Autoradiographic Distribution of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes in Rat Cochlear Nucleus.

Auditory neuroscience Pub Date : 1996-01-01
Weiping Yao, Donald A Godfrey
{"title":"Autoradiographic Distribution of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subtypes in Rat Cochlear Nucleus.","authors":"Weiping Yao,&nbsp;Donald A Godfrey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cochlear nucleus (CN) receives cholinergic inputs primarily from centrifugal pathways. There is evidence that the effects of these cholinergic inputs may be mediated mainly by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. We used 1-[N-methyl-<sup>3</sup>H]scopolamine (NMS) to study muscarinic receptor binding in the rat CN autoradiographically. To determine which muscarinic receptor subtypes participate in the binding, we included competition assays using the unlabeled subtype-preferential ligands pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, 4-DAMP, HHSiD, and tropicamide to compete with [<sup>3</sup>H]NMS for binding. Our results suggest that NMS binding density in the CN is about a tenth of that in the facial nucleus. Inside the CN, the highest binding was found in granular regions, followed in order by the dorsal CN (DCN) fusiform soma layer, the DCN molecular layer, the DCN deep layer, the anteroventral CN (AVCN) and posteroventral CN (PVCN). Binding in the interstitial nucleus (auditory nerve root) was similar to background. The results of the competition assays suggest that the M<sub>2</sub> receptor subtype predominates in VCN, M<sub>4</sub> in the DCN fusiform soma layer, and both subtypes in DCN molecular and deep layers. M<sub>4</sub> and M<sub>3</sub> subtypes predominated in the granular region of AVCN, while M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>2</sub> were more prominent in the granular region of PVCN. The results show similarities to those obtained with pharmacological and immunohistochemical methods, but also some discrepancies. The different distributions of the different muscarinic receptor subtypes suggest that the effects of cholinergic inputs may differ among CN subregions, in agreement with <i>in vivo</i> pharmacological results. Overall, the centrifugal cholinergic influences on information processing in the CN may especially involve M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> receptors.</p>","PeriodicalId":89529,"journal":{"name":"Auditory neuroscience","volume":"2 ","pages":"241-255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840062/pdf/nihms-1660323.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auditory neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cochlear nucleus (CN) receives cholinergic inputs primarily from centrifugal pathways. There is evidence that the effects of these cholinergic inputs may be mediated mainly by muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. We used 1-[N-methyl-3H]scopolamine (NMS) to study muscarinic receptor binding in the rat CN autoradiographically. To determine which muscarinic receptor subtypes participate in the binding, we included competition assays using the unlabeled subtype-preferential ligands pirenzepine, AF-DX 116, 4-DAMP, HHSiD, and tropicamide to compete with [3H]NMS for binding. Our results suggest that NMS binding density in the CN is about a tenth of that in the facial nucleus. Inside the CN, the highest binding was found in granular regions, followed in order by the dorsal CN (DCN) fusiform soma layer, the DCN molecular layer, the DCN deep layer, the anteroventral CN (AVCN) and posteroventral CN (PVCN). Binding in the interstitial nucleus (auditory nerve root) was similar to background. The results of the competition assays suggest that the M2 receptor subtype predominates in VCN, M4 in the DCN fusiform soma layer, and both subtypes in DCN molecular and deep layers. M4 and M3 subtypes predominated in the granular region of AVCN, while M1 and M2 were more prominent in the granular region of PVCN. The results show similarities to those obtained with pharmacological and immunohistochemical methods, but also some discrepancies. The different distributions of the different muscarinic receptor subtypes suggest that the effects of cholinergic inputs may differ among CN subregions, in agreement with in vivo pharmacological results. Overall, the centrifugal cholinergic influences on information processing in the CN may especially involve M2 and M4 receptors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

大鼠耳蜗核毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体亚型放射自显影分布。
耳蜗核(CN)主要从离心途径接受胆碱能输入。有证据表明,这些胆碱能输入的影响可能主要由毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体介导。采用1-[n -甲基- 3h]东莨菪碱(NMS)对毒蕈碱受体在大鼠CN中的结合进行了放射自显影研究。为了确定哪些毒毒碱受体亚型参与了结合,我们使用未标记的亚型优先配体吡仑西平、AF-DX 116、4-DAMP、HHSiD和tropicamide与[3H]NMS竞争结合。我们的结果表明,NMS在CN中的结合密度约为面核的十分之一。在CN内部,颗粒区结合程度最高,其次是背CN (DCN)梭状体层、DCN分子层、DCN深层、前腹面CN (AVCN)和后腹面CN (PVCN)。间质核(听神经根)的结合与背景相似。竞争分析结果表明,M2受体亚型在VCN中占优势,M4受体亚型在DCN梭状体层中占优势,两种亚型均在DCN分子层和深层中占优势。AVCN颗粒区以M4和M3亚型为主,PVCN颗粒区以M1和M2亚型为主。结果与药理学和免疫组化方法相似,但也存在差异。不同毒蕈碱受体亚型的不同分布表明,胆碱能输入的影响可能在CN亚区不同,这与体内药理学结果一致。综上所述,离心胆碱能对CN信息加工的影响可能主要涉及M2和M4受体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信