Hand Bacterial Repopulation Dynamics Following Two Methods of Surgical Hand Preparation during Elective Orthopedic Surgeries.

Thompson Ehis Akpokonyan, Oluwadare Esan, Innocent Chiedu Ikem, Kwashie Ajibade Ako-Nai, Blessing Itohan Omo-Omorodion
{"title":"Hand Bacterial Repopulation Dynamics Following Two Methods of Surgical Hand Preparation during Elective Orthopedic Surgeries.","authors":"Thompson Ehis Akpokonyan,&nbsp;Oluwadare Esan,&nbsp;Innocent Chiedu Ikem,&nbsp;Kwashie Ajibade Ako-Nai,&nbsp;Blessing Itohan Omo-Omorodion","doi":"10.4103/nmj.NMJ_185_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Antiseptic hand preparations are routine prior to surgical procedures to reduce microbial load on the operating gloved hands. Two methods of surgical hand preparations available are the antibacterial detergent hand wash and an alcohol-based hand rub.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to compare quantitatively, the efficacy of the two methods in hand bacterial reductions during elective orthopedic surgeries.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This comparative study was conducted at the orthopedic surgery department of a tertiary health facility.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>One-hundred and sixty dominant hands of operating surgeons and nurses involved in forty elective orthopedic surgeries were studied. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the antibacterial detergent hand-washing (HW) or the alcohol-based hand-rubbing (HR) groups. Swab samples were obtained from the hands before and after hand preparations and at the end of surgeries following removal of the operating gloves. These samples were then subjected to culture. The bacterial counts on these were then obtained through an automated colony counter, and the results were expressed in logarithmic values (log<sub>10</sub>).</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The analysis was done using IBM SPSS software version 20. The mean results obtained were subjected to an independent <i>t</i>-test analysis with the statistical significance level set at <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods of hand antisepsis showed comparable efficacies in attaining surgical hand hygiene at 1-min postapplication (<i>P</i> = 0.73). HR group, however, showed greater sustained effects during the period of surgeries, though not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.18).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Scrubbing using the HR method is a viable alternative to the HW method during elective orthopedic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19223,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"241-244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/5b/NMJ-61-241.PMC7808281.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Medical Journal : Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nmj.NMJ_185_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context: Antiseptic hand preparations are routine prior to surgical procedures to reduce microbial load on the operating gloved hands. Two methods of surgical hand preparations available are the antibacterial detergent hand wash and an alcohol-based hand rub.

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare quantitatively, the efficacy of the two methods in hand bacterial reductions during elective orthopedic surgeries.

Setting and design: This comparative study was conducted at the orthopedic surgery department of a tertiary health facility.

Subjects and methods: One-hundred and sixty dominant hands of operating surgeons and nurses involved in forty elective orthopedic surgeries were studied. The subjects were randomly assigned to either the antibacterial detergent hand-washing (HW) or the alcohol-based hand-rubbing (HR) groups. Swab samples were obtained from the hands before and after hand preparations and at the end of surgeries following removal of the operating gloves. These samples were then subjected to culture. The bacterial counts on these were then obtained through an automated colony counter, and the results were expressed in logarithmic values (log10).

Statistical analysis used: The analysis was done using IBM SPSS software version 20. The mean results obtained were subjected to an independent t-test analysis with the statistical significance level set at P < 0.05.

Results: Both methods of hand antisepsis showed comparable efficacies in attaining surgical hand hygiene at 1-min postapplication (P = 0.73). HR group, however, showed greater sustained effects during the period of surgeries, though not statistically significant (P = 0.18).

Conclusion: Scrubbing using the HR method is a viable alternative to the HW method during elective orthopedic surgery.

择期骨科手术中两种手部准备方法对手部细菌繁殖的影响。
背景:手术前常规的手部消毒准备,以减少戴着手套操作的手上的微生物负荷。两种可用的外科手部准备方法是抗菌洗涤剂洗手和含酒精的洗手液。目的:本研究的目的是定量比较两种方法在择期骨科手术中手部细菌减少的效果。环境和设计:本比较研究在一家三级医疗机构的骨科进行。对象与方法:对40例骨科择期手术的160名外科医生和护士的优势手进行研究。受试者被随机分配到抗菌洗涤剂洗手组(HW)和酒精洗手组(HR)。在手部准备之前和之后以及在手术结束后摘下手术手套时从手部获取拭子样本。然后将这些样品进行培养。然后通过自动菌落计数器获得这些细菌计数,结果以对数值(log10)表示。采用的统计分析:采用IBM SPSS软件20版进行分析。所得均数采用独立t检验分析,P < 0.05为统计学显著性水平。结果:两种手部消毒方法在应用后1 min达到手术手卫生效果相当(P = 0.73)。而HR组在手术期间的持续效果更强,但无统计学意义(P = 0.18)。结论:在择期骨科手术中,HR法是替代HW法的可行方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信