Decision-Making Capacity in Healthcare: Instruments Review and Reflections About its Assessment in the Elderly with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.

The Psychiatric quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7
Ana Saraiva Amaral, Rosa Marina Afonso, Mário R Simões, Sandra Freitas
{"title":"Decision-Making Capacity in Healthcare: Instruments Review and Reflections About its Assessment in the Elderly with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia.","authors":"Ana Saraiva Amaral,&nbsp;Rosa Marina Afonso,&nbsp;Mário R Simões,&nbsp;Sandra Freitas","doi":"10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases has been significantly increasing in the last decades, and it is expected to continue to grow. These health disorders can impair patients' decision-making capacity in healthcare. The capacity to make healthcare decisions is a fundamental pillar of informed consent, therefore, it should be carefully assessed. Clinicians' assessment, when not supported by a standardized tool, has revealed to be unreliable, so the recourse to an instrument of capacity assessment is crucial. The present paper aims to identify and summarize published instruments of healthcare decision-making capacity. To do so, a search of peer-reviewed articles in English, Portuguese and Spanish was conducted. A total of eighteen articles, detailing seventeen assessment instruments were selected. Instruments differ on format, structure, assessed abilities and psychometric properties. Likewise, instruments' targeted population also varies, with a few being specifically developed for patients with dementia. Although a high number of instruments were found, there is still no gold standard for healthcare decision-making capacity assessment. The lack of a gold standard highlights the need for more research in this field, as well as an effort to develop guidelines and normative data, in order to improve clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":520814,"journal":{"name":"The Psychiatric quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"35-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Psychiatric quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09867-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases has been significantly increasing in the last decades, and it is expected to continue to grow. These health disorders can impair patients' decision-making capacity in healthcare. The capacity to make healthcare decisions is a fundamental pillar of informed consent, therefore, it should be carefully assessed. Clinicians' assessment, when not supported by a standardized tool, has revealed to be unreliable, so the recourse to an instrument of capacity assessment is crucial. The present paper aims to identify and summarize published instruments of healthcare decision-making capacity. To do so, a search of peer-reviewed articles in English, Portuguese and Spanish was conducted. A total of eighteen articles, detailing seventeen assessment instruments were selected. Instruments differ on format, structure, assessed abilities and psychometric properties. Likewise, instruments' targeted population also varies, with a few being specifically developed for patients with dementia. Although a high number of instruments were found, there is still no gold standard for healthcare decision-making capacity assessment. The lack of a gold standard highlights the need for more research in this field, as well as an effort to develop guidelines and normative data, in order to improve clinical practices.

医疗保健决策能力:老年认知障碍和痴呆患者决策能力评估的工具回顾与思考
在过去的几十年里,神经退行性疾病的患病率显著增加,预计还会继续增长。这些健康障碍会损害患者在医疗保健中的决策能力。作出保健决定的能力是知情同意的基本支柱,因此,应仔细评估。临床医生的评估在没有标准化工具的支持下是不可靠的,因此求助于能力评估工具是至关重要的。本论文旨在识别和总结医疗保健决策能力发表的工具。为此,对英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语的同行评议文章进行了搜索。共选择了18篇文章,详细介绍了17种评估工具。测试工具在格式、结构、评估能力和心理测量特性上有所不同。同样,仪器的目标人群也各不相同,有一些是专门为痴呆症患者开发的。虽然发现了大量的工具,但仍然没有医疗保健决策能力评估的黄金标准。由于缺乏黄金标准,因此需要在这一领域进行更多的研究,并努力制定指导方针和规范数据,以改进临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信