The effect of feedback on cardiovascular risk factors on optimization of primary prevention: The PharmLines initiative

Q4 Medicine
M. Yldau van der Ende , Ingmar E. Waardenburg , E. Lipsic , Jens H.J. Bos , Eelko Hak , H. Snieder , Pim van der Harst
{"title":"The effect of feedback on cardiovascular risk factors on optimization of primary prevention: The PharmLines initiative","authors":"M. Yldau van der Ende ,&nbsp;Ingmar E. Waardenburg ,&nbsp;E. Lipsic ,&nbsp;Jens H.J. Bos ,&nbsp;Eelko Hak ,&nbsp;H. Snieder ,&nbsp;Pim van der Harst","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is unknown whether population based single assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and feedback to individuals and general practitioners results in initiation of preventive cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in those at risk.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The population based cohort study Lifelines was linked to the IADB.nl pharmacy database to assess information on the initiation of preventive medication (<em>N</em> = 48,770). At the baseline visit, information on cardiovascular risk factors was collected and reported to the participants and their general practitioners. An interrupted-time-series-analysis was plotted, in which the start year of blood pressure and lipid lowering medication was displayed in years before or after the baseline visit. Subsequently, predictors of the initiation of pharmacotherapy were determined and possible reduction in cardiovascular events that could be achieved by optimal treatment of individuals at risk.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Before the Lifelines baseline visit, 34% (out of 1,527, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 32%–36%) and 30% (out of 1,991, 95%CI 28%–32%) of the individuals at risk had a blood pressure or lipid lowering drug prescription, respectively. In those at risk, the use of blood pressure lowering medication, increased substantially during the year of the baseline visit. Treating individuals at increased risk (≥5% 10-year risk) with lipid or blood pressure lowering medication (<em>N</em> = 8515 and <em>N</em> = 6899) would have prevented 162 and 183 CVD events, respectively, in the upcoming five years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Primary prevention of CVD in the general population appears suboptimal. Feedback of cardiovascular risk factors resulted in a substantial increase of blood pressure lowering medication and extrapolated health benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36839,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100042","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590086220300197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

It is unknown whether population based single assessment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and feedback to individuals and general practitioners results in initiation of preventive cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in those at risk.

Methods

The population based cohort study Lifelines was linked to the IADB.nl pharmacy database to assess information on the initiation of preventive medication (N = 48,770). At the baseline visit, information on cardiovascular risk factors was collected and reported to the participants and their general practitioners. An interrupted-time-series-analysis was plotted, in which the start year of blood pressure and lipid lowering medication was displayed in years before or after the baseline visit. Subsequently, predictors of the initiation of pharmacotherapy were determined and possible reduction in cardiovascular events that could be achieved by optimal treatment of individuals at risk.

Results

Before the Lifelines baseline visit, 34% (out of 1,527, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 32%–36%) and 30% (out of 1,991, 95%CI 28%–32%) of the individuals at risk had a blood pressure or lipid lowering drug prescription, respectively. In those at risk, the use of blood pressure lowering medication, increased substantially during the year of the baseline visit. Treating individuals at increased risk (≥5% 10-year risk) with lipid or blood pressure lowering medication (N = 8515 and N = 6899) would have prevented 162 and 183 CVD events, respectively, in the upcoming five years.

Conclusion

Primary prevention of CVD in the general population appears suboptimal. Feedback of cardiovascular risk factors resulted in a substantial increase of blood pressure lowering medication and extrapolated health benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心血管危险因素反馈对一级预防优化的影响:PharmLines倡议
背景目前尚不清楚基于人群的心血管疾病(CVD)风险评估和对个人和全科医生的反馈是否会导致高危人群开始预防性心血管药物治疗。方法基于人群的队列研究“生命线”与IADB相关联。nl药房数据库评估开始预防性用药的信息(N = 48,770)。在基线访问时,收集心血管危险因素的信息并向参与者及其全科医生报告。绘制了一个中断的时间序列分析,其中血压和降脂药物的开始年份显示在基线访问之前或之后的年份。随后,确定了药物治疗开始的预测因素,并通过对高危个体的最佳治疗来实现心血管事件的可能减少。结果在生命线基线访问之前,34%(1,527人,95%置信区间(CI) 32%-36%)和30%(1,991人,95%CI 28%-32%)的高危个体分别有降压药或降脂药处方。在那些有风险的人群中,使用降血压药物的人数在基线访问期间大幅增加。使用降脂或降血压药物(N = 8515和N = 6899)治疗风险增加的个体(10年风险≥5%)将在未来5年内分别预防162和183例CVD事件。结论普通人群对心血管疾病的一级预防并不理想。心血管危险因素的反馈导致降压药的大量增加和推断的健康益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension
International Journal of Cardiology: Hypertension Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信