Is Bony Knee Alignment Representative of the True Joint Surface in Skeletally Immature Patients? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephen D Bigach, Christopher N Carender, Raymond W Liu
{"title":"Is Bony Knee Alignment Representative of the True Joint Surface in Skeletally Immature Patients? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.","authors":"Stephen D Bigach,&nbsp;Christopher N Carender,&nbsp;Raymond W Liu","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>In deformity correction around the knee, the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) are used in surgical planning routinely. While plain radiographs are generally adequate, some surgeons utilise intraoperative arthrograms to visualise the articular contours and assess a younger child's true joint alignment, often with findings that these are discrepant from that measured just using bone alignment. The age cutoff for a discrepancy between the two is not defined.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We queried our picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) database for MRIs with a radiological read of \"normal\" for patients between the ages of 4 and 16 years at the time of the study. Anatomic axes were used to determine the anatomic LDFA (aLDFA) and MPTA angles using end-cartilage and end-bone landmarks independently.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 116 MRIs, 56% male, with approximately 9 studies per year of age. There were no significant overall differences between aLDFA and MPTA when measured at the bone vs cartilage surfaces (<i>p</i> = 0.42 and <i>p</i> = 0.53, respectively). In the 4- to 6-year age range, there was a significant difference between bony and cartilaginous aLDFA (<i>p</i> = 0.02) but not MPTA (<i>p</i> = 0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In children 6 years of age and younger, intraoperative arthrogram should be considered while treating knee deformity, as plain films may not fully represent the true deformity of the distal femur in particular.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Supports the need for advanced imaging or intraoperative arthrogram for joint corrective surgery in young patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3 diagnostic.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Bigach SD, Carender CN, Liu RW. Is Bony Knee Alignment Representative of the True Joint Surface in Skeletally Immature Patients? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):79-83.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"15 2","pages":"79-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b4/93/stlr-15-79.PMC7801901.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim and objective: In deformity correction around the knee, the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) are used in surgical planning routinely. While plain radiographs are generally adequate, some surgeons utilise intraoperative arthrograms to visualise the articular contours and assess a younger child's true joint alignment, often with findings that these are discrepant from that measured just using bone alignment. The age cutoff for a discrepancy between the two is not defined.

Materials and methods: We queried our picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) database for MRIs with a radiological read of "normal" for patients between the ages of 4 and 16 years at the time of the study. Anatomic axes were used to determine the anatomic LDFA (aLDFA) and MPTA angles using end-cartilage and end-bone landmarks independently.

Results: We reviewed 116 MRIs, 56% male, with approximately 9 studies per year of age. There were no significant overall differences between aLDFA and MPTA when measured at the bone vs cartilage surfaces (p = 0.42 and p = 0.53, respectively). In the 4- to 6-year age range, there was a significant difference between bony and cartilaginous aLDFA (p = 0.02) but not MPTA (p = 0.88).

Conclusion: In children 6 years of age and younger, intraoperative arthrogram should be considered while treating knee deformity, as plain films may not fully represent the true deformity of the distal femur in particular.

Clinical significance: Supports the need for advanced imaging or intraoperative arthrogram for joint corrective surgery in young patients.

Level of evidence: Level 3 diagnostic.

How to cite this article: Bigach SD, Carender CN, Liu RW. Is Bony Knee Alignment Representative of the True Joint Surface in Skeletally Immature Patients? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):79-83.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

骨性膝关节排列是否代表骨未成熟患者的真实关节面?磁共振成像研究。
目的和目的:在膝关节周围畸形矫正中,机械股骨外侧远端角(mLDFA)和胫骨内侧近端角(MPTA)通常用于手术计划。虽然x线平片通常是足够的,但一些外科医生利用术中关节摄影来显示关节轮廓并评估年幼儿童的真实关节排列,通常发现这些与仅使用骨排列测量的结果不同。两者之间年龄差异的界限没有定义。材料和方法:我们查询了我们的图像存档和通信系统(PACS)数据库,以获取在研究时年龄在4至16岁之间的患者的mri放射学读数为“正常”。解剖轴分别使用软骨末端和骨末端标记来确定解剖LDFA (aLDFA)和MPTA角度。结果:我们回顾了116例mri, 56%为男性,每年大约有9项研究。在骨和软骨表面测量时,aLDFA和MPTA之间没有显著的总体差异(p分别= 0.42和p = 0.53)。在4 ~ 6岁年龄组中,骨性和软骨性aLDFA差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02),而MPTA差异无统计学意义(p = 0.88)。结论:对于6岁及以下的儿童,在治疗膝关节畸形时应考虑术中关节摄影,因为平片可能不能完全反映股骨远端畸形的真实情况。临床意义:支持对年轻患者进行关节矫正手术进行先进影像学或术中关节造影的需要。证据等级:3级诊断。本文引用方式:Bigach SD、Carender CN、刘荣文。骨性膝关节排列是否代表骨未成熟患者的真实关节面?磁共振成像研究。创伤肢体重建2020;15(2):79-83。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信