Ali Lakhani, Sanjoti Parekh, David P Watling, Peter Grimbeek, Ross Duncan, Susan Charlifue, Elizabeth Kendall
{"title":"Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage.","authors":"Ali Lakhani, Sanjoti Parekh, David P Watling, Peter Grimbeek, Ross Duncan, Susan Charlifue, Elizabeth Kendall","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the association between self-reported accessibility and engagement with health services and places in the community, and quality of life (QOL) for people with spinal cord damage (SCD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two-hundred and sixty-six people with a SCD residing in Australia (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 62.34, <i>SD<sub>age</sub></i> = 15.95).</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>The International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Univariate regressions demonstrated that accessing a higher number of places in the community was significantly associated with favorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = .160, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = .144, P < .01), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = .206, P < .01), and QOL (<i>β</i> = .187, P < .01). In contrast, reporting a higher number of inaccessible places was significantly associated with unfavorable self-reported psychological health (<i>β</i> = -.171, P < .01), physical health (<i>β</i> = -.270, P < .001), overall well-being (<i>β</i> = -.238, P < .001), and QOL (<i>β</i> = -.244, P < .001). Being older and living with injury or onset of damage longer were significantly associated with favorable scores across all outcomes (P < .01) except physical health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Community engagement can have a considerable impact on the self-reported health and QOL of people with SCD. Interventions aimed at increasing community engagement, particularly for people who have recently experienced SCD are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":501560,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"522-530"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2020.1860867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to investigate the association between self-reported accessibility and engagement with health services and places in the community, and quality of life (QOL) for people with spinal cord damage (SCD).
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Community.
Participants: Two-hundred and sixty-six people with a SCD residing in Australia (Mage = 62.34, SDage = 15.95).
Outcome measure: The International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set.
Results: Univariate regressions demonstrated that accessing a higher number of places in the community was significantly associated with favorable self-reported psychological health (β = .160, P < .01), physical health (β = .144, P < .01), overall well-being (β = .206, P < .01), and QOL (β = .187, P < .01). In contrast, reporting a higher number of inaccessible places was significantly associated with unfavorable self-reported psychological health (β = -.171, P < .01), physical health (β = -.270, P < .001), overall well-being (β = -.238, P < .001), and QOL (β = -.244, P < .001). Being older and living with injury or onset of damage longer were significantly associated with favorable scores across all outcomes (P < .01) except physical health.
Conclusions: Community engagement can have a considerable impact on the self-reported health and QOL of people with SCD. Interventions aimed at increasing community engagement, particularly for people who have recently experienced SCD are warranted.