Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis.

Q2 Medicine
Elaine C Siegfried, Amy S Paller, Paola Mina-Osorio, Francis Vekeman, Mandeep Kaur, Usha G Mallya, Julie Héroux, Raymond Miao, Abhijit Gadkari
{"title":"Effects of variations in access to care for children with atopic dermatitis.","authors":"Elaine C Siegfried,&nbsp;Amy S Paller,&nbsp;Paola Mina-Osorio,&nbsp;Francis Vekeman,&nbsp;Mandeep Kaur,&nbsp;Usha G Mallya,&nbsp;Julie Héroux,&nbsp;Raymond Miao,&nbsp;Abhijit Gadkari","doi":"10.1186/s12895-020-00114-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An estimated 50% of children in the US are Medicaid-insured. Some of these patients have poor health literacy and limited access to medications and specialty care. These factors affect treatment utilization for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. This study assesses and compares treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between large cohorts of Medicaid and commercially insured children with AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients with AD were identified from 2 large US healthcare claims databases (2011-2016). Included patients had continuous health plan eligibility for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the first AD diagnosis (index date). Patients with an autoimmune disease diagnosis within 6 months of the index date were excluded. Treatment patterns and all-cause and AD-related HCRU during the observation period were compared between commercially and Medicaid-insured children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A minority of children were evaluated by a dermatology or allergy/immunology specialist. Several significant differences were observed between commercially and Medicaid-insured children with AD. Disparities detected for Medicaid-insured children included: comparatively fewer received specialist care, emergency department and urgent care center utilization was higher, a greater proportion had asthma and non-atopic morbidities, high- potency topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were less often prescribed, and prescriptions for antihistamines were more than three times higher, despite similar rates of comorbid asthma and allergies among antihistamine users. Treatment patterns also varied substantially across physician specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest barriers in accessing specialty care for all children with AD and significant differences in management between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. These disparities in treatment and access to specialty care may contribute to poor AD control, especially in Medicaid-insured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9014,"journal":{"name":"BMC Dermatology","volume":"20 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12895-020-00114-x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12895-020-00114-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: An estimated 50% of children in the US are Medicaid-insured. Some of these patients have poor health literacy and limited access to medications and specialty care. These factors affect treatment utilization for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), the most common inflammatory skin disease in children. This study assesses and compares treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) between large cohorts of Medicaid and commercially insured children with AD.

Methods: Pediatric patients with AD were identified from 2 large US healthcare claims databases (2011-2016). Included patients had continuous health plan eligibility for ≥6 months before and ≥12 months after the first AD diagnosis (index date). Patients with an autoimmune disease diagnosis within 6 months of the index date were excluded. Treatment patterns and all-cause and AD-related HCRU during the observation period were compared between commercially and Medicaid-insured children.

Results: A minority of children were evaluated by a dermatology or allergy/immunology specialist. Several significant differences were observed between commercially and Medicaid-insured children with AD. Disparities detected for Medicaid-insured children included: comparatively fewer received specialist care, emergency department and urgent care center utilization was higher, a greater proportion had asthma and non-atopic morbidities, high- potency topical corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors were less often prescribed, and prescriptions for antihistamines were more than three times higher, despite similar rates of comorbid asthma and allergies among antihistamine users. Treatment patterns also varied substantially across physician specialties.

Conclusions: Results suggest barriers in accessing specialty care for all children with AD and significant differences in management between commercially and Medicaid-insured children. These disparities in treatment and access to specialty care may contribute to poor AD control, especially in Medicaid-insured patients.

特应性皮炎患儿获得护理机会差异的影响。
背景:据估计,美国有50%的儿童参加了医疗补助。其中一些患者卫生知识贫乏,获得药物和专科护理的机会有限。这些因素影响儿童特应性皮炎(AD)患者的治疗利用,AD是儿童中最常见的炎症性皮肤病。本研究评估并比较了大量医疗补助和商业保险儿童AD患者的治疗模式和医疗资源利用率(HCRU)。方法:从美国2个大型医疗索赔数据库(2011-2016年)中确定患有AD的儿科患者。纳入的患者在首次AD诊断前≥6个月和首次AD诊断后≥12个月(指标日期)具有连续健康计划资格。在索引日期后6个月内诊断为自身免疫性疾病的患者被排除在外。比较商业和医疗保险儿童在观察期间的治疗方式和全因及ad相关HCRU。结果:少数儿童由皮肤科或过敏/免疫学专家进行评估。在商业和医疗保险儿童AD患者之间观察到一些显著的差异。在接受医疗补助的儿童中发现的差异包括:接受专科护理的儿童相对较少,急诊科和紧急护理中心的使用率较高,哮喘和非特应性疾病的比例较高,高效外用皮质类固醇和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的处方较少,抗组胺药的处方高出三倍以上,尽管在抗组胺药使用者中合并哮喘和过敏的比例相似。不同医师专业的治疗模式也有很大差异。结论:结果表明,所有AD患儿在获得专科护理方面存在障碍,并且商业和医疗补助儿童在管理方面存在显著差异。这些治疗和专科护理的差异可能导致AD控制不佳,特别是在医疗补助保险患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Dermatology
BMC Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Dermatology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of skin disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. BMC Dermatology (ISSN 1471-5945) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信