describe the aspects of radiologist service they felt were most important. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was performed using a grounded theory approach. The resulting themes were mapped to the 2015 CanMEDS Key Competencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>115 completed surveys were received from residents and fellows from essentially all specialties and years of training (out of 928 invited). Major themes were 1) timeliness and accessibility of service, 2) quality of reporting, and 3) acting as a valued team member. The competencies identified as important by resident physicians were largely consistent with the CanMEDS framework, although not all key competencies were covered in the responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study illustrates how CanMEDS roles and competencies may be exemplified in a concrete and specialty-specific manner from the perspective of key stakeholders. Our survey results provide further insight into specific objectives for teaching and assessing these competencies in radiology residency training, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care through strengthened communication and working relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":444006,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/08465371211008649","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371211008649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Radiologists work primarily in collaboration with other healthcare professionals. As such, these stakeholder perspectives are of value to the development and assessment of educational outcomes during the transition to competency-based medical education. Our aim in this study was to determine which aspects of the Royal College CanMEDS competencies for diagnostic radiology are considered most important by future referring physicians.

Methods: Institutional ethics approval was obtained. After pilot testing, an anonymous online survey was sent to all residents and clinical fellows at our university. Open-ended questions asked respondents to describe the aspects of radiologist service they felt were most important. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was performed using a grounded theory approach. The resulting themes were mapped to the 2015 CanMEDS Key Competencies.

Results: 115 completed surveys were received from residents and fellows from essentially all specialties and years of training (out of 928 invited). Major themes were 1) timeliness and accessibility of service, 2) quality of reporting, and 3) acting as a valued team member. The competencies identified as important by resident physicians were largely consistent with the CanMEDS framework, although not all key competencies were covered in the responses.

Conclusions: This study illustrates how CanMEDS roles and competencies may be exemplified in a concrete and specialty-specific manner from the perspective of key stakeholders. Our survey results provide further insight into specific objectives for teaching and assessing these competencies in radiology residency training, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care through strengthened communication and working relationships.

放射医师最看重CanMEDS能力的哪些方面?其他专业学员的观点。
目的:放射科医生主要与其他医疗保健专业人员合作。因此,在向以能力为基础的医学教育过渡的过程中,这些利益相关者的观点对发展和评估教育成果很有价值。我们在这项研究中的目的是确定未来的转诊医生认为皇家学院CanMEDS诊断放射学能力的哪些方面最重要。方法:获得机构伦理批准。经过初步测试,我们向所有住院医师和临床研究员发送了一份匿名在线调查。开放式问题要求受访者描述他们认为最重要的放射科医生服务方面。使用扎根理论方法对自由文本回复进行主题分析。最终的主题被映射到2015年CanMEDS关键能力。结果:我们收到了115份完整的调查问卷,这些问卷来自所有专业和培训年限的住院医生和研究员(共928份邀请问卷)。主要的主题是1)服务的及时性和可及性,2)报告的质量,以及3)作为一个有价值的团队成员。住院医师认为重要的能力在很大程度上与CanMEDS框架一致,尽管并非所有关键能力都包含在回复中。结论:本研究说明了从关键利益相关者的角度出发,CanMEDS角色和能力如何以具体和特定的方式得到例证。我们的调查结果进一步深入了解了放射科住院医师培训中教学和评估这些能力的具体目标,最终目标是通过加强沟通和工作关系来改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信