Comparative Assessment of The Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometers in Intraocular Pressure Measurements in a Sample of Glaucoma Patients in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana.

Samuel Kyei, Cynthia Pakyennu Gboglu, Michael Agyemang Kwarteng, Frank Assiamah
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of The Goldmann Applanation and Noncontact Tonometers in Intraocular Pressure Measurements in a Sample of Glaucoma Patients in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana.","authors":"Samuel Kyei,&nbsp;Cynthia Pakyennu Gboglu,&nbsp;Michael Agyemang Kwarteng,&nbsp;Frank Assiamah","doi":"10.4103/nmj.NMJ_177_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the study was to explore the usage of the Goldmann applanation tonometry and noncontact tonometry interchangeably in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study involved 441 clinically diagnosed glaucoma patients receiving care at a referral facility. IOP measurements were obtained using both the Noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer The repeatability of the measures was analyzed by comparing the repeated measures of the devices using paired <i>t</i>-test and calculating the correlation coefficient. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the limits of agreement between the two procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 271 (61.5%) males and 170 (38.5%) females and their age ranged from 18 to 73 years (mean age = 49.37; standard deviation ± 14.81 years). The findings of the study showed significantly lower readings (<i>P</i> < 0.001) of the GAT (right eye = 17.40 ± 7.48 mmHg; left eye = 16.80 ± 7.49 mmHg) compared to the NCT (right eye = 20.15 ± 8.30 mmHg; left eye = 19.74 ± 8.31 mmHg). There was a strong positive correlation between the GAT and NCT findings in the right eye (<i>r</i> = 0.871, <i>n</i> = 441, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and in the left eye (<i>r</i> = 0.887, <i>n</i> = 441, <i>P</i> < 0.001). There was a wide limit of agreement between NCT and GAT measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was statistically significant higher measures obtained with NCT than the GAT but did not exceed the allowable inter-device difference. There was a strong positive correlation between GAT and NCT measurements. However, it is strongly recommended that these devices are not used interchangeably in the monitoring of IOP in glaucoma due to the wide range of limits of agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19223,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"323-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c4/ca/NMJ-61-323.PMC8040943.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_177_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study was to explore the usage of the Goldmann applanation tonometry and noncontact tonometry interchangeably in the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients.

Materials and methods: The study involved 441 clinically diagnosed glaucoma patients receiving care at a referral facility. IOP measurements were obtained using both the Noncontact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer The repeatability of the measures was analyzed by comparing the repeated measures of the devices using paired t-test and calculating the correlation coefficient. A Bland-Altman analysis was used to determine the limits of agreement between the two procedures.

Results: There were 271 (61.5%) males and 170 (38.5%) females and their age ranged from 18 to 73 years (mean age = 49.37; standard deviation ± 14.81 years). The findings of the study showed significantly lower readings (P < 0.001) of the GAT (right eye = 17.40 ± 7.48 mmHg; left eye = 16.80 ± 7.49 mmHg) compared to the NCT (right eye = 20.15 ± 8.30 mmHg; left eye = 19.74 ± 8.31 mmHg). There was a strong positive correlation between the GAT and NCT findings in the right eye (r = 0.871, n = 441, P < 0.001) and in the left eye (r = 0.887, n = 441, P < 0.001). There was a wide limit of agreement between NCT and GAT measurements.

Conclusion: There was statistically significant higher measures obtained with NCT than the GAT but did not exceed the allowable inter-device difference. There was a strong positive correlation between GAT and NCT measurements. However, it is strongly recommended that these devices are not used interchangeably in the monitoring of IOP in glaucoma due to the wide range of limits of agreement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Goldmann压平仪和非接触式眼压仪在加纳海岸大都会角青光眼患者眼压测量中的比较评估。
目的:探讨Goldmann眼压计与非接触式眼压计在青光眼患者眼压(IOP)测量中的交替应用。材料和方法:该研究涉及441名在转诊机构接受治疗的临床诊断的青光眼患者。使用非接触式眼压计和Goldmann压平眼压计获得IOP测量值,通过配对t检验比较设备的重复测量值并计算相关系数来分析测量值的重复性。使用Bland-Altman分析来确定两种方法之间的一致限度。结果:男性271例(61.5%),女性170例(38.5%),年龄18 ~ 73岁,平均49.37岁;标准差±14.81年)。研究结果显示GAT读数显著降低(P < 0.001)(右眼= 17.40±7.48 mmHg;左眼= 16.80±7.49 mmHg),右眼= 20.15±8.30 mmHg;左眼= 19.74±8.31 mmHg)。右眼(r = 0.871, n = 441, P < 0.001)和左眼(r = 0.887, n = 441, P < 0.001)的GAT与NCT表现呈正相关。NCT和GAT测量值之间的一致性有很大的限制。结论:NCT获得的测量值显著高于GAT,但不超过允许的设备间差异。GAT和NCT测量值之间有很强的正相关。然而,强烈建议这些设备在监测青光眼的IOP时不要互换使用,因为一致性的限制范围很广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信