Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy is Superior to Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in the Trimodality Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography Optimization.

Journal of radiation oncology Pub Date : 2019-12-01 Epub Date: 2019-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s13566-019-00411-0
Alexander D Sherry, Adam Stewart, Guozhen Luo, Austin N Kirschner
{"title":"Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy is Superior to Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in the Trimodality Management of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer with Daily Cone Beam Computed Tomography Optimization.","authors":"Alexander D Sherry,&nbsp;Adam Stewart,&nbsp;Guozhen Luo,&nbsp;Austin N Kirschner","doi":"10.1007/s13566-019-00411-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique may offer dosimetric and clinical benefits compared to the historical standard of care 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in definitive treatment of bladder cancer. We hypothesized that IMRT with CBCT would reduce dose to the rectum, bowel, and bladder compared to 3D-CRT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed nineteen patients treated with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by concurrent chemotherapy with IMRT. All patients received 45 Gy to the entire empty bladder followed by 19.8 Gy tumor boost treated with full bladder. 3D-CRT treatment plans were created for the same prescription. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test analyzed dosimetry and bladder volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rectum and bowel V40, V45, V50, V55, and V60 were reduced by over 50% in the IMRT plans compared to 3D-CRT (p<0.0001). IMRT also reduced volume of bladder irradiated compared to 3D-CRT (p<0.01). After CBCT, patients were likely to undergo clinically significant shifts ≥ 0.5 cm before boost delivery (p=0.001). Bladder volumes were significantly lower during boost treatments compared to pre-treatment simulation (p=0.002). There were 4 (21%) grade 3 genitourinary toxicities and 1 (5%) grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMRT is superior to 3D-CRT for bladder cancer and spares dose to bowel, rectum, and bladder with improved acute toxicity compared to published clinical literature. For boost treatment, daily full bladder volume and positioning are not always reproducible, supporting the need for CBCT for optimal localization of the primary bladder tumor.</p>","PeriodicalId":89815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiation oncology","volume":"8 4","pages":"395-403"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13566-019-00411-0","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiation oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-019-00411-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a volumetric-modulated arc therapy technique may offer dosimetric and clinical benefits compared to the historical standard of care 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in definitive treatment of bladder cancer. We hypothesized that IMRT with CBCT would reduce dose to the rectum, bowel, and bladder compared to 3D-CRT.

Methods: We reviewed nineteen patients treated with maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by concurrent chemotherapy with IMRT. All patients received 45 Gy to the entire empty bladder followed by 19.8 Gy tumor boost treated with full bladder. 3D-CRT treatment plans were created for the same prescription. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test analyzed dosimetry and bladder volumes.

Results: The rectum and bowel V40, V45, V50, V55, and V60 were reduced by over 50% in the IMRT plans compared to 3D-CRT (p<0.0001). IMRT also reduced volume of bladder irradiated compared to 3D-CRT (p<0.01). After CBCT, patients were likely to undergo clinically significant shifts ≥ 0.5 cm before boost delivery (p=0.001). Bladder volumes were significantly lower during boost treatments compared to pre-treatment simulation (p=0.002). There were 4 (21%) grade 3 genitourinary toxicities and 1 (5%) grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity.

Conclusion: IMRT is superior to 3D-CRT for bladder cancer and spares dose to bowel, rectum, and bladder with improved acute toxicity compared to published clinical literature. For boost treatment, daily full bladder volume and positioning are not always reproducible, supporting the need for CBCT for optimal localization of the primary bladder tumor.

调强放疗优于三维适形放疗在肌肉浸润性膀胱癌三峰治疗中的应用。
目的:与历史标准的三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)相比,使用体积调节电弧治疗技术的调强放疗(IMRT)在膀胱癌的最终治疗中可能提供剂量学和临床益处。我们假设与3D-CRT相比,CBCT联合IMRT会减少直肠、肠道和膀胱的剂量。方法:回顾性分析19例经尿道膀胱肿瘤最大切除术合并化疗联合IMRT治疗的病例。所有患者均接受45 Gy的全空膀胱放疗,随后接受19.8 Gy的全膀胱肿瘤放疗。为同一处方制定了3D-CRT治疗方案。配对t检验或Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验分析剂量学和膀胱容量。结果:与3D-CRT相比,IMRT方案中直肠和肠道V40、V45、V50、V55和V60降低了50%以上(p结论:IMRT治疗膀胱癌优于3D-CRT,并且与已发表的临床文献相比,IMRT对肠、直肠和膀胱的剂量少,急性毒性改善。对于增强治疗,每日全膀胱容量和定位并不总是可重复的,这支持了CBCT对原发性膀胱肿瘤最佳定位的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书