Sophia Lai, Christine Yu, Cathi E Dennehy, Candy Tsourounis, Kirby P Lee
{"title":"Online Marketing of <i>Ephedra</i> Weight Loss Supplements: Labeling and Marketing Compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Ban on Ephedra.","authors":"Sophia Lai, Christine Yu, Cathi E Dennehy, Candy Tsourounis, Kirby P Lee","doi":"10.1089/acm.2021.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To characterize dietary supplements marketed online as \"ephedra-containing or ephedra-like products\" for weight management and to assess labeling/marketing compliance with the ban on the sale of ephedrine alkaloids. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study assessed websites selling ephedra-like supplements using the search term \"buy ephedra.\" For each website, the first three featured products were characterized by evaluating the label for (1) <i>Ephedra</i> sp. or its alkaloid content, (2) serving size, (3) other ingredients, (4) directions, (5) side effects, (6) reported interactions, (7) recommendation to consult a health care provider, (8) recommendation to use with diet and exercise, and (9) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disclaimer. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-six (71%) of the first 51 websites evaluated sold at least one weight loss product. A total of 105 products were assessed, 93 had labeling with 10 (11%) in possible violation of the ephedra ban. Five were labeled as containing ephedrine or ephedrine hydrochloride, two reported containing ephedrine alkaloids, and two reported containing unidentified <i>Ephedra</i> sp. not formulated as an extract; one reported containing <i>Ma Huang</i>. Sixty-seven (72%) products listed caffeine with a daily serving size averaging 400 mg. Other ingredients with stimulant properties include green tea, yohimbe, and phenylethylamine. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Nearly 20% of websites sold weight loss products that potentially violated the 2004 ban of ephedra alkaloids. Ephedrine, unidentified <i>Ephedra</i> sp. not formulated as an extract, and <i>Ma Huang</i> were labeled as present in 11% of products evaluated. Incomplete reporting of adverse effects and drug interactions was common.</p>","PeriodicalId":14944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","volume":"27 9","pages":"796-802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2021.0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective: To characterize dietary supplements marketed online as "ephedra-containing or ephedra-like products" for weight management and to assess labeling/marketing compliance with the ban on the sale of ephedrine alkaloids. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed websites selling ephedra-like supplements using the search term "buy ephedra." For each website, the first three featured products were characterized by evaluating the label for (1) Ephedra sp. or its alkaloid content, (2) serving size, (3) other ingredients, (4) directions, (5) side effects, (6) reported interactions, (7) recommendation to consult a health care provider, (8) recommendation to use with diet and exercise, and (9) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) disclaimer. Results: Thirty-six (71%) of the first 51 websites evaluated sold at least one weight loss product. A total of 105 products were assessed, 93 had labeling with 10 (11%) in possible violation of the ephedra ban. Five were labeled as containing ephedrine or ephedrine hydrochloride, two reported containing ephedrine alkaloids, and two reported containing unidentified Ephedra sp. not formulated as an extract; one reported containing Ma Huang. Sixty-seven (72%) products listed caffeine with a daily serving size averaging 400 mg. Other ingredients with stimulant properties include green tea, yohimbe, and phenylethylamine. Conclusions: Nearly 20% of websites sold weight loss products that potentially violated the 2004 ban of ephedra alkaloids. Ephedrine, unidentified Ephedra sp. not formulated as an extract, and Ma Huang were labeled as present in 11% of products evaluated. Incomplete reporting of adverse effects and drug interactions was common.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine: Paradigm, Practice, and Policy Advancing Integrative Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal providing scientific research for the evaluation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine into mainstream medical practice. The Journal delivers original research that directly impacts patient care therapies, protocols, and strategies, ultimately improving the quality of healing.
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine coverage includes:
-Botanical Medicine
-Acupuncture and Traditional Chinese Medicine
-Other Traditional Medicine Practices
-Mind-Body Medicine
-Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
-Integrative Health / Medicine
-Yoga
-Ayurveda
-Naturopathy
-Creative Arts Therapies
-Integrative Whole Systems / Whole Practices
-Homeopathy
-Tai Chi
-Qi Gong
-Massage Therapy
-Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine
-Integrative Cost Studies / Comparative Effectiveness
-Neurostimulation
-Integrative Biophysics