(Re)construction identitaire et pratique infirmière en psychiatrie légale : réflexion critique sur les commissions d’examen.

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine
Jean-Laurent Domingue, Jean Daniel Jacob, Amélie Perron, Pierre Pariseau-Legault, Thomas Foth
{"title":"(Re)construction identitaire et pratique infirmière en psychiatrie légale : réflexion critique sur les commissions d’examen.","authors":"Jean-Laurent Domingue,&nbsp;Jean Daniel Jacob,&nbsp;Amélie Perron,&nbsp;Pierre Pariseau-Legault,&nbsp;Thomas Foth","doi":"10.3917/rsi.143.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction&#160;: The caritative impact of nursing care provided in forensic mental health settings is rarely questioned.Context&#160;: Caritative nursing care is indirectly regulated by the Review Board (RB), a para-judicial court which ensures public safety.Objective&#160;: This study presents a critical reflection on the political and social effects of the RB, forensic psychiatry hospitals and practices of forensic mental health nurses.Method&#160;: The reflection is centered on the concepts of biopower, degradation ceremonies, moral career and identity (re)construction.Results&#160;: &#8216;Therapeutic&#8217; nursing practices are useful for disciplinary purposes in the forensic psychiatric hospital, insofar as they permit the identification and management of dangerous persons. However, the practices also fall within the biopolitical scope of the RB, since they assist the latter in ensuring public safety.Discussion&#160;: The forensic psychiatric environment can prove problematic for nurses, requiring a double allegiance, whereby their responsibilities to patients (consent and confidentiality) and to the institution (protection of the public) can lead to tension.Conclusion&#160;: The analytical framework of the study allows for a reassessment of other presumed processes in psychiatric environments, which nonetheless constitute just as many rituals of identity (re)construction.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.143.0118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction : The caritative impact of nursing care provided in forensic mental health settings is rarely questioned.Context : Caritative nursing care is indirectly regulated by the Review Board (RB), a para-judicial court which ensures public safety.Objective : This study presents a critical reflection on the political and social effects of the RB, forensic psychiatry hospitals and practices of forensic mental health nurses.Method : The reflection is centered on the concepts of biopower, degradation ceremonies, moral career and identity (re)construction.Results : ‘Therapeutic’ nursing practices are useful for disciplinary purposes in the forensic psychiatric hospital, insofar as they permit the identification and management of dangerous persons. However, the practices also fall within the biopolitical scope of the RB, since they assist the latter in ensuring public safety.Discussion : The forensic psychiatric environment can prove problematic for nurses, requiring a double allegiance, whereby their responsibilities to patients (consent and confidentiality) and to the institution (protection of the public) can lead to tension.Conclusion : The analytical framework of the study allows for a reassessment of other presumed processes in psychiatric environments, which nonetheless constitute just as many rituals of identity (re)construction.

(再)身份建构与法医学精神病学护理实践:对审查委员会的批判性反思。
引言 :在法医精神卫生机构中提供护理的影响很少受到质疑。背景 :护理是由审查委员会(RB)间接监管的,RB是一个确保公共安全的准司法法院。目的 :本研究对审查委员会、法医精神病院和法医精神卫生护士的做法的政治和社会影响进行了批判性反思。方法 :反思的核心是生命权力、退化仪式、道德生涯和身份(再)建构的概念。在法医精神病院,只要护理做法允许识别和管理危险人员,它们对纪律目的是有用的。然而,这些做法也属于RB的生物政治范围,因为它们帮助后者确保公共安全。讨论 :法医精神病学环境对护士来说可能是有问题的,需要双重忠诚,因此她们对病人(同意和保密)和对机构(保护公众)的责任可能导致紧张关系。该研究的分析框架允许对精神病学环境中其他假定的过程进行重新评估,尽管如此,这些过程仍然构成了许多身份(重新)建构的仪式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信