Does Rubbing of Universal Adhesive Reduce the 
Negative Effect of Saliva on Adhesion?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cansu Atalay, Ece Meral
{"title":"Does Rubbing of Universal Adhesive Reduce the \u2028Negative Effect of Saliva on Adhesion?","authors":"Cansu Atalay,&nbsp;Ece Meral","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b916859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate in vitro the effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of a universal adhesive applied with actively (with rubbing motion) and passively (without rubbing motion).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 144 bovine dentin samples were used, and the universal adhesive, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, was either applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (passive application) or applied with rubbing motion for 10 s (active application). These 2 groups were divided into 6 subgroups according to saliva contamination (n = 12): 1. control: etch-and-rinse (no saliva); 2. control: self-etch (no saliva); 3. etching/saliva/bonding; 4. etching/bonding/saliva; 5. saliva/bonding; 6. bonding/saliva. A resin composite, Filtek Ultimate, was filled into a polyethylene mold (0.9 mm diameter, 1.2 mm height) on the surfaces. Samples were subjected to microshear bond strength testing, and five specimens from each group were examined using SEM. Resin-dentin interfaces were also observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All failure modes were determined using light microscopy. Statistical analyses were performed with two-way ANOVA, the Kruskall-Wallis test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Active-application groups showed statistically significantly higher bond strengths than did passive groups, regardless of adhesive strategy and saliva contamination (p < 0.05). Application of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in self-etch mode with rubbing motion improved the µSBS among control groups (p < 0.05). The active application did not make a significant difference among the active groups (p > 0.05), except in group 2. Groups 2 and 5 showed significantly higher µSBS than group 3 among the passive groups (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rubbing the universal adhesives without any prior etching may increase the dentin bond strength. Following etching, passive application of the universal adhesive (without any additional rubbing motion) could affect the bonding to dentin in the presence of saliva.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":"23 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b916859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate in vitro the effect of saliva contamination on bond strength of a universal adhesive applied with actively (with rubbing motion) and passively (without rubbing motion).

Materials and methods: A total of 144 bovine dentin samples were used, and the universal adhesive, Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, was either applied in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (passive application) or applied with rubbing motion for 10 s (active application). These 2 groups were divided into 6 subgroups according to saliva contamination (n = 12): 1. control: etch-and-rinse (no saliva); 2. control: self-etch (no saliva); 3. etching/saliva/bonding; 4. etching/bonding/saliva; 5. saliva/bonding; 6. bonding/saliva. A resin composite, Filtek Ultimate, was filled into a polyethylene mold (0.9 mm diameter, 1.2 mm height) on the surfaces. Samples were subjected to microshear bond strength testing, and five specimens from each group were examined using SEM. Resin-dentin interfaces were also observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All failure modes were determined using light microscopy. Statistical analyses were performed with two-way ANOVA, the Kruskall-Wallis test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).

Results: Active-application groups showed statistically significantly higher bond strengths than did passive groups, regardless of adhesive strategy and saliva contamination (p < 0.05). Application of Clearfil Universal Bond Quick in self-etch mode with rubbing motion improved the µSBS among control groups (p < 0.05). The active application did not make a significant difference among the active groups (p > 0.05), except in group 2. Groups 2 and 5 showed significantly higher µSBS than group 3 among the passive groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Rubbing the universal adhesives without any prior etching may increase the dentin bond strength. Following etching, passive application of the universal adhesive (without any additional rubbing motion) could affect the bonding to dentin in the presence of saliva.

擦万能胶能减少
唾液对粘连的负面影响吗?
目的:体外评价唾液污染对主动(有摩擦运动)和被动(无摩擦运动)通用胶粘剂粘接强度的影响。材料和方法:总共使用了144个牛牙本质样品,通用粘合剂Clearfil universal Bond Quick,按照制造商的说明applied(被动应用)或摩擦运动10 s(主动应用)。两组按唾液污染情况分为6个亚组(n = 12):对照:蚀刻冲洗(无唾液);2. 控制:自蚀刻(无唾液);3.蚀刻/唾液/键;4. 蚀刻/焊接/唾液;5. 唾液/键;6. 键/唾液。将Filtek Ultimate树脂复合材料填充到表面的聚乙烯模具(直径0.9 mm,高度1.2 mm)中。对样品进行微剪切粘结强度测试,并对每组5个样品进行扫描电镜检测。透射电镜(TEM)观察树脂-牙本质界面。所有失效模式均采用光学显微镜确定。采用双因素方差分析、Kruskall-Wallis检验和Mann-Whitney u检验进行统计分析(p )。结果:除第2组外,无论粘附策略和唾液污染如何,主动应用组的粘接强度均显著高于被动应用组(p  0.05)。2组和5组的µSBS明显高于3组(p )。结论:磨擦万用粘接剂后,未进行任何蚀刻处理,可提高牙本质黏结强度。蚀刻后,被动应用通用粘合剂(没有任何额外的摩擦运动)可能会影响在唾液存在下与牙本质的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信