Is There Any Effect of Subjective Tinnitus on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Q3 Medicine
Gokhan Toptas, Kemal Keseroğlu, Bülent Öcal, Cem Saka, Serap Er, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
{"title":"Is There Any Effect of Subjective Tinnitus on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.","authors":"Gokhan Toptas,&nbsp;Kemal Keseroğlu,&nbsp;Bülent Öcal,&nbsp;Cem Saka,&nbsp;Serap Er,&nbsp;Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz","doi":"10.5935/0946-5448.20200012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idiopathic subjective tinnitus has a complex pathophysiology in which not only cochlear and central classical auditory pathways but also nonclassical auditory pathways of different parts of the brain are involved. Vestibuloocular and vestibulocollic pathways are the central projections of utricle and saccule used in the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test. Aim of this study was to investigate the effects of idiopathic subjective tinnitus on vestibuloocular and vestibulocollic pathways via VEMP. We prospectively analyzed 30 unilateral idiopathic subjective tinnitus patient's cervical, ocular VEMP tests, tinnitus handicap index scores, symptom duration and compared with contralateral ear and 35 healthy volunteers. The latencies and amplitudes of P1 and N1 waves were recorded and pathologic wave criteria was calculated according to healthy volunteer's data. In cervical VEMP there were significant longer latencies of P1 and N1 waves with respect to contralateral ear and control group. In ocular VEMP test, N1 and P1 latencies and amplitudes were not significantly different. The percentages of pathologic wave of the tinnitus side were not significantly higher in both cervical VEMP and ocular VEMP tests with respect to contralateral side. Tinnitus handicap index scores and symptom duration had no relationship with latency and amplitude of VEMP tests. Although cervical VEMP P1 and N1 latencies were significantly longer, subjective tinnitus did not result in pathological alterations in the VEMP test. Presence of subjective tinnitus is not an influencing factor in the VEMP interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39842,"journal":{"name":"International Tinnitus Journal","volume":"24 2","pages":"54-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Tinnitus Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0946-5448.20200012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Idiopathic subjective tinnitus has a complex pathophysiology in which not only cochlear and central classical auditory pathways but also nonclassical auditory pathways of different parts of the brain are involved. Vestibuloocular and vestibulocollic pathways are the central projections of utricle and saccule used in the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test. Aim of this study was to investigate the effects of idiopathic subjective tinnitus on vestibuloocular and vestibulocollic pathways via VEMP. We prospectively analyzed 30 unilateral idiopathic subjective tinnitus patient's cervical, ocular VEMP tests, tinnitus handicap index scores, symptom duration and compared with contralateral ear and 35 healthy volunteers. The latencies and amplitudes of P1 and N1 waves were recorded and pathologic wave criteria was calculated according to healthy volunteer's data. In cervical VEMP there were significant longer latencies of P1 and N1 waves with respect to contralateral ear and control group. In ocular VEMP test, N1 and P1 latencies and amplitudes were not significantly different. The percentages of pathologic wave of the tinnitus side were not significantly higher in both cervical VEMP and ocular VEMP tests with respect to contralateral side. Tinnitus handicap index scores and symptom duration had no relationship with latency and amplitude of VEMP tests. Although cervical VEMP P1 and N1 latencies were significantly longer, subjective tinnitus did not result in pathological alterations in the VEMP test. Presence of subjective tinnitus is not an influencing factor in the VEMP interpretation.

主观性耳鸣对前庭诱发肌原电位是否有影响?
特发性主观性耳鸣的病理生理过程复杂,不仅涉及耳蜗和中枢经典听觉通路,还涉及大脑不同部位的非经典听觉通路。前庭室和前庭结肠通路是前庭诱发肌电位(VEMP)试验中使用的小囊和小囊的中心投射。本研究旨在探讨特发性主观性耳鸣通过VEMP对前庭和前庭-结肠通路的影响。我们前瞻性地分析了30例单侧特发性主观耳鸣患者的颈部、眼部VEMP检查、耳鸣障碍指数评分、症状持续时间,并与对侧耳和35名健康志愿者进行了比较。记录P1波和N1波的潜伏期和振幅,并根据健康志愿者的数据计算病理波标准。在颈VEMP中,P1和N1波潜伏期明显长于对侧耳和对照组。眼部VEMP试验中N1、P1潜伏期和波幅无显著性差异。颈部VEMP和眼部VEMP检查中耳鸣侧病理波的百分比均不明显高于对侧。耳鸣障碍指数评分和症状持续时间与VEMP试验的潜伏期和振幅无关。虽然颈部VEMP P1和N1潜伏期明显延长,但主观性耳鸣未导致VEMP试验的病理改变。主观耳鸣的存在不是VEMP解释的影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Tinnitus Journal
International Tinnitus Journal Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The International Tinnitus Journal is the first peer review journal to provide a forum for exchange of information of on-going basic and clinical science efforts for understanding tinnitus and its application to patient diagnosis and treatment. Subject areas to be covered range from fundamental theory to clinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书