A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition - Survival and Quality Outcome.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cornelia Frese, Theresa Wohlrab, Sebastian Soliman, Britta Hahn, Christopher Büsch, Arian Babai, Gabriel Krastl, Diana Wolff
{"title":"A Multicenter Trial on the Long-term Performance of Direct Composite Buildups in the Anterior Dentition - Survival and Quality Outcome.","authors":"Cornelia Frese,&nbsp;Theresa Wohlrab,&nbsp;Sebastian Soliman,&nbsp;Britta Hahn,&nbsp;Christopher Büsch,&nbsp;Arian Babai,&nbsp;Gabriel Krastl,&nbsp;Diana Wolff","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a45514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose: The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the survival and quality outcome of direct composite buildups in the anterior dentition based on representative sample sizes. \nMaterials and Methods: At three university clinics in Germany, the survival and quality outcome of n = 667 direct composite buildups performed between 2001 and 2012 was evaluated in n = 198 participants. Survival outcomes were categorized as failure (F), survival (SR), or successful (S). Restorations still in place and without failure prior to follow-up (n = 567) were rated using modified USPHS/FDI criteria to obtain the quality outcome. Detailed failure analysis was done by means of Cox regression models. \nResults: The restricted mean for overall survival was 15.5 years. N = 576 restorations were classified as successful (S), n = 81 survived with repair (SR) and n = 8 failed (F). Two restorations were removed due to iatrogenic interventions. Overall survival rates after 2, 10, and 15 years were 98.8% (CI: 97.6 and 99.4), 91.7% (CI: 89.0 and 93.8), and 77.6% (CI: 72.2 and 82.2), respectively. Functional survival rates were 100.0%, 98.9% (CI: 97.5 and 99.5), and 98.5% (CI: 96.7 and 99.3), respectively. Clinical quality was rated as excellent or good for most restorations. The dominant failure mode was chipping; however, regression analysis did not detect any influence of the evaluated parameters “enlargement range,” “position in the jaw,” or “tooth type” on failure. \nConclusion: This multicenter study represents the first of its type including clinical survival and quality data on 576 direct anterior composite buildups over a restricted mean follow-up of 15.5 years in a relatively large group of participants. In particular, functional survival was outstanding due to the clinical reliability of this treatment option, while simultaneously providing flexibility, reparability, and minimal invasiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":"22 6","pages":"573-580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a45514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the survival and quality outcome of direct composite buildups in the anterior dentition based on representative sample sizes. Materials and Methods: At three university clinics in Germany, the survival and quality outcome of n = 667 direct composite buildups performed between 2001 and 2012 was evaluated in n = 198 participants. Survival outcomes were categorized as failure (F), survival (SR), or successful (S). Restorations still in place and without failure prior to follow-up (n = 567) were rated using modified USPHS/FDI criteria to obtain the quality outcome. Detailed failure analysis was done by means of Cox regression models. Results: The restricted mean for overall survival was 15.5 years. N = 576 restorations were classified as successful (S), n = 81 survived with repair (SR) and n = 8 failed (F). Two restorations were removed due to iatrogenic interventions. Overall survival rates after 2, 10, and 15 years were 98.8% (CI: 97.6 and 99.4), 91.7% (CI: 89.0 and 93.8), and 77.6% (CI: 72.2 and 82.2), respectively. Functional survival rates were 100.0%, 98.9% (CI: 97.5 and 99.5), and 98.5% (CI: 96.7 and 99.3), respectively. Clinical quality was rated as excellent or good for most restorations. The dominant failure mode was chipping; however, regression analysis did not detect any influence of the evaluated parameters “enlargement range,” “position in the jaw,” or “tooth type” on failure. Conclusion: This multicenter study represents the first of its type including clinical survival and quality data on 576 direct anterior composite buildups over a restricted mean follow-up of 15.5 years in a relatively large group of participants. In particular, functional survival was outstanding due to the clinical reliability of this treatment option, while simultaneously providing flexibility, reparability, and minimal invasiveness.

一项关于前牙列直接复合堆积长期表现的多中心试验-生存和质量结果。
目的:本多中心研究的目的是基于代表性样本量评估前牙列直接复合堆积的生存和质量结果。材料和方法:在德国的三所大学诊所,对2001年至2012年间进行的n = 667次直接复合建立的n = 198名参与者的生存和质量结果进行了评估。生存结局分为失败(F)、生存(SR)或成功(S)。在随访前(n = 567),使用修改后的USPHS/FDI标准对仍在原位且无失败的修复体进行评分,以获得质量结局。采用Cox回归模型进行了详细的失效分析。结果:总生存期的限制平均为15.5年。N = 576个修复体被分类为成功(S), N = 81个修复体存活(SR), N = 8个修复体失败(F)。2个修复体因医源性干预而被移除。2年、10年和15年后的总生存率分别为98.8% (CI: 97.6和99.4)、91.7% (CI: 89.0和93.8)和77.6% (CI: 72.2和82.2)。功能生存率分别为100.0%、98.9% (CI: 97.5和99.5)和98.5% (CI: 96.7和99.3)。大多数修复体的临床质量被评为优秀或良好。主要失效模式为剥落;然而,回归分析没有发现评估参数“扩大范围”、“在颌中的位置”或“牙齿类型”对失效的任何影响。结论:该多中心研究首次纳入了576例直接前路复合病变的临床生存和质量数据,在相对较大的参与者群体中进行了15.5年的有限平均随访。特别是,由于这种治疗方案的临床可靠性,同时提供灵活性,可修复性和最小的侵入性,功能存活率突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信