Ishan Khan, Loan Bui, Robert Bachoo, Young-Tae Kim, Cheng-Jen Chuong
{"title":"Differences in creep response of GBM cells migrating in confinement.","authors":"Ishan Khan, Loan Bui, Robert Bachoo, Young-Tae Kim, Cheng-Jen Chuong","doi":"10.1080/23335432.2020.1757509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a microfluidic platform to apply negative aspiration pressure (-20, -25, -30, -35 and -40 cm H<sub>2</sub>O), we compared the differences in creep responses of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) cells while migrating in confinement and at a stationary state on a 2D substrate. Cells were either migrating in a channel of 5 x 5 μm cross-section or stationary at the entrance to the channel. In response to aspiration pressure, we found actively migrating GBM cells exhibited a higher stiffness than stationary cells. Additionally, migrating cells absorbed more energy elastically with a relatively small dissipative energy loss. At elevated negative pressure loads up to - 30 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, we observed a linear increase in elastic deformation and a higher distribution in elastic storage than energy loss, and the response plateaued at further increasing negative pressure loads. To explore the underlying cause, we carried out immuno-cytochemical studies of these cells and found a polarized actin and myosin distribution at the front and posterior ends of the migrating cells, whereas the distribution of the stationary group demonstrated no specific regional differences. These differences in creep response and cytoskeletal protein distribution demonstrate the importance of a migrating cell's kinematic state to the mechanism of cell migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":52124,"journal":{"name":"International Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"44-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23335432.2020.1757509","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23335432.2020.1757509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Using a microfluidic platform to apply negative aspiration pressure (-20, -25, -30, -35 and -40 cm H2O), we compared the differences in creep responses of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) cells while migrating in confinement and at a stationary state on a 2D substrate. Cells were either migrating in a channel of 5 x 5 μm cross-section or stationary at the entrance to the channel. In response to aspiration pressure, we found actively migrating GBM cells exhibited a higher stiffness than stationary cells. Additionally, migrating cells absorbed more energy elastically with a relatively small dissipative energy loss. At elevated negative pressure loads up to - 30 cm H2O, we observed a linear increase in elastic deformation and a higher distribution in elastic storage than energy loss, and the response plateaued at further increasing negative pressure loads. To explore the underlying cause, we carried out immuno-cytochemical studies of these cells and found a polarized actin and myosin distribution at the front and posterior ends of the migrating cells, whereas the distribution of the stationary group demonstrated no specific regional differences. These differences in creep response and cytoskeletal protein distribution demonstrate the importance of a migrating cell's kinematic state to the mechanism of cell migration.
利用微流控平台施加负压(-20、-25、-30、-35和-40 cm H2O),我们比较了多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)细胞在封闭和固定状态下在二维基质上迁移时蠕变反应的差异。细胞要么在5 × 5 μm的通道内移动,要么在通道入口处静止不动。在吸入压力下,我们发现主动迁移的GBM细胞比静止细胞表现出更高的刚度。此外,迁移细胞以相对较小的耗散能量损失弹性吸收更多的能量。当负压载荷升高至- 30 cm H2O时,我们观察到弹性变形呈线性增加,弹性储存的分布高于能量损失,并且在进一步增加负压载荷时响应趋于平稳。为了探究其根本原因,我们对这些细胞进行了免疫细胞化学研究,发现在迁移细胞的前后端有极化的肌动蛋白和肌球蛋白分布,而静止组的分布没有特定的区域差异。这些蠕变响应和细胞骨架蛋白分布的差异表明了迁移细胞的运动状态对细胞迁移机制的重要性。
期刊介绍:
International Biomechanics is a fully Open Access biomechanics journal that aims to foster innovation, debate and collaboration across the full spectrum of biomechanics. We publish original articles, reviews, and short communications in all areas of biomechanics and welcome papers that explore: Bio-fluid mechanics, Continuum Biomechanics, Biotribology, Cellular Biomechanics, Mechanobiology, Mechano-transduction, Tissue Mechanics, Comparative Biomechanics and Functional Anatomy, Allometry, Animal locomotion in biomechanics, Gait analysis in biomechanics, Musculoskeletal and Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Cardiovascular Biomechanics, Plant Biomechanics, Injury Biomechanics, Impact Biomechanics, Sport and Exercise Biomechanics, Kinesiology, Rehabilitation in biomechanics, Quantitative Ergonomics, Human Factors engineering, Occupational Biomechanics, Developmental Biomechanics.