Multifaceted strategies to improve blood pressure control in a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project

Q4 Medicine
Cirous Sadeghi, Hassan A. Khan, Gregory Gudleski, Jessica L. Reynolds, Smita Y. Bakhai
{"title":"Multifaceted strategies to improve blood pressure control in a primary care clinic: A quality improvement project","authors":"Cirous Sadeghi,&nbsp;Hassan A. Khan,&nbsp;Gregory Gudleski,&nbsp;Jessica L. Reynolds,&nbsp;Smita Y. Bakhai","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Approximately 80% of patients with hypertension in the Internal Medicine Clinic were uncontrolled (BP &gt; 130/80 mmHg), according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) was to improve BP control &lt;130/80 from the baseline rates of 20%–30% and &lt;140/90 from the baseline rates of 40%–60% between ages of 18–75 years, within 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. A multidisciplinary QI team identified barriers by fish bone diagram. Barriers included: 1) Physicians' knowledge gap and clinical inertia in optimization of medications, and 2) Patients' nonadherence to medication and appointments. The outcome measures were the percentage of patients with BP &lt; 140/90 and &lt; 130/80. Process measures included: 1) attendance rates of physician and nurses at educational sessions, 2) medication reconciliation completion rates and 3) care guide order rates. Key interventions were: 1) physicians and nurses' education regarding ACC/AHA guidelines, 2) patient education and engagement and 3) enhancement of health information technology. Data analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved 62.6% (n = 885/1426) for BP &lt; 140/90 and 24.47% (n = 349/1426) for BP &lt; 130/80 within 12 months project period. We sustained and exceeded at 72.64% (n = 945/1301) for BP &lt; 140/90 and 44.58% (n = 580/1301) for BP &lt; 130/80 during the 10 months post-project period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overcoming physician clinical inertia, enhancing patient adherence to appointments and medications, and a high functioning multidisciplinary team were the key drivers for the success.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100060"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100060","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086220300379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background

Approximately 80% of patients with hypertension in the Internal Medicine Clinic were uncontrolled (BP > 130/80 mmHg), according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) hypertension guidelines, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) was to improve BP control <130/80 from the baseline rates of 20%–30% and <140/90 from the baseline rates of 40%–60% between ages of 18–75 years, within 12 months.

Methods

We used the Plan-Do-Study-Act method. A multidisciplinary QI team identified barriers by fish bone diagram. Barriers included: 1) Physicians' knowledge gap and clinical inertia in optimization of medications, and 2) Patients' nonadherence to medication and appointments. The outcome measures were the percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 and < 130/80. Process measures included: 1) attendance rates of physician and nurses at educational sessions, 2) medication reconciliation completion rates and 3) care guide order rates. Key interventions were: 1) physicians and nurses' education regarding ACC/AHA guidelines, 2) patient education and engagement and 3) enhancement of health information technology. Data analysis was performed using monthly statistical process control charts.

Results

We achieved 62.6% (n = 885/1426) for BP < 140/90 and 24.47% (n = 349/1426) for BP < 130/80 within 12 months project period. We sustained and exceeded at 72.64% (n = 945/1301) for BP < 140/90 and 44.58% (n = 580/1301) for BP < 130/80 during the 10 months post-project period.

Conclusions

Overcoming physician clinical inertia, enhancing patient adherence to appointments and medications, and a high functioning multidisciplinary team were the key drivers for the success.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改善初级保健诊所血压控制的多方面策略:一个质量改进项目
背景:内科门诊约80%的高血压患者未得到控制(BP >根据2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)高血压指南,130/80 mmHg),导致发病率和死亡率增加。该质量改善(QI)的目的是在12个月内将18-75岁患者的血压控制从基线率(20%-30%)提高至130/80,从基线率(40%-60%)提高至140/90。方法采用计划-行动-研究-行动法。多学科QI团队通过鱼骨图识别障碍。障碍包括:1)医生在药物优化方面的知识差距和临床惯性;2)患者不遵医嘱和预约。结果测量指标为BP <患者的百分比;140/90和<130/80。过程测量包括:1)医生和护士在教育会议上的出勤率,2)药物和解完成率和3)护理指导订单率。主要干预措施是:1)医生和护士关于ACC/AHA指南的教育,2)患者教育和参与,3)加强卫生信息技术。数据分析采用月度统计过程控制图。结果BP <的检出率为62.6% (n = 885/1426);BP和lt分别为140/90和24.47% (n = 349/1426);在12个月内完成130/80的项目。我们维持并超过了72.64% (n = 945/1301)的BP <BP和lt分别为140/90和44.58% (n = 580/1301);在项目后10个月期间达到130/80。结论克服医生的临床惰性,提高患者对预约和用药的依从性,以及一支高效的多学科团队是成功的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信