Development and implementation of a clinician report to reduce unnecessary urine drug screen testing in the ED: a quality improvement initiative.

Emergency medicine journal : EMJ Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2020-210009
Jason Robert Vanstone, Shivani Patel, Michelle L Degelman, Ibrahim W Abubakari, Shawn McCann, Robert Parker, Terry Ross
{"title":"Development and implementation of a clinician report to reduce unnecessary urine drug screen testing in the ED: a quality improvement initiative.","authors":"Jason Robert Vanstone,&nbsp;Shivani Patel,&nbsp;Michelle L Degelman,&nbsp;Ibrahim W Abubakari,&nbsp;Shawn McCann,&nbsp;Robert Parker,&nbsp;Terry Ross","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2020-210009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unnecessary testing is a problem-facing healthcare systems around the world striving to achieve sustainable care. Despite knowing this problem exists, clinicians continue to order tests that do not contribute to patient care. Using behavioural and implementation science can help address this problem. Locally, audit and feedback are used to provide information to clinicians about their performance on relevant metrics. However, this is often done without evidence-based methods to optimise uptake. Our objective was to improve the appropriate use of laboratory tests in the ED using evidence-based audit and feedback and behaviour change techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the behaviour change wheel, we implemented an audit and feedback tool that provided information to ED physicians about their use of laboratory tests; specifically, we focused on education and review of the appropriate use of urine drug screen tests. The report was designed in collaboration with end users to help maximise engagement. Following development of the report, audit and feedback sessions were delivered over an 18-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data on urine drug screen testing were collected continually throughout the intervention period and showed a sustained decrease among ED physicians. Test use dropped from a monthly departmental average of 26 urine drug screen tests per 1000 patient visits to only eight tests per 1000 patient visits following the initiation of the audit and feedback intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Audit and feedback reduced unnecessary urine drug screen testing in the ED. Regular feedback sessions continuously engaged physicians in the audit and feedback intervention and allowed the implementation team to react to changing priorities and feedback from the clinical group. It was important to include the end users in the design of audit and feedback tools to maximise physician engagement. Inclusion in this process can help ensure physicians adopt a sense of ownership regarding which metrics to review and provides a key component for the motivation aspect of behaviour change. Departmental leadership is also critical to the process of implementing a successful audit and feedback initiative and achieving sustained behaviour change.</p>","PeriodicalId":410922,"journal":{"name":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","volume":" ","pages":"471-478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/emermed-2020-210009","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency medicine journal : EMJ","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Unnecessary testing is a problem-facing healthcare systems around the world striving to achieve sustainable care. Despite knowing this problem exists, clinicians continue to order tests that do not contribute to patient care. Using behavioural and implementation science can help address this problem. Locally, audit and feedback are used to provide information to clinicians about their performance on relevant metrics. However, this is often done without evidence-based methods to optimise uptake. Our objective was to improve the appropriate use of laboratory tests in the ED using evidence-based audit and feedback and behaviour change techniques.

Methods: Using the behaviour change wheel, we implemented an audit and feedback tool that provided information to ED physicians about their use of laboratory tests; specifically, we focused on education and review of the appropriate use of urine drug screen tests. The report was designed in collaboration with end users to help maximise engagement. Following development of the report, audit and feedback sessions were delivered over an 18-month period.

Results: Data on urine drug screen testing were collected continually throughout the intervention period and showed a sustained decrease among ED physicians. Test use dropped from a monthly departmental average of 26 urine drug screen tests per 1000 patient visits to only eight tests per 1000 patient visits following the initiation of the audit and feedback intervention.

Conclusion: Audit and feedback reduced unnecessary urine drug screen testing in the ED. Regular feedback sessions continuously engaged physicians in the audit and feedback intervention and allowed the implementation team to react to changing priorities and feedback from the clinical group. It was important to include the end users in the design of audit and feedback tools to maximise physician engagement. Inclusion in this process can help ensure physicians adopt a sense of ownership regarding which metrics to review and provides a key component for the motivation aspect of behaviour change. Departmental leadership is also critical to the process of implementing a successful audit and feedback initiative and achieving sustained behaviour change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

制定和实施临床医生报告,以减少急诊科不必要的尿液药物筛查:一项提高质量的举措。
背景:不必要的检测是世界各地努力实现可持续护理的卫生保健系统面临的一个问题。尽管知道这个问题的存在,临床医生仍然要求进行对病人护理没有帮助的检查。使用行为科学和实施科学可以帮助解决这个问题。在当地,审计和反馈用于向临床医生提供有关其在相关指标上表现的信息。然而,这通常是在没有基于证据的方法来优化吸收的情况下完成的。我们的目标是利用循证审计和反馈以及行为改变技术,改善在急诊室适当使用实验室测试的情况。方法:使用行为改变轮,我们实施了一个审计和反馈工具,向急诊科医生提供他们使用实验室测试的信息;具体而言,我们侧重于教育和审查适当使用尿液药物筛选试验。该报告是与最终用户合作设计的,以帮助最大限度地提高参与度。在编写报告之后,审计和反馈会议在18个月期间举行。结果:在整个干预期间持续收集尿液药物筛查的数据,并显示急诊科医生的尿药物筛查持续下降。在启动审计和反馈干预措施后,检测使用率从部门每月平均每1000名就诊患者进行26次尿检降至每1000名就诊患者仅进行8次检测。结论:审计和反馈减少了急诊科不必要的尿液药物筛查。定期的反馈会议使医生持续参与审计和反馈干预,并使实施团队能够对临床组不断变化的优先事项和反馈做出反应。重要的是在审计和反馈工具的设计中包括最终用户,以最大限度地提高医生的参与度。纳入这一过程可以帮助确保医生采用一种所有权意识,了解哪些指标需要审查,并为行为改变的动机方面提供关键组成部分。部门领导对于成功实施审计和反馈倡议以及实现持续行为改变的过程也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信