Random Forest-Based Prediction of Outcome and Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Primary Decompressive Craniectomy.

World Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-12 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.002
Martin Hanko, Marián Grendár, Pavol Snopko, René Opšenák, Juraj Šutovský, Martin Benčo, Jakub Soršák, Kamil Zeleňák, Branislav Kolarovszki
{"title":"Random Forest-Based Prediction of Outcome and Mortality in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Undergoing Primary Decompressive Craniectomy.","authors":"Martin Hanko,&nbsp;Marián Grendár,&nbsp;Pavol Snopko,&nbsp;René Opšenák,&nbsp;Juraj Šutovský,&nbsp;Martin Benčo,&nbsp;Jakub Soršák,&nbsp;Kamil Zeleňák,&nbsp;Branislav Kolarovszki","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various prognostic models are used to predict mortality and functional outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury with a trend to incorporate machine learning protocols. None of these models is focused exactly on the subgroup of patients indicated for decompressive craniectomy. Evidence regarding efficiency of this surgery is still incomplete, especially in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy with evacuation of traumatic mass lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective study with a 6-month follow-up period, we assessed postoperative outcome and mortality of 40 patients who underwent primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injuries during 2018-2019. The results were analyzed in relation to a wide spectrum of preoperatively available demographic, clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data. Random forest algorithms were trained for prediction of both mortality and unfavorable outcome, with their accuracy quantified by area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) for out-of-bag samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the end of the follow-up period, we observed mortality of 57.5%. Favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score 4-5) was achieved by 30% of our patients. Random forest-based prediction models constructed for 6-month mortality and outcome reached a moderate predictive ability, with AUC = 0.811 and AUC = 0.873, respectively. Random forest models trained on handpicked variables showed slightly decreased AUC = 0.787 for 6-month mortality and AUC = 0.846 for 6-month outcome and increased out-of-bag error rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Random forest algorithms show promising results in prediction of postoperative outcome and mortality in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy. The best performance was achieved by Classification Random forest for 6-month outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":508491,"journal":{"name":"World Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"e450-e458"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.002","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Background: Various prognostic models are used to predict mortality and functional outcome in patients after traumatic brain injury with a trend to incorporate machine learning protocols. None of these models is focused exactly on the subgroup of patients indicated for decompressive craniectomy. Evidence regarding efficiency of this surgery is still incomplete, especially in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy with evacuation of traumatic mass lesions.

Methods: In a prospective study with a 6-month follow-up period, we assessed postoperative outcome and mortality of 40 patients who underwent primary decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injuries during 2018-2019. The results were analyzed in relation to a wide spectrum of preoperatively available demographic, clinical, radiographic, and laboratory data. Random forest algorithms were trained for prediction of both mortality and unfavorable outcome, with their accuracy quantified by area under the receiver operating curves (AUCs) for out-of-bag samples.

Results: At the end of the follow-up period, we observed mortality of 57.5%. Favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale [GOS] score 4-5) was achieved by 30% of our patients. Random forest-based prediction models constructed for 6-month mortality and outcome reached a moderate predictive ability, with AUC = 0.811 and AUC = 0.873, respectively. Random forest models trained on handpicked variables showed slightly decreased AUC = 0.787 for 6-month mortality and AUC = 0.846 for 6-month outcome and increased out-of-bag error rates.

Conclusions: Random forest algorithms show promising results in prediction of postoperative outcome and mortality in patients undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy. The best performance was achieved by Classification Random forest for 6-month outcome.

基于随机森林的创伤性脑损伤患者行颅底减压切除术的预后和死亡率预测。
背景:各种预后模型被用于预测创伤性脑损伤后患者的死亡率和功能结局,并有纳入机器学习协议的趋势。这些模型都没有准确地集中在指征减压颅骨切除术的患者亚组上。关于这种手术的有效性的证据仍然不完整,特别是在接受初级减压颅骨切除术并清除创伤性肿块病变的患者中。方法:在一项为期6个月随访期的前瞻性研究中,我们评估了2018-2019年40例创伤性脑损伤行颅脑减压手术的患者的术后预后和死亡率。结果与术前可获得的广泛的人口统计学、临床、放射学和实验室数据进行了分析。随机森林算法被训练用于预测死亡率和不良结果,其准确性通过袋外样本的接受者工作曲线下面积(auc)来量化。结果:随访结束时,死亡率为57.5%。30%的患者获得了良好的预后(格拉斯哥预后量表[GOS]评分4-5分)。基于随机森林的6个月死亡率和预后预测模型达到中等预测能力,AUC分别为0.811和0.873。在精挑细选的变量上训练的随机森林模型显示,6个月死亡率的AUC = 0.787, 6个月预后的AUC = 0.846略有下降,袋子外错误率增加。结论:随机森林算法在预测初次颅脑减压切除术患者的术后预后和死亡率方面显示出良好的结果。分类随机森林在6个月的预后中表现最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信