Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases.

Q2 Dentistry
Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-21 DOI:10.1159/000510189
Anton Sculean, Herbert Deppe, Richard Miron, Frank Schwarz, Georgios Romanos, Raluca Cosgarea
{"title":"Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases.","authors":"Anton Sculean,&nbsp;Herbert Deppe,&nbsp;Richard Miron,&nbsp;Frank Schwarz,&nbsp;Georgios Romanos,&nbsp;Raluca Cosgarea","doi":"10.1159/000510189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the last decade, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been extensively investigated for the treatment of periodontal and peri-implant infections. Nonetheless, contradicting clinical and microbiological outcomes and only results on a short-term basis have been reported so far, thus making it difficult to conclude on clinically relevant recommendations for the use of PDT. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the potential clinical and/or microbiological benefit for the use of PDT in non-surgical periodontal and peri-implant therapy, and to draw clinically relevant conclusions on the use of PDT in periodontal practice. Based on the available evidence from RCTs and recent meta-analyses, we can conclude the following: in patients with mild to moderate periodontitis, the combination of scaling and root planing (SRP) and PDT may result in significantly higher clinical improvements (bleeding on probing and probing depth reduction, clinical attachment gain) compared to SRP alone in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis; in patients with stage III and IV grade C periodontitis (previously known as AgP) the use of PDT provides clinical improvements, although PDT cannot so far be recommended as a replacement for systemic antibiotics (i.e., amoxicillin and metronidazole); PDT may be indicated as a valuable tool for treating moderate residual periodontal pockets during maintenance therapy; limited evidence on the use of PDT in medically compromised patients (i.e., diabetes mellitus, oral lichen planus) indicates that PDT may represent a possible alternative to other more invasive medication/treatment procedures; limited evidence suggests that PDT may represent a valuable tool in attaining inflammation reduction on a short-term basis in peri-implant diseases (i.e., peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis).</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

During the last decade, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been extensively investigated for the treatment of periodontal and peri-implant infections. Nonetheless, contradicting clinical and microbiological outcomes and only results on a short-term basis have been reported so far, thus making it difficult to conclude on clinically relevant recommendations for the use of PDT. Therefore, the aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the potential clinical and/or microbiological benefit for the use of PDT in non-surgical periodontal and peri-implant therapy, and to draw clinically relevant conclusions on the use of PDT in periodontal practice. Based on the available evidence from RCTs and recent meta-analyses, we can conclude the following: in patients with mild to moderate periodontitis, the combination of scaling and root planing (SRP) and PDT may result in significantly higher clinical improvements (bleeding on probing and probing depth reduction, clinical attachment gain) compared to SRP alone in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis; in patients with stage III and IV grade C periodontitis (previously known as AgP) the use of PDT provides clinical improvements, although PDT cannot so far be recommended as a replacement for systemic antibiotics (i.e., amoxicillin and metronidazole); PDT may be indicated as a valuable tool for treating moderate residual periodontal pockets during maintenance therapy; limited evidence on the use of PDT in medically compromised patients (i.e., diabetes mellitus, oral lichen planus) indicates that PDT may represent a possible alternative to other more invasive medication/treatment procedures; limited evidence suggests that PDT may represent a valuable tool in attaining inflammation reduction on a short-term basis in peri-implant diseases (i.e., peri-implantitis, peri-implant mucositis).

光动力疗法治疗牙周和种植周疾病的效果。
在过去的十年中,光动力疗法(PDT)已被广泛研究用于治疗牙周和种植体周围感染。尽管如此,迄今为止报道的临床和微生物结果相互矛盾,而且只是短期的结果,因此很难得出PDT使用的临床相关建议。因此,这篇叙述性综述的目的是提供随机对照临床试验(RCTs)的现有证据,评估PDT在非手术牙周和种植周治疗中使用的潜在临床和/或微生物益处,并得出PDT在牙周实践中使用的临床相关结论。根据随机对照试验和近期荟萃分析的现有证据,我们可以得出以下结论:在轻中度牙周炎患者中,与单独使用SRP相比,在牙周炎的非手术治疗中,刮治和牙根刨平(SRP)和PDT联合使用可显著提高临床改善(探诊出血和探诊深度减少,临床附着增加);在III期和IV期C级牙周炎(以前称为AgP)患者中,使用PDT可以改善临床效果,尽管PDT目前还不能被推荐作为全身抗生素(即阿莫西林和甲硝唑)的替代品;PDT可能是在维持治疗期间治疗中度残余牙周袋的有价值的工具;关于PDT在医学上有缺陷的患者(即糖尿病、口腔扁平苔藓)中使用的有限证据表明,PDT可能是其他更具侵入性的药物/治疗程序的可能替代方案;有限的证据表明,PDT可能是在短期内实现种植体周围疾病(即种植体周围炎、种植体周围粘膜炎)炎症减轻的有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信