Ethical Aspects of Genotype Disclosure: Perceptions of Participants in a Nutrigenetic Study in Finland.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Public Health Genomics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-22 DOI:10.1159/000512640
Suchetana De, Maaria Tringham, Anu Hopia, Raija Tahvonen, Anna-Maija Pietilä, Kirsi Vähäkangas
{"title":"Ethical Aspects of Genotype Disclosure: Perceptions of Participants in a Nutrigenetic Study in Finland.","authors":"Suchetana De,&nbsp;Maaria Tringham,&nbsp;Anu Hopia,&nbsp;Raija Tahvonen,&nbsp;Anna-Maija Pietilä,&nbsp;Kirsi Vähäkangas","doi":"10.1159/000512640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to gain insight into the understanding of genetics and perceptions on the ethical issues related to genotype disclosure of the participants in a nutrigenetic study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A close-ended questionnaire was developed based on literature and discussions among the research group members. The questionnaire contained a -total of 33 questions, which were divided into 4 categories - demographics, knowledge assessment, concerns related to participation, and opinions on disclosure of information. Majority of the participants (250 out of 281) of a nutrigenetic study, in which effect of disclosing APOE allele status on lifestyle changes was studied, completed the questionnaire online following the informed consent process. The responses from the knowledge assessment and the concern categories were transformed into knowledge and concern scales, respectively, and analysed by descriptive statistical methods. The statistical associations between the categorical variables were determined using χ2 test of independence. The relationship between the continuous variables was assessed using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and internal consistency of questions by Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No correlation was observed between the level of education and knowledge scores. About 10% of the participants thought that the genetic predisposition would be stressful to them and their family members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful distribution of information before a nutrigenetic study supports understanding and reduces concerns of genetic susceptibility. In Finland, strong basic education is likely to have strengthened the trust in research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000512640","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000512640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to gain insight into the understanding of genetics and perceptions on the ethical issues related to genotype disclosure of the participants in a nutrigenetic study.

Methods: A close-ended questionnaire was developed based on literature and discussions among the research group members. The questionnaire contained a -total of 33 questions, which were divided into 4 categories - demographics, knowledge assessment, concerns related to participation, and opinions on disclosure of information. Majority of the participants (250 out of 281) of a nutrigenetic study, in which effect of disclosing APOE allele status on lifestyle changes was studied, completed the questionnaire online following the informed consent process. The responses from the knowledge assessment and the concern categories were transformed into knowledge and concern scales, respectively, and analysed by descriptive statistical methods. The statistical associations between the categorical variables were determined using χ2 test of independence. The relationship between the continuous variables was assessed using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and internal consistency of questions by Cronbach's alpha.

Results: No correlation was observed between the level of education and knowledge scores. About 10% of the participants thought that the genetic predisposition would be stressful to them and their family members.

Conclusions: Careful distribution of information before a nutrigenetic study supports understanding and reduces concerns of genetic susceptibility. In Finland, strong basic education is likely to have strengthened the trust in research process.

基因型披露的伦理方面:芬兰营养遗传学研究参与者的看法。
目的:本研究的目的是深入了解遗传学的理解和对营养遗传学研究中参与者基因型披露相关伦理问题的看法。方法:在文献资料和研究组成员讨论的基础上,编制封闭式问卷。问卷共包含33个问题,分为4类:人口统计、知识评估、与参与有关的问题和对信息披露的意见。在一项营养遗传学研究中,研究了APOE等位基因状态对生活方式改变的影响,其中大多数参与者(281人中的250人)根据知情同意程序完成了在线问卷调查。将知识评估和关注类别的回答分别转化为知识和关注量表,并采用描述性统计方法进行分析。分类变量间的统计学相关性采用χ2独立性检验。使用Pearson积矩相关系数评估连续变量之间的关系,使用Cronbach's alpha评估问题的内部一致性。结果:受教育程度与知识得分无相关性。大约10%的参与者认为这种遗传倾向会给他们和他们的家庭成员带来压力。结论:在营养遗传学研究之前仔细分发信息有助于理解并减少对遗传易感性的担忧。在芬兰,强大的基础教育可能加强了对研究过程的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信