Human Locomotion Classification for Different Terrains Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Q3 Engineering
Sachin Negi, Pranshu C B S Negi, Shiru Sharma, Neeraj Sharma
{"title":"Human Locomotion Classification for Different Terrains Using Machine Learning Techniques.","authors":"Sachin Negi,&nbsp;Pranshu C B S Negi,&nbsp;Shiru Sharma,&nbsp;Neeraj Sharma","doi":"10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gait analysis on healthy subjects was performed based on surface electromyographic and acceleration sensor signal, implemented through machine learning approaches. The surface EMG and 3-axes acceleration signals have been acquired for 5 different terrains: level ground, ramp ascent, ramp descent, stair ascent, and stair descent. These signals were acquired from the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medial head muscles that correspond to dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, respectively. After feature extraction, these signals are fed to 5 conventional classifiers: linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest, and support vector machine, that classify different terrains for human locomotion. We compared the classification results for the above classifiers with deep neural network classifier. The objective was to obtain the features and classifiers that are able to discriminate between 5 locomotion terrains with maximum classification accuracy in minimum time by acquiring the signal from the least number of leg muscles. The results indicated that the support vector machine gives the highest classification accuracy of 99.20 (± 0.80)% for the dataset acquired from 15 healthy subjects. In terms of both accuracy and computation time, the support vector machine outperforms other classifiers.</p>","PeriodicalId":53679,"journal":{"name":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","volume":"48 4","pages":"199-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2020035013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Gait analysis on healthy subjects was performed based on surface electromyographic and acceleration sensor signal, implemented through machine learning approaches. The surface EMG and 3-axes acceleration signals have been acquired for 5 different terrains: level ground, ramp ascent, ramp descent, stair ascent, and stair descent. These signals were acquired from the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius medial head muscles that correspond to dorsiflexion and plantar flexion, respectively. After feature extraction, these signals are fed to 5 conventional classifiers: linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest, and support vector machine, that classify different terrains for human locomotion. We compared the classification results for the above classifiers with deep neural network classifier. The objective was to obtain the features and classifiers that are able to discriminate between 5 locomotion terrains with maximum classification accuracy in minimum time by acquiring the signal from the least number of leg muscles. The results indicated that the support vector machine gives the highest classification accuracy of 99.20 (± 0.80)% for the dataset acquired from 15 healthy subjects. In terms of both accuracy and computation time, the support vector machine outperforms other classifiers.

基于机器学习技术的不同地形人体运动分类。
基于表面肌电图和加速度传感器信号,通过机器学习方法实现对健康受试者的步态分析。获得了5种不同地形的表面肌电信号和3轴加速度信号:平地、坡道上升、坡道下降、楼梯上升和楼梯下降。这些信号来自胫骨前肌和腓肠肌内侧头肌,分别对应于背屈和足底屈。特征提取后,将这些信号馈送到5种常规分类器:线性判别分析、k近邻、决策树、随机森林和支持向量机,对人类运动的不同地形进行分类。我们将上述分类器的分类结果与深度神经网络分类器进行了比较。目标是通过从最少数量的腿部肌肉中获取信号,获得能够在最短时间内以最大分类精度区分5种运动地形的特征和分类器。结果表明,对于15名健康受试者的数据集,支持向量机的分类准确率最高,为99.20(±0.80)%。在准确率和计算时间方面,支持向量机优于其他分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering
Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Biomedical engineering has been characterized as the application of concepts drawn from engineering, computing, communications, mathematics, and the physical sciences to scientific and applied problems in the field of medicine and biology. Concepts and methodologies in biomedical engineering extend throughout the medical and biological sciences. This journal attempts to critically review a wide range of research and applied activities in the field. More often than not, topics chosen for inclusion are concerned with research and practice issues of current interest. Experts writing each review bring together current knowledge and historical information that has led to the current state-of-the-art.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信