Perspectives of Final Year Students and Newly Qualified Doctors of the Teaching of Preclinical Courses at the College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Beatrice Oluyomi Emma-Okon, Olufemi Kolawole Ogundipe, Josephine Adetinuola Eniola Eziyi
{"title":"Perspectives of Final Year Students and Newly Qualified Doctors of the Teaching of Preclinical Courses at the College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.","authors":"Beatrice Oluyomi Emma-Okon,&nbsp;Olufemi Kolawole Ogundipe,&nbsp;Josephine Adetinuola Eniola Eziyi","doi":"10.4103/nmj.NMJ_33_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is established that there is a strong relationship between perception and outcome of learners' satisfaction, achievement, and success and that a positive learning environment well received by learners is necessary for positive learning outcomes. This study is a first step in providing an answer to the question \"how do learners perceive preclinical medical education in Ife\" with the aim of obtaining information which can serve as basis for the review of teaching methods and improvement of learning environment.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A questionnaire adopted from two validated questionnaires (Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure questionnaire from Dundee and another from a study carried out in Bangladesh) was administered to 187 respondents comprising 106 final year students and 81 newly qualified doctors to obtain the information about their perception of teaching and learning of the three major preclinical participants. Items were rated using the 5-point Likert scale, and each item was scored 4-0. Data were analyzed using the descriptive and inferential statistics. Values were expressed as the mean of scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean gross scores for the 19 items rated for anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology were 28.92, 35.76, and 45.06 (out of 76), respectively. Physiology had the highest score in all the subdomains examined, with 62% of the respondents rating their overall quality of learning experience in the subject \"very good.\" Scores for perception of learning environment were generally low (7.54 ± 0.43, 10.44 ± 0.42, and 12.51 ± 0.47, out of a total of 28 for anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The opinion of learners in this study emphasizes the need for the improvement of teaching methods and learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19223,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"297-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cc/de/NMJ-61-297.PMC8040941.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_33_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is established that there is a strong relationship between perception and outcome of learners' satisfaction, achievement, and success and that a positive learning environment well received by learners is necessary for positive learning outcomes. This study is a first step in providing an answer to the question "how do learners perceive preclinical medical education in Ife" with the aim of obtaining information which can serve as basis for the review of teaching methods and improvement of learning environment.

Methodology: A questionnaire adopted from two validated questionnaires (Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure questionnaire from Dundee and another from a study carried out in Bangladesh) was administered to 187 respondents comprising 106 final year students and 81 newly qualified doctors to obtain the information about their perception of teaching and learning of the three major preclinical participants. Items were rated using the 5-point Likert scale, and each item was scored 4-0. Data were analyzed using the descriptive and inferential statistics. Values were expressed as the mean of scores.

Results: The mean gross scores for the 19 items rated for anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology were 28.92, 35.76, and 45.06 (out of 76), respectively. Physiology had the highest score in all the subdomains examined, with 62% of the respondents rating their overall quality of learning experience in the subject "very good." Scores for perception of learning environment were generally low (7.54 ± 0.43, 10.44 ± 0.42, and 12.51 ± 0.47, out of a total of 28 for anatomy, biochemistry, and physiology, respectively).

Conclusion: The opinion of learners in this study emphasizes the need for the improvement of teaching methods and learning environment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

尼日利亚Ile-Ife奥巴费米·阿沃洛沃大学健康科学学院临床前课程教学的最后一年级学生和新合格医生的观点
背景:学习者的满意度、成就和成功的感知与结果之间存在着密切的关系,学习者所接受的积极的学习环境对于积极的学习结果是必要的。本研究是回答“学习者如何看待生活中的基础医学教育”这一问题的第一步,目的是获取信息,为审查教学方法和改善学习环境提供依据。方法:采用两份有效问卷(Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure来自Dundee的问卷和另一份来自孟加拉国的研究)对187名受访者进行问卷调查,其中包括106名大四学生和81名新合格的医生,以获取他们对三个主要临床前参与者的教学和学习的看法。使用李克特5分量表对项目进行评分,每个项目得分为4-0。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理统计。数值表示为分数的平均值。结果:解剖、生化、生理等19个项目的平均毛分分别为28.92、35.76、45.06分(满分76分)。生理学在所有被检查的子领域中得分最高,62%的受访者认为他们在该学科的整体学习体验质量“非常好”。学习环境感知得分普遍较低(解剖学、生物化学和生理学共28分,分别为7.54±0.43分、10.44±0.42分和12.51±0.47分)。结论:本研究中学习者的意见强调需要改进教学方法和学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信