New or Worsened Mitral Regurgitation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Nicolas Kumar, Julia E Kumar, Nasir Hussain, Leonid Gorelik, Michael K Essandoh, Bryan A Whitson, Amar M Bhatt, Antolin S Flores, Ali Hachem, Tamara R Sawyer, Manoj H Iyer
{"title":"New or Worsened Mitral Regurgitation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nicolas Kumar,&nbsp;Julia E Kumar,&nbsp;Nasir Hussain,&nbsp;Leonid Gorelik,&nbsp;Michael K Essandoh,&nbsp;Bryan A Whitson,&nbsp;Amar M Bhatt,&nbsp;Antolin S Flores,&nbsp;Ali Hachem,&nbsp;Tamara R Sawyer,&nbsp;Manoj H Iyer","doi":"10.1177/1089253220982202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New or worsened mitral regurgitation (MR) is an uncommon yet serious complication after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While there have been numerous reports of its occurrence, there is little consensus regarding its presentation and management. This systematic review summarizes the evidence in the current literature surrounding new or worsened MR after SAVR and analyzes its potential implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases were examined for all articles and abstracts reporting on new or worsened MR after SAVR. Data collected included number of patients studied; patient characteristics; incidences of new or worsened MR; timing of diagnosis; and treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six full-text citations were included in this review. The prevalence of new or worsened MR after SAVR was 8.4%. Sixteen percent of new MR occurrences were from an organic etiology, and 83% of new MR occurrences were that of a functional etiology. Most diagnoses were made in the late or unspecified postoperative period using echocardiography (range: 0 minutes to 18 years postoperatively). While no patients died from this complication, 7.7% of patients (16 out of 207) required emergent procedural re-intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying new or worsened MR following SAVR and accurate scoring of MR severity to guide treatment. It also outlines the associated clinical measures commonly documented following this complication, and the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of significant MR. These results reflect the current, limited state of the literature on this topic and warrant further investigation into MR detection and management strategies in SAVR patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46500,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","volume":"25 3","pages":"173-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1089253220982202","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1089253220982202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: New or worsened mitral regurgitation (MR) is an uncommon yet serious complication after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). While there have been numerous reports of its occurrence, there is little consensus regarding its presentation and management. This systematic review summarizes the evidence in the current literature surrounding new or worsened MR after SAVR and analyzes its potential implications.

Methods: Databases were examined for all articles and abstracts reporting on new or worsened MR after SAVR. Data collected included number of patients studied; patient characteristics; incidences of new or worsened MR; timing of diagnosis; and treatment.

Results: Thirty-six full-text citations were included in this review. The prevalence of new or worsened MR after SAVR was 8.4%. Sixteen percent of new MR occurrences were from an organic etiology, and 83% of new MR occurrences were that of a functional etiology. Most diagnoses were made in the late or unspecified postoperative period using echocardiography (range: 0 minutes to 18 years postoperatively). While no patients died from this complication, 7.7% of patients (16 out of 207) required emergent procedural re-intervention.

Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying new or worsened MR following SAVR and accurate scoring of MR severity to guide treatment. It also outlines the associated clinical measures commonly documented following this complication, and the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography for the detection of significant MR. These results reflect the current, limited state of the literature on this topic and warrant further investigation into MR detection and management strategies in SAVR patients.

主动脉瓣置换术后新的或加重的二尖瓣返流:一项系统综述。
背景:新的或恶化的二尖瓣反流(MR)是主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)后罕见但严重的并发症。虽然有许多关于其发生的报道,但对其表现和管理几乎没有共识。本系统综述总结了当前文献中有关SAVR后新发或恶化MR的证据,并分析了其潜在影响。方法:数据库检查所有报道SAVR后新发或恶化MR的文章和摘要。收集的数据包括研究的患者数量;病人的特点;新发或恶化MR的发生率;诊断时机;和治疗。结果:本文共收录了36篇全文引文。SAVR后新发或恶化MR的发生率为8.4%。16%的MR新发病例是器质性病因,83%的MR新发病例是功能性病因。大多数诊断是在术后晚期或未明确的超声心动图(范围:术后0分钟至18年)。虽然没有患者死于该并发症,但7.7%的患者(207例中有16例)需要紧急手术再干预。结论:本系统综述强调了在SAVR后识别新的或恶化的MR以及MR严重程度的准确评分对指导治疗的重要性。它还概述了该并发症后通常记录的相关临床措施,以及经食管超声心动图对检测显著MR的有用性。这些结果反映了目前关于该主题的文献的有限状态,值得进一步研究SAVR患者的MR检测和管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信