{"title":"The Vatican Opinion on Gender Theory.","authors":"Julio Tudela, Enrique Burguete, Justo Aznar","doi":"10.1177/0024363920933111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article is a reasoned response to the article by Timothy F. Murphy, recently published in the prestigious journal <i>Bioethics</i>, on the supposed opposition between the views of the Catholic Church and what he calls \"contemporary science\" in relation to certain anthropological issues linked to the gender perspective. To point to \"the Vatican\" as anchored in an unscientific and anachronistic position, using the term contemporary science to which he attributes a unanimous representation of current scientific thinking on the subject is, in our view, unfounded and completely unacceptable. In his reflection, he does not adequately distinguish between intersex and transgenderism, two clearly different realities with different needs. The author defends the obsolescence of the binary sex/gender model that, in his view, \"betrays human sexuality.\" Furthermore, he does so without providing a plausible justification or a definition of human nature that is able to support the plurality and indeterminacy of sexual conditions, without falling back on untenable dualisms or relativism devoid of scientific objectivity. In our response, we highlight how the dialogue between Faith and Reason, as developed in the recent Magisterium of the Catholic Church, is essential to explain nature, the human being and, in general, all creations. Finally, contemporary science does not provide a monolithic and unquestionable view of the nature of human beings and their sexual identity, as the author claims, with many scientists confirming evidence of a binary human sexuality genetically and phenotypically determined.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>This paper is a reasoned response to the supposed opposition between the views of the Catholic Church and \"contemporary science\" in relation to certain anthropological issues linked to the gender perspective.The dialogue between Faith and Reason, as developed in the recent Magisterium of the Catholic Church, is essential to explain nature, the human being and, in general, all creation, against the opinion of those who defend the obsolescence of the binary sex/gender model that, in their view, \"betrays human sexuality\".</p>","PeriodicalId":505854,"journal":{"name":"The Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0024363920933111","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0024363920933111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This article is a reasoned response to the article by Timothy F. Murphy, recently published in the prestigious journal Bioethics, on the supposed opposition between the views of the Catholic Church and what he calls "contemporary science" in relation to certain anthropological issues linked to the gender perspective. To point to "the Vatican" as anchored in an unscientific and anachronistic position, using the term contemporary science to which he attributes a unanimous representation of current scientific thinking on the subject is, in our view, unfounded and completely unacceptable. In his reflection, he does not adequately distinguish between intersex and transgenderism, two clearly different realities with different needs. The author defends the obsolescence of the binary sex/gender model that, in his view, "betrays human sexuality." Furthermore, he does so without providing a plausible justification or a definition of human nature that is able to support the plurality and indeterminacy of sexual conditions, without falling back on untenable dualisms or relativism devoid of scientific objectivity. In our response, we highlight how the dialogue between Faith and Reason, as developed in the recent Magisterium of the Catholic Church, is essential to explain nature, the human being and, in general, all creations. Finally, contemporary science does not provide a monolithic and unquestionable view of the nature of human beings and their sexual identity, as the author claims, with many scientists confirming evidence of a binary human sexuality genetically and phenotypically determined.
Summary: This paper is a reasoned response to the supposed opposition between the views of the Catholic Church and "contemporary science" in relation to certain anthropological issues linked to the gender perspective.The dialogue between Faith and Reason, as developed in the recent Magisterium of the Catholic Church, is essential to explain nature, the human being and, in general, all creation, against the opinion of those who defend the obsolescence of the binary sex/gender model that, in their view, "betrays human sexuality".
这篇文章是对Timothy F. Murphy最近发表在著名杂志《生物伦理学》上的一篇文章的合理回应,这篇文章讨论了天主教会的观点与他所谓的“当代科学”在某些与性别观点有关的人类学问题上的对立。在我们看来,将“梵蒂冈”定位于一个不科学和不合时宜的位置,使用“当代科学”一词,他认为这是对当前科学思想的一致代表,这是毫无根据和完全不可接受的。在他的反思中,他没有充分区分双性人和跨性别者,这是两种截然不同的现实,有着不同的需求。作者为二元性/性别模式的过时辩护,在他看来,二元性/性别模式“背叛了人类的性行为”。此外,他这样做没有提供一个合理的理由或人性的定义,能够支持性条件的多元性和不确定性,而不是依靠站不住脚的二元论或缺乏科学客观性的相对主义。在我们的回应中,我们强调了信仰与理性之间的对话,正如最近天主教会的训导所发展的那样,对于解释自然、人类以及总体上所有的创造物是至关重要的。最后,当代科学并没有像作者所说的那样,对人类的本质及其性别认同提供一个统一的、不容置疑的观点,许多科学家证实了人类性别在基因和表型上是二元的证据。摘要:本文是对天主教会与“当代科学”在某些与性别观点相关的人类学问题上的观点之间的所谓对立的理性回应。信仰与理性之间的对话,正如最近天主教会的训导所发展的那样,对于解释自然,人类,总的来说,所有的创造都是必不可少的,反对那些捍卫二元性/性别模式过时的人的观点,在他们看来,二元性/性别模式“背叛了人类的性”。