Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition

Q1 Immunology and Microbiology
Bhawna Yadav , Héctor M. Mora-Montes , Jeanette Wagener , Iain Cunningham , Lara West , Ken Haynes , Alistair J.P. Brown , Neil A.R. Gow
{"title":"Differences in fungal immune recognition by monocytes and macrophages: N-mannan can be a shield or activator of immune recognition","authors":"Bhawna Yadav ,&nbsp;Héctor M. Mora-Montes ,&nbsp;Jeanette Wagener ,&nbsp;Iain Cunningham ,&nbsp;Lara West ,&nbsp;Ken Haynes ,&nbsp;Alistair J.P. Brown ,&nbsp;Neil A.R. Gow","doi":"10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We designed experiments to assess whether fungal cell wall mannans function as an immune shield or an immune agonist. Fungal cell wall β-(1,3)-glucan normally plays a major and dominant role in immune activation. The outer mannan layer has been variously described as an immune shield, because it has the potential to mask the underlying β-(1,3)-glucan, or an immune activator, as it also has the potential to engage with a wide range of mannose detecting PRRs. To resolve this conundrum we examined species-specific differences in host immune recognition in the <em>och</em>1Δ <em>N-</em>mannosylation-deficient mutant background in four species of yeast-like fungi. Irrespective of the fungal species, the cytokine response (TNFα and IL-6) induced by the <em>och</em>1Δ mutants in human monocytes was reduced compared to that of the wild type. In contrast, TNFα production induced by <em>och</em>1Δ was increased, relative to wild type, due to increased β-glucan exposure, when mouse or human macrophages were used. These observations suggest that <em>N</em>-mannan is not a major PAMP for macrophages and that in these cells mannan does shield the fungus from recognition of the inner cell wall β-glucan. However, <em>N</em>-mannan is a significant inducer of cytokine for monocytes. Therefore the metaphor of the fungal “mannan shield” can only be applied to some, but not all, myeloid cells used in immune profiling experiments of fungal species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36539,"journal":{"name":"Cell Surface","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100042"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tcsw.2020.100042","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Surface","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468233020300098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

We designed experiments to assess whether fungal cell wall mannans function as an immune shield or an immune agonist. Fungal cell wall β-(1,3)-glucan normally plays a major and dominant role in immune activation. The outer mannan layer has been variously described as an immune shield, because it has the potential to mask the underlying β-(1,3)-glucan, or an immune activator, as it also has the potential to engage with a wide range of mannose detecting PRRs. To resolve this conundrum we examined species-specific differences in host immune recognition in the ochN-mannosylation-deficient mutant background in four species of yeast-like fungi. Irrespective of the fungal species, the cytokine response (TNFα and IL-6) induced by the och1Δ mutants in human monocytes was reduced compared to that of the wild type. In contrast, TNFα production induced by och1Δ was increased, relative to wild type, due to increased β-glucan exposure, when mouse or human macrophages were used. These observations suggest that N-mannan is not a major PAMP for macrophages and that in these cells mannan does shield the fungus from recognition of the inner cell wall β-glucan. However, N-mannan is a significant inducer of cytokine for monocytes. Therefore the metaphor of the fungal “mannan shield” can only be applied to some, but not all, myeloid cells used in immune profiling experiments of fungal species.

Abstract Image

单核细胞和巨噬细胞对真菌免疫识别的差异:n -甘露聚糖可以是免疫识别的屏蔽物或激活物
我们设计了实验来评估真菌细胞壁甘露聚糖是作为免疫屏障还是免疫激动剂起作用。真菌细胞壁β-(1,3)-葡聚糖通常在免疫激活中起主要和主导作用。外甘露聚糖层被不同地描述为一种免疫屏障,因为它有可能掩盖潜在的β-(1,3)-葡聚糖或免疫激活剂,因为它也有可能与广泛的甘露聚糖检测PRRs。为了解决这个难题,我们研究了四种酵母样真菌在och1Δ n-甘露糖基化缺陷突变背景下宿主免疫识别的物种特异性差异。与野生型相比,och1Δ突变体在人单核细胞中诱导的细胞因子反应(TNFα和IL-6)降低,而不考虑真菌种类。相比之下,当使用小鼠或人巨噬细胞时,由于β-葡聚糖暴露增加,och1Δ诱导的TNFα产生相对于野生型增加。这些观察结果表明,n -甘露聚糖不是巨噬细胞的主要PAMP,在这些细胞中,甘露聚糖确实保护真菌不识别内细胞壁β-葡聚糖。然而,n -甘露聚糖是单核细胞的重要细胞因子诱导剂。因此,真菌“甘露聚糖屏蔽”的比喻只能适用于一些,而不是全部,用于真菌物种免疫谱分析实验的骨髓细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Surface
Cell Surface Immunology and Microbiology-Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信