Peri-Procedural Blood Pressure Changes and Their Relationship with MACE in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Integrated Blood Pressure Control Pub Date : 2020-12-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IBPC.S268848
Susan Labib, Hussein Heshmat Kassem, Hossam Kandil
{"title":"Peri-Procedural Blood Pressure Changes and Their Relationship with MACE in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Susan Labib,&nbsp;Hussein Heshmat Kassem,&nbsp;Hossam Kandil","doi":"10.2147/IBPC.S268848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peri-procedural blood-pressure (BP) changes were investigated and correlated to Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as predictor of outcome for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); whether acute coronary syndrome (Unstable angina, or MI; STEMI or NSTEMI) or scheduled for elective PCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Resting BP in the 204 recruited patients undergoing PCI throughout 2018 was measured thrice - in the ward before transferring to the cardiac catheterization lab (cath lab), in the cath lab, and after transfer to the recovery room. Patients were categorized based on their systolic and diastolic BP peri-procedural difference as systolic (SBP): with a large difference (>20 mmHg, n=47), with a small difference (≤20 mmHg, n=157) (shock patients excluded); diastolic (DBP): with a large difference (>10 mmHg, n=65), and with a small difference (≤10 mmHg, n=139). The primary end-points were MACE including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke during the hospital stay. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to analyze the data accordingly (p<0.005).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Within the category of MACE, cardiac mortality was the only adverse cardiac event encountered in the study sample. Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in both the large SBP-difference group versus the other group (10.6% vs 0.6%, p=0.003) and the large DBP-difference group versus the small-difference group (7.7% vs 0.7%, p=0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peri-procedural systolic and diastolic BP differences, greater than 20 mmHg and 10 mmHg, respectively, correlated with MACE in all patients undergoing PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":45299,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/IBPC.S268848","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Blood Pressure Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IBPC.S268848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Peri-procedural blood-pressure (BP) changes were investigated and correlated to Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as predictor of outcome for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); whether acute coronary syndrome (Unstable angina, or MI; STEMI or NSTEMI) or scheduled for elective PCI.

Methods: Resting BP in the 204 recruited patients undergoing PCI throughout 2018 was measured thrice - in the ward before transferring to the cardiac catheterization lab (cath lab), in the cath lab, and after transfer to the recovery room. Patients were categorized based on their systolic and diastolic BP peri-procedural difference as systolic (SBP): with a large difference (>20 mmHg, n=47), with a small difference (≤20 mmHg, n=157) (shock patients excluded); diastolic (DBP): with a large difference (>10 mmHg, n=65), and with a small difference (≤10 mmHg, n=139). The primary end-points were MACE including all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke during the hospital stay. The Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square tests were used to analyze the data accordingly (p<0.005).

Results: Within the category of MACE, cardiac mortality was the only adverse cardiac event encountered in the study sample. Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in both the large SBP-difference group versus the other group (10.6% vs 0.6%, p=0.003) and the large DBP-difference group versus the small-difference group (7.7% vs 0.7%, p=0.013).

Conclusion: Peri-procedural systolic and diastolic BP differences, greater than 20 mmHg and 10 mmHg, respectively, correlated with MACE in all patients undergoing PCI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者术中血压变化及其与MACE的关系:一项横断面研究。
背景:研究了术中血压(BP)变化与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的相关性,并将其作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者预后的预测因子;是否急性冠状动脉综合征(不稳定型心绞痛,或心肌梗死);STEMI或NSTEMI)或计划进行选择性PCI。方法:对2018年全年接受PCI治疗的204例患者的静息血压进行了三次测量,分别是在转入心导管实验室(cath lab)前、在cath实验室和转入康复室后。根据患者的收缩压和舒张压围手术期差异将患者分为收缩压(SBP):差异大(>20 mmHg, n=47),差异小(≤20 mmHg, n=157)(排除休克患者);舒张压(DBP):差异较大(> 10mmhg, n=65),差异较小(≤10mmhg, n=139)。主要终点为MACE,包括住院期间的全因死亡率、非致死性心肌梗死和卒中。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验对数据进行相应的分析(结果:在MACE类别中,心脏死亡是研究样本中遇到的唯一不良心脏事件。舒张压差异大组的心脏死亡率显著高于其他组(10.6% vs 0.6%, p=0.003),舒张压差异大组的心脏死亡率显著高于舒张压差异小组(7.7% vs 0.7%, p=0.013)。结论:所有PCI患者术中收缩压和舒张压差异分别大于20mmhg和10mmhg与MACE相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrated Blood Pressure Control
Integrated Blood Pressure Control PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信