{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Diode Laser and Clinpro XT Varnish for Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Bhavika Alpesh Bhavsar, Michelle Vaz, Kamei Neilalung, Tanisha Das, Swarnaditya Majumdar, Jagriti Talukdar","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_356_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a very common dilemma and often results in temporary relief by the conventional treatment method. An <i>in vivo</i> comparative study of various methods and materials helps in evaluation of a superior method to provide a long-lasting relief.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of diode laser (DL) and Clinpro XT Varnish for managing DH.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial, designed, adhering to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Guidelines using DL and fluoride-based varnish for managing DH. A total of 40 teeth were selected from eight patients and randomly divided into two groups. All patients received tactile and air syringe stimulus to assess for DH and a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to obtain readings at baseline, 15min, 1 week, and 3 weeks, posttreatment. Student's <i>t</i> test was used, paired <i>t</i> test was for the intragroups, and unpaired <i>t</i> test was for intergroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study showed that the effect of DL and Clinpro XT Varnish results in a significant decrease of DH. However, success decreased gradually over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinpro XT Varnish presented superior immediate effect and DL effect tends to become better with time. Hence, both had good results in the end.</p>","PeriodicalId":520674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"779-785"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0d/81/JISPCD-10-779.PMC7791592.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_356_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Context: Dentin hypersensitivity (DH) is a very common dilemma and often results in temporary relief by the conventional treatment method. An in vivo comparative study of various methods and materials helps in evaluation of a superior method to provide a long-lasting relief.
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of diode laser (DL) and Clinpro XT Varnish for managing DH.
Materials and methods: This study was a randomized, single-blinded, clinical trial, designed, adhering to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Guidelines using DL and fluoride-based varnish for managing DH. A total of 40 teeth were selected from eight patients and randomly divided into two groups. All patients received tactile and air syringe stimulus to assess for DH and a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to obtain readings at baseline, 15min, 1 week, and 3 weeks, posttreatment. Student's t test was used, paired t test was for the intragroups, and unpaired t test was for intergroups.
Results: This study showed that the effect of DL and Clinpro XT Varnish results in a significant decrease of DH. However, success decreased gradually over time.
Conclusion: Clinpro XT Varnish presented superior immediate effect and DL effect tends to become better with time. Hence, both had good results in the end.