Effectiveness of Alcohol-free Mouth Rinse Containing Essential Oils and Fluoride as an Oral Hygiene Adjunct among Pregnant Thai Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jaranya Hunsrisakhun, Supitcha Talungchit, Supawadee Naorungroj
{"title":"Effectiveness of Alcohol-free Mouth Rinse Containing Essential Oils and Fluoride as an Oral Hygiene Adjunct among Pregnant Thai Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Jaranya Hunsrisakhun,&nbsp;Supitcha Talungchit,&nbsp;Supawadee Naorungroj","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_289_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This 3-month, double-blind, two-center, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial compared the improvement of oral hygiene status from alcohol-free essential oils (EO) with 0.05% fluoride mouthwash to the control (0.05% fluoride mouthwash).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and fifty-four pregnant women were clinically examined to determine Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Plaque Index (PI), and Winkel Tongue Coating Index (WTCI) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months by calibrated examiners. After supragingival scaling and provision of a tooth brushing method, participants were randomly assigned to daily use of alcohol-free EO or the control rinse for 30s at bedtime. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to assess the effectiveness of alcohol-free EO with 0.05% fluoride mouthwash on MGI, PI, and WTCI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty subjects completed the study. The dropout rate of 9.1% (<i>n</i> = 14) was mainly due to loss of follow-up. At baseline, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and the control groups for MGI (1.19±0.57 <i>vs.</i> 1.11±0.48, <i>P</i> = 0.371), PI (1.53±0.56 <i>vs.</i> 1.47±0.48, <i>P</i> = 0.439), and WTCI (0.88±0.48 <i>vs.</i> 0.88±0.50, <i>P</i> = 0.990). There was a statistically significant reduction of MGI, PI, and WTCI scores over time (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed for between-group comparisons for all measured indices at any time point. No adverse effect was reported in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the end of 3-month period, improvement of oral hygiene of pregnancy women in this study was evidence. However, the use of alcohol-free EO mouthwash as supplements to the daily oral hygiene did not provide a significant improvement in terms of plaque, gingival, and tongue coating indices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"803-812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/b2/JISPCD-10-803.PMC7791593.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_289_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: This 3-month, double-blind, two-center, parallel, randomized controlled clinical trial compared the improvement of oral hygiene status from alcohol-free essential oils (EO) with 0.05% fluoride mouthwash to the control (0.05% fluoride mouthwash).

Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty-four pregnant women were clinically examined to determine Modified Gingival Index (MGI), Plaque Index (PI), and Winkel Tongue Coating Index (WTCI) at baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months by calibrated examiners. After supragingival scaling and provision of a tooth brushing method, participants were randomly assigned to daily use of alcohol-free EO or the control rinse for 30s at bedtime. Repeated measures of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to assess the effectiveness of alcohol-free EO with 0.05% fluoride mouthwash on MGI, PI, and WTCI scores.

Results: One hundred and forty subjects completed the study. The dropout rate of 9.1% (n = 14) was mainly due to loss of follow-up. At baseline, no significant differences were observed between the intervention and the control groups for MGI (1.19±0.57 vs. 1.11±0.48, P = 0.371), PI (1.53±0.56 vs. 1.47±0.48, P = 0.439), and WTCI (0.88±0.48 vs. 0.88±0.50, P = 0.990). There was a statistically significant reduction of MGI, PI, and WTCI scores over time (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed for between-group comparisons for all measured indices at any time point. No adverse effect was reported in either group.

Conclusion: At the end of 3-month period, improvement of oral hygiene of pregnancy women in this study was evidence. However, the use of alcohol-free EO mouthwash as supplements to the daily oral hygiene did not provide a significant improvement in terms of plaque, gingival, and tongue coating indices.

Abstract Image

含精油和氟化物的无酒精漱口水作为泰国孕妇口腔卫生辅助的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
目的:本研究是一项为期3个月的双盲、双中心、平行、随机对照临床试验,比较0.05%氟化物漱口水和0.05%氟化物漱口水对口腔卫生状况的改善。材料和方法:对154名孕妇进行临床检查,在基线、2周和3个月时通过校准的检查者测定改良牙龈指数(MGI)、菌斑指数(PI)和Winkel舌苔指数(WTCI)。在牙龈上清洁和提供刷牙方法后,参与者被随机分配每天在睡前使用不含酒精的EO或对照漱口水30秒。采用重复方差分析(ANOVA)来评估含0.05%氟化物漱口水的无酒精EO对MGI、PI和WTCI评分的有效性。结果:140名受试者完成了研究。退出率为9.1% (n = 14),主要原因是缺少随访。基线时,干预组与对照组MGI(1.19±0.57比1.11±0.48,P = 0.371)、PI(1.53±0.56比1.47±0.48,P = 0.439)、WTCI(0.88±0.48比0.88±0.50,P = 0.990)差异无统计学意义。随着时间的推移,MGI、PI和WTCI评分有统计学意义的降低(P < 0.001)。然而,在任何时间点,各组间比较的所有测量指标均无显著差异。两组均无不良反应报告。结论:在妊娠3个月结束时,本研究显示孕妇口腔卫生有明显改善。然而,使用不含酒精的EO漱口水作为日常口腔卫生的补充,在菌斑、牙龈和舌苔指数方面没有显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信